Samurai_Jerk wrote:If someone comes up with a drone that fires bullets for the consumer market and calls it a remote gun, that might get regulators to back off.
Guns don't kill people, drones do!
Hot Topics | |
---|---|
Samurai_Jerk wrote:If someone comes up with a drone that fires bullets for the consumer market and calls it a remote gun, that might get regulators to back off.
Samurai_Jerk wrote:If someone comes up with a drone that fires bullets for the consumer market and calls it a remote gun, that might get regulators to back off.
matsuki wrote:That could have been ugly....what caused it?
Samurai_Jerk wrote:matsuki wrote:That could have been ugly....what caused it?
If only there were someway you could search for that information.
Samurai_Jerk wrote:matsuki wrote:That could have been ugly....what caused it?
If only there were someway you could search for that information.
Samurai_Jerk wrote:matsuki wrote:That could have been ugly....what caused it?
If only there were someway you could search for that information.
Coligny wrote:Samurai_Jerk wrote:matsuki wrote:That could have been ugly....what caused it?
If only there were someway you could search for that information.
We already got a LMGTFY doosh... Find another jerb...
And coming for the jerkwad who had a tantrum because I didn't post the full bio of Dannie Riel with a sparkly bewbs video... No less...
Russell wrote:Since drones have been in the news again, it is time for some countermeasures...
Cool stuff, but commentary is stupid. Since when is the Netherlands the land of the Vikings?
Drone believed to have hit British Airways flight 'may have been a plastic bag'
wuchan wrote:Does this mean voting season is about to get even more annoying?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 51 guests