You can't get any clearer than this:bikkle wrote:"Revised" to allow for self-defense? Has the SDF been unconstitutional or extra-constitutional all this time?
Aspiring sincerely to an international peace based on justice and order, the Japanese people forever renounce war as a sovereign right of the nation and the threat or use of force as means of settling international disputes. 2) In order to accomplish the aim of the preceding paragraph, land, sea, and air forces, as well as other war potential, will never be maintained. The right of belligerency of the state will not be recognized
And a more disturbing quote from an ex-leader of Minshuto:
Japan's Constitution should be revised to grant the emperor status as head of state
From the hand of MacArthur's staff, approved by the post-war Diet:
The Emperor shall be the symbol of the State and the unity of the people, deriving his position from the will of the people with whom resides sovereign power.
And article 20 (where all the issues of Koizumi's trips to Yasakuni are unconstitutional):
Freedom of religion is guaranteed to all. No religious organization shall receive any privileges from the State, nor exercise any political authority. 2) No person shall be compelled to take part in any religious acts, celebration, rite or practice. 3) The State and its organs shall refrain from religious education or any other religious activity.
I predict a return to the Meiji constitution in less than 5 years, maybe sooner if Jimento can push through a constitutional revision task force, and that won't be a pretty picture, as we're already seeing rumblings from Ishihara and ilk about Article 14:
All of the people are equal under the law and there shall be no discrimination in political, economic or social relations because of race, creed, sex, social status or family origin.