Hot Topics | |
---|---|
Gov't urged to encourage elderly to move out of Tokyo region
Coligny wrote:Don't they have an established constitutionnal group checking the laws before they are allowed to go into effect ?
I think even the merkinz have that... And god knows that their constitution is just a piece of paper(tm)...
The decision was made because the opposition camp has been fiercely disputing the legislation after all three constitutional scholars called to speak before a meeting of the lower house Commission on the Constitution, including a scholar recommended by the ruling Liberal Democratic Party (LDP), said the bills violate the pacifist Constitution.
Salty wrote:Coligny wrote:Don't they have an established constitutionnal group checking the laws before they are allowed to go into effect ?
I think even the merkinz have that... And god knows that their constitution is just a piece of paper(tm)...
I think that group gets appointed by the Prime Minister...
LDP Diet affairs chief Tsutomu Sato warned Funada upon receiving a report on the session, saying, "You should pay attention to the selection of people (to be invited to the panel), the subjects for discussion and the schedules, out of consideration for their impact on the lower house committee on peace and security legislation."
According to informed sources, the LDP had initially requested Kyoto University professor emeritus Koji Sato to attend the panel as he has connections with the ruling party through judicial system reform. However, due to a scheduling conflict, the party decided to pick Waseda University professor Hasebe to speak instead.
Coligny wrote:From the same wabsite:Gov't urged to encourage elderly to move out of Tokyo region
Stay classy japan...
http://mainichi.jp/english/english/news ... 9000c.html
Salty wrote:Lol - may I presume that the post title - Router recommendation, is a reference to routing the elderly out of Tokyo? But yea, it is rather a nasty state of affairs when the city in which people lived, worked, and paid their taxes in - wants to dispose of them. Echo of Aso`s suggestion that old people should die off, instead of burdening the health care system.
Salty wrote:Cornered…
Gov't to give up on plan to put security bills to lower house vote by end of current sessionThe decision was made because the opposition camp has been fiercely disputing the legislation after all three constitutional scholars called to speak before a meeting of the lower house Commission on the Constitution, including a scholar recommended by the ruling Liberal Democratic Party (LDP), said the bills violate the pacifist Constitution.
Salty wrote:Salty wrote:Cornered…
Gov't to give up on plan to put security bills to lower house vote by end of current sessionThe decision was made because the opposition camp has been fiercely disputing the legislation after all three constitutional scholars called to speak before a meeting of the lower house Commission on the Constitution, including a scholar recommended by the ruling Liberal Democratic Party (LDP), said the bills violate the pacifist Constitution.
Hate to quote myself - and I see that I didn`t provide the link for that quote - but I heard on the TV news that the LDP will instead extend the diet session so that they can ram thru their unconstitutional law.... Haven`t seen this in print yet....
"the case is of a highly political nature; therefore, constitutional judgment on the case by the judicial court is not appropriate"
kurogane wrote:To back up what Wuchan just said, I am pretty sure I remember reading somewhere that Japan is either formally or practically a constitutionally moderated parliamentary supremacy, like Canada and the UK rather than say, the US or Germany. In which case, the Diet can gorge to its heart content and then do end runs around an already rather timid or marginal supreme court.
Takechanpoo wrote:kimchese schizophrenia exploded as usual.
kimchee peninsula does NOT exist in the visual field of j-defence policy this time.
just learn how to correctly connect cause with effect before worrying about it
kurogane wrote:PS I am amazed anybody has the patience to care what banana boy means anymore. This ultra pantomime Yellow Face Chop Chop speak is getting almost racist.
Coligny wrote:kurogane wrote:PS I am amazed anybody has the patience to care what banana boy means anymore. This ultra pantomime Yellow Face Chop Chop speak is getting almost racist.
Welcome
To
The
Club
Samurai_Jerk wrote:Coligny wrote:kurogane wrote:PS I am amazed anybody has the patience to care what banana boy means anymore. This ultra pantomime Yellow Face Chop Chop speak is getting almost racist.
Welcome
To
The
Club
Oh, the irony.
Coligny wrote:Samurai_Jerk wrote:Coligny wrote:kurogane wrote:PS I am amazed anybody has the patience to care what banana boy means anymore. This ultra pantomime Yellow Face Chop Chop speak is getting almost racist.
Welcome
To
The
Club
Oh, the irony.
come on... I'm missunderst00d because, like blue cheeze, I'm an acquired taste...
Salty wrote:Given the recent Abe administration push to pass laws that will allow the LDP & Komeito politicians to take Japan to war once again… Today I overheard a husband/wife conversation that went something like this:
Wife: Those bills are unconstitutional.
Husband: We don`t need a constitution.
So I wonder if this is a commonly held belief - that Japan doesn`t need a constitution at all.
Salty wrote: So I wonder if this is a commonly held belief - that Japan doesn`t need a constitution at all.
kurogane wrote:Salty wrote: So I wonder if this is a commonly held belief - that Japan doesn`t need a constitution at all.
As far as I can remember it tends to be a mildly grumpy middle aged or older man thing that goes something like this: it is an imposed foreign institution that rode roughshod over numerous traditional Japanese methods of govenrment and jurisprudence and is to be resented as such.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 15 guests