Home | Forums | Mark forums read | Search | FAQ | Login

Advanced search
Hot Topics
Buraku hot topic Warm and Toasty
Buraku hot topic Japanese jazz pianist beaten up on NYC subway
Buraku hot topic Russian Shenanigans
Buraku hot topic Debito reinvents himself as a Uyoku movie star!
Buraku hot topic This is the bomb!
Buraku hot topic Iran, DPRK, Nuke em, Like Japan
Buraku hot topic Looking for the Japanese Elon Musk
Buraku hot topic Massive earthquake hits Indonesia, Tsunami kills thousands.
Buraku hot topic 'Paris Syndrome' strikes Japanese
Buraku hot topic Japan finally heading back to 3rd World Status? LOL
Change font size
  • fuckedgaijin ‹ General ‹ F*cked News

Czech Man Suspected Of Child Abduction

Odd news from Japan and all things Japanese around the world.
Post a reply
19 posts • Page 1 of 1

Czech Man Suspected Of Child Abduction

Postby Mulboyne » Sat Nov 07, 2009 6:58 pm

Kyodo: Czech man takes son out of Japan in suspected child abduction
A Czech man has taken his 5-year-old son apparently to a place overseas from his home in Gifu Prefecture, prompting the boy's Japanese mother to seek help from the Foreign Ministry in searching for the boy's whereabouts, sources close to the matter said Saturday.
User avatar
Mulboyne
 
Posts: 18608
Joined: Thu May 06, 2004 1:39 pm
Location: London
Top

Postby (1VB)freels » Sat Nov 07, 2009 7:12 pm

Ohhhh how the tables have turned.......
User avatar
(1VB)freels
 
Posts: 316
Images: 1
Joined: Sat Jul 01, 2006 12:18 pm
Location: NAS Patuxent River, Maryland
  • YIM
  • Personal album
Top

Postby Mike Oxlong » Sat Nov 07, 2009 7:29 pm

Another fucked back-story, no doubt...:confused:
•I prefer liberty with danger to peace with slavery.•
User avatar
Mike Oxlong
 
Posts: 6818
Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2004 5:47 pm
Location: 古き良き日本
Top

Postby omae mona » Sat Nov 07, 2009 9:51 pm

(1VB)freels wrote:Ohhhh how the tables have turned.......

I doubt the tables have turned at all. If he returns to his country, which is a signatory to the Hague convention, his government is obliged to return the child to Japan. Unless he is in hiding, he will not get to keep the kid.
User avatar
omae mona
 
Posts: 3184
Joined: Mon Aug 18, 2003 12:08 pm
Top

Postby Screwed-down Hairdo » Sat Nov 07, 2009 10:20 pm

omae mona wrote:I doubt the tables have turned at all. If he returns to his country, which is a signatory to the Hague convention, his government is obliged to return the child to Japan. Unless he is in hiding, he will not get to keep the kid.


I'm not sure whether that would actually be the case. I used to work with a woman whose kid was taken from her by her first Japanese husband and she could do nothing about it. When her second marriage crumbled in Japan, she snatched her kid and scrambled back to her native country (a Hague signatory) and, as far as I know, stayed there with impunity.
I'm by no means an expert, though.
It's sad to again another case like this.
I still argue the more fundamental problem is the lack of shared custody under Japanese law. Until that is solved, there will not be a solution regarding the Hague convention.
User avatar
Screwed-down Hairdo
Maezumo
 
Posts: 6721
Joined: Wed May 20, 2009 7:03 pm
Top

Postby omae mona » Sat Nov 07, 2009 10:49 pm

Screwed-down Hairdo wrote:I'm not sure whether that would actually be the case. I used to work with a woman whose kid was taken from her by her first Japanese husband and she could do nothing about it. When her second marriage crumbled in Japan, she snatched her kid and scrambled back to her native country (a Hague signatory) and, as far as I know, stayed there with impunity.
I'm by no means an expert, though.

I am sure no expert either. I wonder if your acquaintance's second husband (or the Japanese government) actually took the steps of filing an official grievance under Hague. If they did and the foreign country still didn't respond, that seems kind of strange. But maybe the Hague convention doesn't really have any effect. I have no idea.

I still argue the more fundamental problem is the lack of shared custody under Japanese law. Until that is solved, there will not be a solution regarding the Hague convention.


:clap: Agreed. I think it is important to remember that the vast majority of custody disputes do not involve international kidnapping, so Hague has nothing to do with them. And yes, if they solved this custody problem domestically, there would be a lot fewer international kidnapping cases.
User avatar
omae mona
 
Posts: 3184
Joined: Mon Aug 18, 2003 12:08 pm
Top

Postby FG Lurker » Sat Nov 07, 2009 11:56 pm

The Czech Republic is a Convention Country.

It seems rather unfair that a country that hasn't signed the convention (Japan) should be able to make use of it. Actually, it would be really fucked if Japan could make use of the convention without signing it -- there would be no benefit to Japan to signing if this is the case.
And you run and you run to catch up with the sun but it's sinking
Racing around to come up behind you again
The sun is the same in a relative way, but you're older
Shorter of breath and one day closer to death
User avatar
FG Lurker
 
Posts: 7854
Joined: Mon Nov 29, 2004 6:16 pm
Location: On the run
Top

Postby Screwed-down Hairdo » Sun Nov 08, 2009 1:03 am

omae mona wrote:I am sure no expert either. I wonder if your acquaintance's second husband (or the Japanese government) actually took the steps of filing an official grievance under Hague. If they did and the foreign country still didn't respond, that seems kind of strange. But maybe the Hague convention doesn't really have any effect. I have no idea.


Unfortunately, I don't know the details. But I get the feeling you might be right and that signatories would be obliged to act.

FG Lurker wrote: It seems rather unfair that a country that hasn't signed the convention (Japan) should be able to make use of it. Actually, it would be really fucked if Japan could make use of the convention without signing it -- there would be no benefit to Japan to signing if this is the case.


Which probably helps to explain why Japan hasn't signed.

What alarms me about the Hague is that many Japanese lawyers regarded (locally) as human rights crusaders are opposed to the country signing it.
User avatar
Screwed-down Hairdo
Maezumo
 
Posts: 6721
Joined: Wed May 20, 2009 7:03 pm
Top

Postby Christoff » Sun Nov 08, 2009 4:31 am

it is very unlikely that either government will engage in much diplomatic pressure over a domestic dispute. it seems highly unlikely that either government will remove their respective representatives over a trivial dispute when there are greater economic concerns at work
Mihi cura futuri
http://mevsavages.blogspot.com/
User avatar
Christoff
Maezumo
 
Posts: 828
Joined: Wed Dec 13, 2006 4:00 am
Location: Singapore Lor... Can? No can?
  • Website
Top

Postby Kanchou » Sun Nov 08, 2009 7:46 am

It figures that an Eastern European dude would succeed (for the time being) where an American failed miserably...
THE RADIOACTIVE FG!
Kanchou
Maezumo
 
Posts: 1290
Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2003 8:03 am
Location: Fuc'kedashima
Top

Postby Screwed-down Hairdo » Sun Nov 08, 2009 8:04 am

Christoff wrote:it is very unlikely that either government will engage in much diplomatic pressure over a domestic dispute. it seems highly unlikely that either government will remove their respective representatives over a trivial dispute when there are greater economic concerns at work


You would assume so, but Japanese governments have traditionally acted in the interests of their citizens, especially in situations where the perception is that the Japanese citizen has been wronged.
I wouldn't be surprised to see the Japanese government act to the extent that it will be able to "Czechmate" the foreign man involved. Let's not forget the Japanese tend to have one set of rules for themselves and another set for gaijin.
In the meantime, the tug-of-war is going to fry the brain of the poor little boy caught in the middle.
User avatar
Screwed-down Hairdo
Maezumo
 
Posts: 6721
Joined: Wed May 20, 2009 7:03 pm
Top

Postby Catoneinutica » Sun Nov 08, 2009 10:24 am

Screwed-down Hairdo wrote:You would assume so, but Japanese governments have traditionally acted in the interests of their citizens, especially in situations where the perception is that the Japanese citizen has been wronged.
I wouldn't be surprised to see the Japanese government act to the extent that it will be able to "Czechmate" the foreign man involved. Let's not forget the Japanese tend to have one set of rules for themselves and another set for gaijin.
In the meantime, the tug-of-war is going to fry the brain of the poor little boy caught in the middle.


Okay, we got a "Czechmate," but no "bouncing Czech" yet? C'mon guys!
"If there's a river, we'll dam it, and if there's a tree, we'll ram it - 'cause we Japanese are talkin' progress!"
User avatar
Catoneinutica
 
Posts: 1953
Joined: Tue Jan 24, 2006 12:23 pm
Top

Postby Screwed-down Hairdo » Sun Nov 08, 2009 10:33 am

Catoneinutica wrote:Okay, we got a "Czechmate," but no "bouncing Czech" yet? C'mon guys!


Hang on a second....I'm just Czeching out my bad pun dictionary to see if I can find anything more to use.
User avatar
Screwed-down Hairdo
Maezumo
 
Posts: 6721
Joined: Wed May 20, 2009 7:03 pm
Top

Postby Mike Oxlong » Sun Nov 08, 2009 10:58 am

•I prefer liberty with danger to peace with slavery.•
User avatar
Mike Oxlong
 
Posts: 6818
Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2004 5:47 pm
Location: 古き良き日本
Top

Postby Kanchou » Sun Nov 08, 2009 1:22 pm

Screwed-down Hairdo wrote:Hang on a second....I'm just Czeching out my bad pun dictionary to see if I can find anything more to use.


If she had gotten an abortion, it would have been a cancelled Czech...
THE RADIOACTIVE FG!
Kanchou
Maezumo
 
Posts: 1290
Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2003 8:03 am
Location: Fuc'kedashima
Top

Postby Samurai_Jerk » Sun Nov 08, 2009 1:30 pm

That JT story just doesn't Czech out.
Faith is believing what you know ain't so. -- Mark Twain
User avatar
Samurai_Jerk
Maezumo
 
Posts: 14387
Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2004 7:11 am
Location: Tokyo
Top

Postby Screwed-down Hairdo » Sun Nov 08, 2009 1:52 pm

It seems the couple have something of a Czech-ered past...
User avatar
Screwed-down Hairdo
Maezumo
 
Posts: 6721
Joined: Wed May 20, 2009 7:03 pm
Top

Postby TennoChinko » Sun Nov 08, 2009 4:18 pm

Screwed-down Hairdo wrote:Unfortunately, I don't know the details. But I get the feeling you might be right and that signatories would be obliged to act.



Which probably helps to explain why Japan hasn't signed.

What alarms me about the Hague is that many Japanese lawyers regarded (locally) as human rights crusaders are opposed to the country signing it.


For those lawyers, they probably don't see any hypocrisy whatsoever - for their definition of what constitutes human is Japanese. Gaijin = hinin
User avatar
TennoChinko
Maezumo
 
Posts: 1340
Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2006 9:33 am
Top

Postby sublight » Sun Nov 08, 2009 5:32 pm

Kanchou wrote:It figures that an Eastern European dude would succeed (for the time being) where an American failed miserably...

True, the American turned to his government for a handout, while the Eastern European simply took matters into his own hands.
I have a blog. Last update: August 18, 2013.
User avatar
sublight
 
Posts: 1228
Images: 5
Joined: Sun Mar 07, 2004 5:15 pm
Location: Basking by the Sumida
  • Website
  • Personal album
Top


Post a reply
19 posts • Page 1 of 1

Return to F*cked News

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 15 guests

  • Board index
  • The team • Delete all board cookies • All times are UTC + 9 hours
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group