In real life: If the US pulled out of both countries they would be equally fucked for the four months that it would take Mitsubishi to build a nuke.
Day it take the JSDF to bring their nuke out of their secret storage in Hokkaido...
Hot Topics | |
---|---|
In real life: If the US pulled out of both countries they would be equally fucked for the four months that it would take Mitsubishi to build a nuke.
Takechanpoo wrote:U.S. experts urged Japan, Monday, to end its territorial claims on the islet of Dokdo and compensate victims of wartime sexual slavery who suffered under Japanese Imperial rule during World War II, to improve icy Korea-Japan relations................
Glosserman and Scott Snyder, senior fellows for Korea studies .....................
kurogane wrote:Yeah, I can see how that typical Japanese Male emotional niggardliness could really help the situation....... It reminds me of that dork that rides in the Women's Only train cars to highlight the shocking injustices Japanese Men face every day
http://www.fuckedgaijin.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=43&t=18139&start=750
Still, are we agreed that without the recent spate of revisionist quibbling and clawbacks that the apologies and compensation so far have officially or formally closed the topic? Not that anybody can remember that when all these pencil dycks keep trying to Liquid Paper over the original. I am furious with any Japanese that falls for that mental effluent........but I still can't bring myself to not boycott any and all sympathy for Worst Korea, and as for the Chinese ..........burp?
With all appropriate sympathy to all the victims themselves, of course.
kurogane wrote:I still can't bring myself to not boycott any and all sympathy for Worst Korea
Takechanpoo wrote:kurogane wrote:I still can't bring myself to not boycott any and all sympathy for Worst Korea
you believe the "painful" colonization story exaggerated by dozens of times by kimchee wankers as it is?
my book recommendations for proper understanding the truth of colonization of kimchi peninsula.
Offspring of Empire: The Koch'Ang Kims and the Colonial Origins of Korean Capitalism, 1876-1945 by Carter J. Eckert
http://www.amazon.co.jp/Offspring-Empir ... r+j+eckert
The Japanese Colonial Legacy in Korea, 1910-1945 by George Akita
http://www.amazon.com/Japanese-Colonial ... 302&sr=1-1
especially the first one is most recommended
wuchan wrote:Takechanpoo wrote:kurogane wrote:I still can't bring myself to not boycott any and all sympathy for Worst Korea
you believe the "painful" colonization story exaggerated by dozens of times by kimchee wankers as it is
you proved over and over again that you read at a US elementary school level. Tuck tail and keep the 5% of respect you have.
the former commander of the Japanese submarine fleet, Masao Kobayashi, cast doubt on Australia's ability to build them.
"They don't have enough skilled workers to fashion the high-tension steel; it's even hard to do in Japan," he told the Australian Broadcasting Corporation (ABC).
Another Japanese submarine captain, Toshihide Yamauchi, raised concern to the ABC about Australia's ability to safeguard sensitive Japanese intellectual property.
"We're worried about leaks to China once our technology is in Australia," he said.
Independent South Australian Senator Nick Xenophon hit back over the comments, calling them a "disgrace".
Takechanpoo wrote:the former commander of the Japanese submarine fleet, Masao Kobayashi, cast doubt on Australia's ability to build them.
"They don't have enough skilled workers to fashion the high-tension steel; it's even hard to do in Japan," he told the Australian Broadcasting Corporation (ABC).
Another Japanese submarine captain, Toshihide Yamauchi, raised concern to the ABC about Australia's ability to safeguard sensitive Japanese intellectual property.
"We're worried about leaks to China once our technology is in Australia," he said.
Independent South Australian Senator Nick Xenophon hit back over the comments, calling them a "disgrace".
http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/06/ ... 8120150604
http://www.radioaustralia.net.au/intern ... sa/1454724
they just said a truth, though.
and who did disgrace first is aussie side. at first they begged japan to buy our sophisticated submarine. but afterward they shamelessly converted the deal to competitive bidding between germany and france who cant product aussie required submarine. what impolite peasants in southern barbaric island they are.
Takechanpoo wrote:they just said a truth, though.
and who did disgrace first is aussie side. at first they begged japan to buy our sophisticated submarine. but afterward they shamelessly converted the deal to competitive bidding between germany and france who cant product aussie required submarine. what impolite peasants in southern barbaric island they are.
Russell wrote:Takechanpoo wrote:the former commander of the Japanese submarine fleet, Masao Kobayashi, cast doubt on Australia's ability to build them.
"They don't have enough skilled workers to fashion the high-tension steel; it's even hard to do in Japan," he told the Australian Broadcasting Corporation (ABC).
Another Japanese submarine captain, Toshihide Yamauchi, raised concern to the ABC about Australia's ability to safeguard sensitive Japanese intellectual property.
"We're worried about leaks to China once our technology is in Australia," he said.
Independent South Australian Senator Nick Xenophon hit back over the comments, calling them a "disgrace".
http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/06/ ... 8120150604
http://www.radioaustralia.net.au/intern ... sa/1454724
they just said a truth, though.
and who did disgrace first is aussie side. at first they begged japan to buy our sophisticated submarine. but afterward they shamelessly converted the deal to competitive bidding between germany and france who cant product aussie required submarine. what impolite peasants in southern barbaric island they are.
Hmm, you sound like a Frenchman who boasts about his country's technological achievements without having contributed to them...
Yokohammer wrote:Sorry Takechan. This is just typically piss-poor diplomacy on Japan's part. A transparent attempt to move production to Japan. Amateurs. They'll probably lose business because of it.
~ Tapatalking ~
Takechanpoo wrote:Yokohammer wrote:Sorry Takechan. This is just typically piss-poor diplomacy on Japan's part. A transparent attempt to move production to Japan. Amateurs. They'll probably lose business because of it.
~ Tapatalking ~
seems like you misunderstand something.
at first j-side was not willing to sell soryu. because the technologies used in soryu is one of top secrets of jsdf.
but uncle sam went between this deal and j-side reluctantly sat down at the negociating table.
and then their rude attitude. its peculier to uncivlized stinky peasants.
j-side is amazed at it. and they conveyed the feeling via ex-jsdf guys mouths this time
Coligny wrote:Russell wrote:Takechanpoo wrote:the former commander of the Japanese submarine fleet, Masao Kobayashi, cast doubt on Australia's ability to build them.
"They don't have enough skilled workers to fashion the high-tension steel; it's even hard to do in Japan," he told the Australian Broadcasting Corporation (ABC).
Another Japanese submarine captain, Toshihide Yamauchi, raised concern to the ABC about Australia's ability to safeguard sensitive Japanese intellectual property.
"We're worried about leaks to China once our technology is in Australia," he said.
Independent South Australian Senator Nick Xenophon hit back over the comments, calling them a "disgrace".
http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/06/ ... 8120150604
http://www.radioaustralia.net.au/intern ... sa/1454724
they just said a truth, though.
and who did disgrace first is aussie side. at first they begged japan to buy our sophisticated submarine. but afterward they shamelessly converted the deal to competitive bidding between germany and france who cant product aussie required submarine. what impolite peasants in southern barbaric island they are.
Hmm, you sound like a Frenchman who boasts about his country's technological achievements without having contributed to them...
Our sub drivers can barely handle their boats so at least they won't pretend to know how they are made... Meanwhile, pretty sure that part of mah tax muney paid for their construction.
At least I can claim, legitimately or not, achievements a bit more glorious than tulip scams or the rape of Nankin and powerplant going tits up...
It's funny that it's the most mediocre nations that try to deny the merit of the overachievers...
Takechanpoo wrote:they just said a truth, though.
and who did disgrace first is aussie side. at first they begged japan to buy our sophisticated submarine. but afterward they shamelessly converted the deal to competitive bidding between germany and france who cant product aussie required submarine. what impolite peasants in southern barbaric island they are.
chokonen888 wrote:The latest Chinese hacking debacle I heard about was in Japan...not Australia.
Samurai_Jerk wrote:chokonen888 wrote:The latest Chinese hacking debacle I heard about was in Japan...not Australia.
Yeah, what kind third-world shit hole masquerading as a developed nation gets hacked by China?
Takechanpoo wrote:have a good time to indulge in idle fancies?
its meaningless to reason by different field of analogy.
soryu is highest performance diesel powered submarine on earth. no other country can copy the silence.
india too started getting interested in it.
its only japan and russia which can product aussie required diesel powered submarine.
and aussie choice is only japans soryu from first to last. nevertheless they converted the deal to competitive bidding just to lower the price.
japan will not sell soryu to that impolite stinky barbarians crawling with 4 legs. at least i hope so.
Russell wrote:In fact, the main achievement of those subs is their silent and superior operation, which is due to their air-independent propulsion based on Kockums stirling engines license-built by Kawasaki Heavy Industries. Kockums, that doesn't sound very Japanese, right? In fact, they are Swedish...
Russell wrote:Coligny wrote:Russell wrote:Takechanpoo wrote:the former commander of the Japanese submarine fleet, Masao Kobayashi, cast doubt on Australia's ability to build them.
"They don't have enough skilled workers to fashion the high-tension steel; it's even hard to do in Japan," he told the Australian Broadcasting Corporation (ABC).
Another Japanese submarine captain, Toshihide Yamauchi, raised concern to the ABC about Australia's ability to safeguard sensitive Japanese intellectual property.
"We're worried about leaks to China once our technology is in Australia," he said.
Independent South Australian Senator Nick Xenophon hit back over the comments, calling them a "disgrace".
http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/06/ ... 8120150604
http://www.radioaustralia.net.au/intern ... sa/1454724
they just said a truth, though.
and who did disgrace first is aussie side. at first they begged japan to buy our sophisticated submarine. but afterward they shamelessly converted the deal to competitive bidding between germany and france who cant product aussie required submarine. what impolite peasants in southern barbaric island they are.
Hmm, you sound like a Frenchman who boasts about his country's technological achievements without having contributed to them...
Our sub drivers can barely handle their boats so at least they won't pretend to know how they are made... Meanwhile, pretty sure that part of mah tax muney paid for their construction.
At least I can claim, legitimately or not, achievements a bit more glorious than tulip scams or the rape of Nankin and powerplant going tits up...
It's funny that it's the most mediocre nations that try to deny the merit of the overachievers...
Again you make the mistake to mix your country's achievements with your own achievements...
Coligny wrote:Russell wrote:Coligny wrote:Russell wrote:Takechanpoo wrote:the former commander of the Japanese submarine fleet, Masao Kobayashi, cast doubt on Australia's ability to build them.
"They don't have enough skilled workers to fashion the high-tension steel; it's even hard to do in Japan," he told the Australian Broadcasting Corporation (ABC).
Another Japanese submarine captain, Toshihide Yamauchi, raised concern to the ABC about Australia's ability to safeguard sensitive Japanese intellectual property.
"We're worried about leaks to China once our technology is in Australia," he said.
Independent South Australian Senator Nick Xenophon hit back over the comments, calling them a "disgrace".
http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/06/ ... 8120150604
http://www.radioaustralia.net.au/intern ... sa/1454724
they just said a truth, though.
and who did disgrace first is aussie side. at first they begged japan to buy our sophisticated submarine. but afterward they shamelessly converted the deal to competitive bidding between germany and france who cant product aussie required submarine. what impolite peasants in southern barbaric island they are.
Hmm, you sound like a Frenchman who boasts about his country's technological achievements without having contributed to them...
Our sub drivers can barely handle their boats so at least they won't pretend to know how they are made... Meanwhile, pretty sure that part of mah tax muney paid for their construction.
At least I can claim, legitimately or not, achievements a bit more glorious than tulip scams or the rape of Nankin and powerplant going tits up...
It's funny that it's the most mediocre nations that try to deny the merit of the overachievers...
Again you make the mistake to mix your country's achievements with your own achievements...
Soooo, you are saying that no part of mah tax muney went into paying for some naval gear ?
Russell wrote:Takechan, those Japanese generals probably want to prevent this submarine from being sold to foreigners, because they do not wish to give away a strategic advantage, so they choose to offend them Ozzies. If the Ozzies are wise, they just ignore those morons.
Now, I do not deny that these submarines are probably world-class products (though they apparently have never been tested in battle), but there is not a single ounce of achievement on your part in them, isn't it?
In fact, the main achievement of those subs is their silent and superior operation, which is due to their air-independent propulsion based on Kockums stirling engines license-built by Kawasaki Heavy Industries. Kockums, that doesn't sound very Japanese, right? In fact, they are Swedish...
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 93 guests