Hot Topics | |
---|---|
A Japanese coastguard spokesman said that he was not aware of any injuries and that only one water cannon was fired, after a rock was thrown from one of the protest ships.
Thousands protest China's ruling on H.K. democracy reform
HONG KONG, Japan - Some 20,000 people marched through the streets of Hong Kong on April 11 to protest against Beijing's tightening control on democrat ...
AssKissinger wrote:Holy Shit! They must be out of their freaking minds. What the fuck would they do if China decided to hit back? I don't care if it was water canons. A Chinese man was injured by an attack by the Japanese military. Jesus. That's bad.
A boat carrying four volunteers for a Chinese activist group who tried to stage a protest on a small group of disputed islands in the East China sea was on its way home Monday after being blocked by Japanese patrol boats.
The four from the activist group Chinese Foundation of Diaoyu Defense, who say the islands are part of China, set off from Xiamen, in southeast Fujian province, and came within 13 kilometers (8 miles) of the islands Sunday evening, according to their spokesman Li Yan.
They were hindered by three Japanese naval ships using water cannon and one plane, he said, as they held up a Chinese flag.
. . . "If Diaoyu islands are not given back to China our activity will not stop," Li told The Associated Press.
. . . Tokyo told Beijing that the islands "are no doubt our territory historically and according to international law," according to the ministry. Tokyo also said, "It is extremely regrettable something like this happened and we strongly protest," according to the statement . . . more
Samurai_Jerk wrote:Are you kidding? The Chinese military is garbage. Unless the Chinese decide to nuke Japan they can't do much.
Chinese-made dumplings which made 10 people sick in Japan had been sabotaged, most probably in Japan, China's security and quality watchdogs said on Thursday.
Buraku wrote:What fucking drugs do you smoke ? Never hear about the Korean war, a bunch of impoverished Chinese joined in armed with only Soviet rifles and WW2 era artillery they went toe-to-toe with the U.S and its NATO allies and drove the Western powers from their position near Pyongyang back down near the initial position near a few miles of Seoul.
Buraku wrote:I agree that China Navy is pretty useless (but it improves every year), Air force is a degree better and getting very good at producing/copying stuff but the China Army is undeniably one of the mightiest if not the strongest on the planet, underestimate it to your own embarrassment.
Boomer wrote:Actually, it was only after the United States left South Korea that the North invaded.
" US administration responded by declaring martial law"....
"United States still had substantial forces in Japan to oppose the North Korean military "...
"government that emerged was led by anti-communist U.S.-educated strongman Syngman Rhee,...
" the American Task Force Smith, part of the U.S. Army's 24th Infantry Division based in Japan.On July 5, it fought for the first time at Osan and was immediately defeated with 1,416 casualties and 785 taken prisoner.The victorious North Korean forces advanced southwards, and the 24th Division was forced to retreat to Taejeon" ....
".....CIA officer named Douglas MacKiernan stationed in China gathered intelligence that predicted the war."
Boomer wrote:They actually took the entire peninsula except for a little bit of territory around Pusan.
Boomer wrote: It was only by treaty that the north got that back.
Boomer wrote: Unfortunately for them, modern warfare is much different than the fifties.
Boomer wrote: In a strictly military engagement, China would be in bad shape against the U.S. or Russia, its two biggest threats at this time.
Boomer wrote:They can't even invade Taiwan. The only way that they would be able to take either would be to practice a scorched earth policy, which would probably utilize nukes. Kind of defeats the purpose, no?
Boomer wrote:Of course, China has almost bought the U.S. outright, so they will be invading courtesy of China Air.
Samurai_Jerk wrote:"Japan has perhaps lit a fire which could ultimately seriously damage relations and even force a showdown," it wrote. ...
Behan wrote:I wouldn't be surprised to see some retaliation in the near future. Japanese fishing ships in the area better be careful.
Samurai_Jerk wrote:China has said the confrontation could damage its relations with Japan, underlining the sensitivity of the territorial dispute in the area. .......
Greji wrote:China is quite good at calling the confrontation card on anything it doesn't like, or just feels it can bully "the offender" over to its way of thinking. It's interesting to see Japan, at least in this case, sticking by its guns, ahh I meaning sticking by its chopsticks.
;)"Yeah, I've been always awkward toward women and have spent pathetic life so far but I could graduate from being a cherry boy by using geisha's pussy at last! Yeah!! And off course I have an account in Fuckedgaijin.com. Yeah!!!"
That's why they called it "Mischief Reef".Tsuru wrote:It's called "Mischief reef" in the Spratlys just off the coast of the Philippines, it's barely above water and yet it has Chinese shit built on it.
Samurai_Jerk wrote:Japanese prosecutors decided Friday to release the captain of a Chinese fishing boat involved in a collision near disputed islands whose detention raised tensions between the Asian neighbors.
Yokohammer wrote:I'm not sure what to think about this.
My first reaction was "pussies!" But maybe playing the adult card is the best thing to do in this case. I do think the pressure applied by China has been totally uncalled for and has only succeeded in making them look belligerent, especially since their territorial claims seem to be driven more by potential profit than by historical fact. I was pretty sure that Japan would stand firm, and am frankly surprised that they've backed down. I assume this was discussed with the US while Kan was there, and that this decision is at least partly based on that discussion. Confused nonetheless.
Yokohammer wrote:I'm not sure what to think about this.
My first reaction was "pussies!" But maybe playing the adult card is the best thing to do in this case. I do think the pressure applied by China has been totally uncalled for and has only succeeded in making them look belligerent, especially since their territorial claims seem to be driven more by potential profit than by historical fact. I was pretty sure that Japan would stand firm, and am frankly surprised that they've backed down. I assume this was discussed with the US while Kan was there, and that this decision is at least partly based on that discussion. Confused nonetheless.
Yokohammer wrote:I'm not sure what to think about this.
My first reaction was "pussies!" But maybe playing the adult card is the best thing to do in this case. I do think the pressure applied by China has been totally uncalled for and has only succeeded in making them look belligerent, especially since their territorial claims seem to be driven more by potential profit than by historical fact. I was pretty sure that Japan would stand firm, and am frankly surprised that they've backed down. I assume this was discussed with the US while Kan was there, and that this decision is at least partly based on that discussion. Confused nonetheless.
Kan, Obama agree to consult on China
NEW YORK (Kyodo) Prime Minister Naoto Kan and U.S. President Barack Obama agreed Thursday their countries will consult closely on the heightened tensions between Japan and China, Deputy Chief Cabinet Secretary Tetsuro Fukuyama said.
Kan and Obama, meeting in New York on the sidelines of U.N. meetings, also confirmed the importance of the Japan-U.S. security alliance, saying it not only stabilizes the Asia-Pacific region but also serves as a cornerstone for global peace and prosperity.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests