Hot Topics | |
---|---|
FG Lurker wrote:Every time I get a wire in my business MUFG account the fuckers call to confirm before making the deposit. Drives me fucking nuts!
wagyl wrote:Not only that they charge 4000 yen, even if you have gone to the trouble to get the money denominated in JPY before transfer.
FG Lurker wrote:Nah, they don't charge me. You can get those sorts of fees waved if you negotiate when you're setting up a business account. Exchange rate spreads are negotiable too, depending on volume.
chokonen888 wrote: A few years ago I wired to one of my friends here with a Mizuho account...took 2 weeks and even then, they called and demanded my friend give them a detailed explanation about what the transfer was for.
chokonen888 wrote:Wow, that's more flexible than I thought...I charge most of my customers by credit card through a U.S. merchant account which goes to my U.S. business account. (From what I hear, J merchant accounts hold the funds for 60~90 days and take some sort of outrageous percentage out...I get the funds in 3 days and it avoids the additional time/cost of individual bank wires)
chokonen888 wrote:I've always held to the rule that the less I deal with J-banking, the better. No taxes either
Jack wrote:they would not accept a pdf copy of a signed letter sent by email. They would not accept a faxed letter. It had to be their own form signed and mailed in an envelope. Finally I drewdown the balance and left 400 yen in it and they are still calling me and the account is still not closed.
FG Lurker wrote:I do much the same thing. Sales & billing are done through my US subsidiary which makes payment processing a lot less expensive and a lot less frustrating.
FG Lurker wrote:The Japanese tax office gets automatic notification of any wire (incoming and maybe outgoing too) that exceeds JPY 1 million. Banks must also notify them if it seems you are structuring your wires to receive (or send I guess) multiple wires under that limit. This law changed in 2009, the limit used to be 2mil yen and there were no rules about using multiple wires to stay under the limit. As someone who has received a letter from the tax office asking why I received so many bank wires I can say with certainty that the tax office does watch.
chokonen888 wrote:BTW, what did you end up telling the Tax office and what was their reaction?
chokonen888 wrote:I don't see how they can do much to me when the funds go to a personal account but TIJ, and who knows what policies exist.
chokonen888 wrote:I've avoided all the large incoming wires by taking payment via the US merchant account so I doubt I have anything to worry about just yet BUT I'm really glad you posted as I can definitely find a way to work around the wires and just deposit cash into my account here.
FG Lurker wrote:My advice to you would be to pay the tax. If one of your Japan-based customers gets audited it could lead back to you. If you make too many large cash deposits to domestic bank accounts it could raise a flag (anti-yak laws). With all the deductions you can take here the tax load really isn't that bad, plus you get potential bonuses like business development loans once everything is squared away.
chokonen888 wrote:I'm not avoiding paying taxes, just setup to pay taxes to the U.S. instead of Japan. Tracing any orders back would lead to my US business, which is exporting product to the customers in Japan. The only tax not getting paid is the Japanese consumption tax, which needn't be paid to a U.S. based business. The money I would be depositing in my personal account here is just that, personal funds, not being used for business.
FG Lurker wrote:Am@zon Japan is fighting the tax office over a similar set up at the moment. It's a huge court case that has been going on for a few years... (Am@zon does not pay income taxes in Japan, claiming that the business is online and the sales are taking place offshore.) I'm sure your business is set up somewhat differently to Am@zon but the point is that the tax office here doesn't give up once they decide to go after someone. "Transfer pricing", which determines the amount of profit that stays in one country vs another, is a huge issue for any company conducting business in more than one country. It's a big point of contention for many countries, including Japan.
* Sorry about the @ marks, for some reason FG stars out ******.
chokonen888 wrote:Very interesting indeed.
If that's their stance, I wonder why they registered a KK in Japan. Would seem like they could have avoided that and having an office over here if they outsourced their advertising/PR to a Japanese marketing company and customer support to yet another company.
FG Lurker wrote:I don't know all the ins and outs of the case in detail. I have a friend who works for a large accounting firm doing transfer pricing work and he mentioned the basics the other day.
I would assume Am@zon has a KK here for their fulfillment/logistics business and for working with domestic suppliers. Sales themselves however go through an offshore business (Am@zon International or something I think). Am@zon also has very few "company employees" here, almost everyone is a contractor or temp staff.
chokonen888 wrote:I'm not avoiding paying taxes, just setup to pay taxes to the U.S. instead of Japan. Tracing any orders back would lead to my US business, which is exporting product to the customers in Japan. The only tax not getting paid is the Japanese consumption tax, which needn't be paid to a U.S. based business. The money I would be depositing in my personal account here is just that, personal funds, not being used for business.
FG Lurker wrote:Basically Japan (and other countries) want tax from profits generated by work in their countries. If Japan audits you then they will want you to pay tax on all profits generated by work done in Japan, no matter where your company may be registered. This has become much stricter in the past few years, it's an area the tax office is really focusing on.
Screwed-down Hairdo wrote:Great post! I suspect Japan may continue to become even stricter on overseas transfers in the coming years. It needs to pay for its aging society (pension, health, funeral costs for jiichan/baachan who don't look where they're going when theyre on their chari, etc.) and public debt and the only way it can really effectively do so is to go after funds generated by the mass of industry it allowed to move overseas in the past couple of decades.
A by-product of this is going to be more stringent policing of transfers of funds into Japan, and probably, increased taxes levied on them.
But take this with a grain of salt....I know fuck-all about money.
FG Lurker wrote:Your current situation falls under transfer pricing it would seem.
chokonen888 wrote:I'm not sure the specifics of the law here but it would be pretty surprising to learn if they can hold some personally accountable for taxes they feel they are owed by a business. (a foreign one at that)
chokonen888 wrote:Yeah, if they go after anyone, it's not gonna be pretty. Business doesn't require me to be in Japan at all but being blacklist from Japan would indeed suck. Makes me even more interested in what happens with ******. This type of cracking down can also start a taxing war with other countries who have Japanese agents within their borders, selling direct and importing from Japan.
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 4 guests