Russell wrote:Kurogane, just go to Europe coming summer for your holidays and enjoy.
Nothing to worry about.
I'm just fucking around man
| Hot Topics | |
|---|---|
Russell wrote:Kurogane, just go to Europe coming summer for your holidays and enjoy.
Nothing to worry about.
My wife and I made the mistake of getting hooked on the Netflix series, Making A Murderer, this weekend. Never watch sausage being made, and never take a look inside what the police do to make a case. It will ruin your trust in the system.
There were a couple of things that just infuriated me.
•There were two clear cases of scientific dishonesty that ought to have simply been thrown out, or never even been presented to the jury.
--->They tested a bullet for blood, and announced that it was from the victim. But the lab tech also disclosed that the negative control was contaminated! My jaw dropped at that. You don’t get to make that claim when your test was invalidated by error.
--->To disprove that the accused’s blood at the crime scene was not planted from a sample in police custody, they declared that the FBI, using a new test, had found no preservatives in the blood, therefore the sample couldn’t have been planted. Again, you can’t do that. What were the limits of detection? The best you can do is say that the test failed, and without a lot of evaluation of the samples and the procedure, you can’t state how likely their answer was.
Outrageous.
•One of the prosecutor’s tools was this horrifically detailed story of the murder, which they claim to have gotten from a confession by the accused’s nephew. But we have the recording of the “confession”, and it’s appalling. The nephew is this lost, confused, slow-witted teenager, and the police lead him through the story. He didn’t provide any of the purported details. They did.
The prosecutors didn’t exhibit a speck of shame at going on and on about knifings and stranglings and shooting and torture, with the only evidence being a fable fed to a not very bright kid. Is that a general character trait of prosecutors? I wouldn’t know.
Just to counterbalance the dismaying unprofessionalism, incompetence, and corruption of the police, though, I have to say I hope that if ever I’m accused of a crime, I want the defense attorneys, Dean Strang and Jerry Buting, on my side. They, at least, seemed to be well aware of the inconsistencies and falsehoods in the prosecution’s case. I don’t know whether the prosecutors weren’t very bright or were just doing their job to paper over the failings of their arguments.
I don’t know whether it’s the charitable assumption to guess that the prosecutors just didn’t care about the truth.
It’s also a shame because the victim was murdered, and my impression is that the Manitowoc police were more interested in pinning the blame on the accused than in actually figuring out what happened.
Mike Oxlong wrote:This PZ Myers blog post reminded me of the discussion of the Dutch case.
Fast losing all confidence in the justice systemMy wife and I made the mistake of getting hooked on the Netflix series, Making A Murderer, this weekend. Never watch sausage being made, and never take a look inside what the police do to make a case. It will ruin your trust in the system.
There were a couple of things that just infuriated me.
•There were two clear cases of scientific dishonesty that ought to have simply been thrown out, or never even been presented to the jury.
--->They tested a bullet for blood, and announced that it was from the victim. But the lab tech also disclosed that the negative control was contaminated! My jaw dropped at that. You don’t get to make that claim when your test was invalidated by error.
--->To disprove that the accused’s blood at the crime scene was not planted from a sample in police custody, they declared that the FBI, using a new test, had found no preservatives in the blood, therefore the sample couldn’t have been planted. Again, you can’t do that. What were the limits of detection? The best you can do is say that the test failed, and without a lot of evaluation of the samples and the procedure, you can’t state how likely their answer was.
Outrageous.
•One of the prosecutor’s tools was this horrifically detailed story of the murder, which they claim to have gotten from a confession by the accused’s nephew. But we have the recording of the “confession”, and it’s appalling. The nephew is this lost, confused, slow-witted teenager, and the police lead him through the story. He didn’t provide any of the purported details. They did.
The prosecutors didn’t exhibit a speck of shame at going on and on about knifings and stranglings and shooting and torture, with the only evidence being a fable fed to a not very bright kid. Is that a general character trait of prosecutors? I wouldn’t know.
Just to counterbalance the dismaying unprofessionalism, incompetence, and corruption of the police, though, I have to say I hope that if ever I’m accused of a crime, I want the defense attorneys, Dean Strang and Jerry Buting, on my side. They, at least, seemed to be well aware of the inconsistencies and falsehoods in the prosecution’s case. I don’t know whether the prosecutors weren’t very bright or were just doing their job to paper over the failings of their arguments.
I don’t know whether it’s the charitable assumption to guess that the prosecutors just didn’t care about the truth.
It’s also a shame because the victim was murdered, and my impression is that the Manitowoc police were more interested in pinning the blame on the accused than in actually figuring out what happened.
Cologne, Germany, was again the site of violent clashes Saturday, when authorities resorted to water cannons as a means of dispersing anti-Islam protesters, who reportedly fought back with firecrackers and bottles.
Coordinated by members of the xenophobic Pegida movement — Patriotic Europeans Against the Islamisation of the West — Saturday's demonstration of 1,700 people took place at Cologne's main train station; according to Deutsche Welle, "half of those attending the Pegida rally were football hooligans and right-wing extremists." Hundreds of police were dispatched to maintain order as some 1,300 counter-protesters converged on the anti-Muslim rally, where Chancellor Angela Merkel came under fire for her open-door policy on Middle Eastern refugees seeking asylum in Germany.
"Merkel has become a danger to our country," a Pegida protester reportedly told the demonstrators. "Merkel must go!"
The Dresden-based Pegida movement opposes the spread of Islam within Europe; it claims to stand against "hatemongers, regardless of which religion they belong to" and "radicalism, whether religiously or politically motivated." Yet, Merkel herself has condemned the group's racist ideology, saying they have "coldness, prejudice and hatred in their hearts." Pegida has loudly decried the influx of asylum seekers into Germany, and the attacks that swept Cologne's New Year's Eve celebrations have only added fuel to the fire.
kurogane wrote:Those guys sound scary to me, but at the very least that shitsow and all this ruckus over the NYE sexual assaults might help drive the discussion and discourse back from the edge of Charity/NGO driven hysterical sympathy and into the realm of the possible and the practical, like renting Turkey and Jordan and making some decent camps for them to stay in until they can go home, and leaving Europe to those who belong there: Europeans and First World tourists.
Wage Slave wrote:kurogane wrote:Those guys sound scary to me, but at the very least that shitsow and all this ruckus over the NYE sexual assaults might help drive the discussion and discourse back from the edge of Charity/NGO driven hysterical sympathy and into the realm of the possible and the practical, like renting Turkey and Jordan and making some decent camps for them to stay in until they can go home, and leaving Europe to those who belong there: Europeans and First World tourists.
Yep. I hated admitting it but Cameron got this one pretty much right at the time. Spend money on temporary camps, send money to maintain them but only offer residence to the most vulnerable. Small children who have lost their parents etc. And they travel normally and safely without the good offices of criminal gangs.
kurogane wrote:Which part did you hate, the part about putting up camps and them in them or having to grit your teeth and admit that Little Lord Porkapig got it right?
Samurai_Jerk wrote:EDIT: Just remembered the first episode is available on Youtube for free and it's not region blocked.
Users browsing this forum: Samurai_Jerk, Yahoo [Bot] and 3 guests