Home | Forums | Mark forums read | Search | FAQ | Login

Advanced search
Hot Topics
Buraku hot topic Multiculturalism on the rise?
Buraku hot topic Whats with all the Iranians?
Buraku hot topic Swapping Tokyo For Greenland
Buraku hot topic Japan Not Included in Analyst's List Of Top US Allies
Buraku hot topic Dutch wives for sale
Buraku hot topic Tokyo cab reaches NY from Argentina, meter running
Buraku hot topic Iran, DPRK, Nuke em, Like Japan
Buraku hot topic Stupid Youtube cunts cashing in on Logan Paul fiasco
Buraku hot topic Japanese Can't Handle Being Fucked In Paris
Buraku hot topic MARS...Let's Go!
Change font size
  • fuckedgaijin ‹ General ‹ F*cked News

JAL 787 on fire !!!! OMG WTF BBQ...

Odd news from Japan and all things Japanese around the world.
Post a reply
363 posts • Page 2 of 13 • 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 13

Re: JAL 787 on fire !!!! OMG WTF BBQ...

Postby wuchan » Wed Jan 16, 2013 5:18 pm

****GROUNDED****


Japan's two leading airlines grounded their fleets of Boeing 787s


http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/01/16/us-boeing-ana-idUSBRE90F01820130116
User avatar
wuchan
 
Posts: 2015
Joined: Tue Jun 17, 2008 11:19 pm
Location: tied to a chair in a closet at the local koban
Top

Re: JAL 787 on fire !!!! OMG WTF BBQ...

Postby yanpa » Wed Jan 16, 2013 5:18 pm

Harhar wrote:I will keep flying to Japan on dumpy old 767 and 777 United planes with cranky service staff. Not sure if ANA operates a 787 out of Dulles anyways.


You should be safe for a while:

The Grauniad wrote:787 emergency landing: Japan grounds entire Boeing Dreamliner fleet

Plane makes emergency landing at Takamatsu airport, western Japan, in latest safety scare for troubled new aircraft

Japan's largest airline, ANA, and its competitor JAL have each grounded their entire fleet of Boeing 787 Dreamliners after an emergency landing due to a smoke alarm in the cockpit – the most dramatic of a spate of incidents involving the troubled aircraft over the past week and since its inception.

All Nippon Airways said the plane had been evacuated, with its eight crew and all 129 passengers exiting safely on inflatable slides. Instruments in the cockpit indicated there had been a battery malfunction and the pilot had noticed a strange smell.


...moar...
User avatar
yanpa
 
Posts: 5671
Images: 11
Joined: Sun Nov 04, 2007 11:50 am
Location: Tokyo
Top

Re: JAL 787 on fire !!!! OMG WTF BBQ...

Postby Taro Toporific » Wed Jan 16, 2013 6:50 pm

DailyGomiuri_Promoting_Conservation.png
twitter.com/DailyGomiuri
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
User avatar
Taro Toporific
 
Posts: 10021532
Images: 0
Joined: Tue Sep 10, 2002 2:02 pm
Top

Re: JAL 787 on fire !!!! OMG WTF BBQ...

Postby Taro Toporific » Wed Jan 16, 2013 9:25 pm

chokonen888 wrote:I'm still waiting to see how many of the problems can be sourced to Japanese supplied components...


Deepening Crisis for the Dreamliner
NYTimes.com | 2013/01/17
...
The Japanese manufacturer GS Yuasa, which makes batteries for the Dreamliner, declined to comment on the jet’s troubles. Shares in the manufacturer, based in Kyoto, dropped 4.5 percent. Another Japanese company, Toray, which manufacturers the carbon fiber that reinforces the jet’s fuselage, fell 4.1 percent, while Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, which makes the wings, fell 3.2 percent...more...
User avatar
Taro Toporific
 
Posts: 10021532
Images: 0
Joined: Tue Sep 10, 2002 2:02 pm
Top

Re: JAL 787 on fire !!!! OMG WTF BBQ...

Postby Tsuru » Thu Jan 17, 2013 12:34 am

I recall saying the FAA was the regulatory equivalent of Wyatt Earp, after watching this and getting back on my chair I feel I have to revise this opinion slightly.



Regardless of the shit that went on at the supplier, accepting the non-conforming parts for fitting anyway, beating them with steel hammers to make them fit? Manually redrilling holes? Spraypainting the damaged parts green again so they look nice and original? What in the everloving fuck, Boeing? I had heard rumors of the same kind of managerial ham-handedness with regards to the 787 project, but this just blew me away.

With regards to the grounding: I had a funny feeling this was coming, and it definitely seems that grounding the Japanese fleet of dreamliners indefinitely was the right choice. It's probably only a matter of time until the grounding becomes global.

Kudos to ANA and JAL for taking decisive action, I has to be said that as it stands the grounding is voluntary: no government agency told them to do it.
Yokohammer wrote:They were saying on the news yesterday that the 787 is about 35% made in Japan.
While that is of course true, it still says "Boeing" on the side, and not "FHI" or "Yuasa". The fact that they use suppliers does not absolve Boeing of any responsibility. It is still their job to make sure every single complete aircraft is safe.
User avatar
Tsuru
 
Posts: 2408
Joined: Tue Jan 14, 2003 9:08 am
Location: Farcical Blingboddery
Top

Re: JAL 787 on fire !!!! OMG WTF BBQ...

Postby American Oyaji » Thu Jan 17, 2013 4:13 am

Yokohammer wrote:They were saying on the news yesterday that the 787 is about 35% made in Japan.


As opposed to HondaJet which is built in the USA?

It's a good thing they grounded these suckers.
User avatar
American Oyaji
 
Posts: 6540
Images: 0
Joined: Sun Oct 20, 2002 9:20 pm
Location: The Evidence of Things Unseen
  • ICQ
  • YIM
  • Personal album
Top

Re: JAL 787 on fire !!!! OMG WTF BBQ...

Postby Tsuru » Thu Jan 17, 2013 4:45 am

Video of the evacuation of the ANA 787, courtesy of one of the passengers.



[s]Water appears to be leaking from the aircraft right underneath where the main battery is located, which was the problem on this particular occasion. (The APU battery which was the problem in Boston is located behind the wing. The main bat is in the forward EE bay behind the nose gear) Could this mean there is an active fire/thermal suppression system? Time to hit those books again...[/s] Nope, just smoke coming out of the reverse-flow smoke evacuation system... the large-ish hole with the long streak trailing behind it. The mark on the ground appears to be a marking (number 2?) on the taxiway.
User avatar
Tsuru
 
Posts: 2408
Joined: Tue Jan 14, 2003 9:08 am
Location: Farcical Blingboddery
Top

Re: JAL 787 on fire !!!! OMG WTF BBQ...

Postby Coligny » Thu Jan 17, 2013 9:29 am

Water based fire suppression system on planes ? used for battery fires ? I know boeing went out of their way to fuck this plane... But that seems really hardcore...
User avatar
Coligny
 
Posts: 21818
Images: 10
Joined: Sat Jan 17, 2009 8:12 pm
Location: Mostly big mouth and bad ideas...
  • Website
  • Personal album
Top

Re: JAL 787 on fire !!!! OMG WTF BBQ...

Postby yanpa » Thu Jan 17, 2013 11:40 am

Salient thread on PPRuNe: http://www.pprune.org/rumours-news/5053 ... rning.html
User avatar
yanpa
 
Posts: 5671
Images: 11
Joined: Sun Nov 04, 2007 11:50 am
Location: Tokyo
Top

Re: JAL 787 on fire !!!! OMG WTF BBQ...

Postby Mike Oxlong » Thu Jan 17, 2013 12:46 pm

Tsuru wrote:
Yokohammer wrote:They were saying on the news yesterday that the 787 is about 35% made in Japan.

While that is of course true, it still says "Boeing" on the side, and not "FHI" or "Yuasa". The fact that they use suppliers does not absolve Boeing of any responsibility. It is still their job to make sure every single complete aircraft is safe.

Grounded Boeing 787 Dreamliners Use Lithium-Ion Batteries Made by a Japanese Company
The battery manufacturer GS Yuasa, based in Kyoto Prefecture, uses lithium cobalt oxide electrodes which are apparently prone to overheating...
•I prefer liberty with danger to peace with slavery.•
User avatar
Mike Oxlong
 
Posts: 6818
Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2004 5:47 pm
Location: 古き良き日本
Top

Re: JAL 787 on fire !!!! OMG WTF BBQ...

Postby matsuki » Thu Jan 17, 2013 1:38 pm

Mike Oxlong wrote:
Tsuru wrote:
Yokohammer wrote:They were saying on the news yesterday that the 787 is about 35% made in Japan.

While that is of course true, it still says "Boeing" on the side, and not "FHI" or "Yuasa". The fact that they use suppliers does not absolve Boeing of any responsibility. It is still their job to make sure every single complete aircraft is safe.

Grounded Boeing 787 Dreamliners Use Lithium-Ion Batteries Made by a Japanese Company
The battery manufacturer GS Yuasa, based in Kyoto Prefecture, uses lithium cobalt oxide electrodes which are apparently prone to overheating...


No doubt Boeing will have to take responsibility in the end...but dealing with factories/suppliers always comes with risk. I've had 1,000 units made of a product, asked for samples before sending payment, only to find out the samples were not taking from the 1,000 just made but a separate batch (and the 1,000 units were made with colors reversed because a manager at the factory, without consulting me, decided they were wrong) :wall:

I wouldn't be surprised to find that whatever testing is done to the batteries (if any) by Boeing did not reveal any problems with the batteries whereas the potential problems were foreseeable by GS Yuasa, possibly even discovered and they pulled some shit to cover it up. (Remember, TIJ)
User avatar
matsuki
 
Posts: 16045
Joined: Wed Feb 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Location: All Aisu deserves a good bukkake
Top

Re: JAL 787 on fire !!!! OMG WTF BBQ...

Postby Harhar » Thu Jan 17, 2013 3:26 pm

Now the FAA is grounding the plane: http://money.cnn.com/2013/01/16/news/co ... ce=cnn_bin That was front page news on CNN for like 3 minutes, and then we found out that Manti Te'O's girlfriend story was a hoax: http://www.cnn.com/2013/01/16/sport/man ... ?hpt=hp_t1 which took over
Harhar
Maezumo
 
Posts: 26
Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2012 11:31 am
Location: Washington, DC, 'merica
Top

Re: JAL 787 on fire !!!! OMG WTF BBQ...

Postby Coligny » Thu Jan 17, 2013 3:33 pm

chokonen888 wrote:I wouldn't be surprised to find that whatever testing is done to the batteries (if any) by Boeing did not reveal any problems with the batteries whereas the potential problems were foreseeable by GS Yuasa, possibly even discovered and they pulled some shit to cover it up. (Remember, TIJ)



Not to defend a Jap company... But LiPo problems traditionnally come from external factors/out of spec environement...

But must remember that Sony pioneered the whole "exploding battery" market few years ago...
User avatar
Coligny
 
Posts: 21818
Images: 10
Joined: Sat Jan 17, 2009 8:12 pm
Location: Mostly big mouth and bad ideas...
  • Website
  • Personal album
Top

Re: JAL 787 on fire !!!! OMG WTF BBQ...

Postby matsuki » Thu Jan 17, 2013 6:33 pm

Coligny wrote:
chokonen888 wrote:I wouldn't be surprised to find that whatever testing is done to the batteries (if any) by Boeing did not reveal any problems with the batteries whereas the potential problems were foreseeable by GS Yuasa, possibly even discovered and they pulled some shit to cover it up. (Remember, TIJ)



Not to defend a Jap company... But LiPo problems traditionnally come from external factors/out of spec environement...

But must remember that Sony pioneered the whole "exploding battery" market few years ago...


All I know is piercing them gives you instant fire :twisted:
User avatar
matsuki
 
Posts: 16045
Joined: Wed Feb 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Location: All Aisu deserves a good bukkake
Top

Re: JAL 787 on fire !!!! OMG WTF BBQ...

Postby Coligny » Thu Jan 17, 2013 6:40 pm

You really can't resist the urge to put your dick into anything that lay in front of you...

It will end badly someday...
User avatar
Coligny
 
Posts: 21818
Images: 10
Joined: Sat Jan 17, 2009 8:12 pm
Location: Mostly big mouth and bad ideas...
  • Website
  • Personal album
Top

Re: JAL 787 on fire !!!! OMG WTF BBQ...

Postby matsuki » Fri Jan 18, 2013 3:27 pm

Coligny wrote:You really can't resist the urge to put your dick into anything that lay in front of you...

It will end badly someday...


If I had tested that theory with my dick, I'd probably be splattered on all over the walls of an AKB concert. (might as well do the world a favor and take out as many pedophiles with me)
User avatar
matsuki
 
Posts: 16045
Joined: Wed Feb 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Location: All Aisu deserves a good bukkake
Top

Re: JAL 787 on fire !!!! The French Connection

Postby Mike Oxlong » Sat Jan 19, 2013 2:10 pm

Charred Lithium-Ion Battery in ANA's 787 Dreamliner
•I prefer liberty with danger to peace with slavery.•
User avatar
Mike Oxlong
 
Posts: 6818
Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2004 5:47 pm
Location: 古き良き日本
Top

Re: JAL 787 on fire !!!! OMG WTF BBQ...

Postby Coligny » Sat Jan 19, 2013 4:07 pm

Come on, Thales (ex Thomson CSF) would never do that on purpose... :lol: :keyboardcoffee: :rofl:
User avatar
Coligny
 
Posts: 21818
Images: 10
Joined: Sat Jan 17, 2009 8:12 pm
Location: Mostly big mouth and bad ideas...
  • Website
  • Personal album
Top

Re: JAL 787 on fire !!!! OMG WTF BBQ...

Postby matsuki » Mon Jan 21, 2013 5:42 pm

ehehe

GS Yuasa Searched by FAA, Japan Ministry After 787s Grounded

Jan. 21 (Bloomberg) -- Japan’s Transport Ministry and U.S. regulators searched GS Yuasa Corp.’s headquarters in Kyoto in a widening probe into battery faults that have grounded Boeing Co.’s 787 Dreamliner fleet.


Read more: http://www.sfgate.com/business/bloomber ... z2Ib7EHU4E
User avatar
matsuki
 
Posts: 16045
Joined: Wed Feb 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Location: All Aisu deserves a good bukkake
Top

Re: JAL 787 on fire !!!! OMG WTF BBQ...

Postby Coligny » Mon Jan 21, 2013 6:25 pm

Yea... try to send "us regulators" in Thales headquarter ... if they could bring their own bodybags for their ride back home that would be nice...
User avatar
Coligny
 
Posts: 21818
Images: 10
Joined: Sat Jan 17, 2009 8:12 pm
Location: Mostly big mouth and bad ideas...
  • Website
  • Personal album
Top

Re: JAL 787 on fire !!!! OMG WTF BBQ...

Postby GomiGirl » Wed Jan 23, 2013 4:19 pm

Japanese Company Made Battery That Caused Boeing 787 Fire

Recent trouble with Boeing’s 787 Dreamliner passenger jet – specifically its lithium-ion battery catching fire led to Japan grounding its fleet of 787 planes.

But… who makes the lithium-ion battery? Say hello to GS Yuasa Corp. which hoped its huge sale to Boeing would allow it to make its first profit from that style of battery.

You can see a YouTube Japanese-language news video of GS Yuasa seeing a big drop in its stock prices recently:



GomiGirl
The Keitai Goddess!!!
User avatar
GomiGirl
 
Posts: 9129
Joined: Fri Jul 05, 2002 3:56 pm
Location: Roamin' with my fave 12"!!
  • Website
Top

The French did it!

Postby Taro Toporific » Sun Jan 27, 2013 1:10 pm

JAPAN'S ROLE IN MAKING BATTERIES FOR BOEING QUESTIONED
Quid pro quo? 'Yes, absolutely. But no one will talk about it, and no one can prove it'
New York Times | January 25, 2013
As the search for the cause of smoldering batteries in Boeing’s grounded 787 Dreamliner continues, investigators and Congressional oversight committees may want to look into a related and potentially sensitive issue: how was the Japanese company GS Yuasa chosen to manufacture the innovative but now suspect lithium-ion batteries on the 787?
No one has claimed that GS Yuasa was chosen for the 787 on anything but merit. But Boeing has long been dogged by suspicions that in return for its awarding major contracts to Japanese companies, which also receive subsidies from Japan’s government, the country’s airlines buy Boeing aircraft almost exclusively...
...
Boeing added that “GS Yuasa provides the batteries under subcontract to Thales,” the French company responsible for the 787’s electrical systems...
More...
User avatar
Taro Toporific
 
Posts: 10021532
Images: 0
Joined: Tue Sep 10, 2002 2:02 pm
Top

Re: JAL 787 on fire !!!! OMG WTF BBQ...

Postby Coligny » Sun Jan 27, 2013 8:09 pm

A polite way to say that you do business in Japan like in every other 3rd world banana dictatorship...
User avatar
Coligny
 
Posts: 21818
Images: 10
Joined: Sat Jan 17, 2009 8:12 pm
Location: Mostly big mouth and bad ideas...
  • Website
  • Personal album
Top

Re: JAL 787 on fire !!!! OMG WTF BBQ...

Postby matsuki » Mon Jan 28, 2013 5:49 pm

TOKYO: Japan’s transport ministry said Monday safety inspectors had found no major problem on the production line making batteries for Boeing’s Dreamliner, further muddying the waters in a worldwide probe.

“We have found no major quality or technical problem,” an official at the ministry said on condition of anonymity, as Japanese and American safety inspectors ended a week-long probe at battery maker GS Yuasa.


http://www.nst.com.my/latest/japan-says ... t-1.209062

Not that I trust Japan's transport ministry (let alone an anonymous "official" there) but if not the batteries...then?
User avatar
matsuki
 
Posts: 16045
Joined: Wed Feb 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Location: All Aisu deserves a good bukkake
Top

Re: JAL 787 on fire !!!! OMG WTF BBQ...

Postby Coligny » Mon Jan 28, 2013 9:23 pm

act of god d00d...

Plus... if the doc posted by Tsuru is genuine...

...Trust no one mista Mulder...
User avatar
Coligny
 
Posts: 21818
Images: 10
Joined: Sat Jan 17, 2009 8:12 pm
Location: Mostly big mouth and bad ideas...
  • Website
  • Personal album
Top

Re: JAL 787 on fire !!!! OMG WTF BBQ...

Postby Tsuru » Tue Jan 29, 2013 8:00 am

Looking at the pictures of the two destroyed batteries I have to say that the blue steel casing actually did a pretty good job keeping the fire contained. The venturi smoke evac system did the rest in the case of the ANA jet... in the JAL case it of course was not working as the system requires the plane to be in the air. However you slice it the 787 will be back in the air fairly soon, the only thing is how Boeing and the FAA will decide to spin it. Maybe there will be a battery changeout to a safer type of lithium battery, but for now it seems they have painted themselves in a corner, demanding the installation of this type of Li unit when the aircraft was being developed. Backpedalling on this now will mean loss of face for the FAA as well as Boeing.

With regards to the Al Jaz documentary: I have no reason to suspect its allegations are unfounded. You don't take on a company the size of Boeing if you are not absolutely 100% sure you can prove what you are saying. You'll notice that at one point even the US military was involved investigating the subcontractor as they also procured these aircraft during that time in the form of the C-40A Clipper. They produced a comprehensive report with lots of findings, where before the FAA found nothing worth reporting. Someone wasn't looking hard enough, whether they did so on purpose or by accident is irrelevant. The Germans have a brilliant word for this: unfähig.
User avatar
Tsuru
 
Posts: 2408
Joined: Tue Jan 14, 2003 9:08 am
Location: Farcical Blingboddery
Top

Re: JAL 787 on fire !!!! OMG WTF BBQ...

Postby Coligny » Tue Jan 29, 2013 9:38 am

From what i got it's the APU starter battery pack. If it's the case... then... wtf... even on hybrid cars you don't use lipo for starters, you use lead acid... LiPo are excellent for long low/medium discharge rate... but when you enter the domain of high C ratings... you pay throught the nose... and replace often...

And... I 'm not comfortable with the idea of the 737NG being build worse than a chinese toy, and flawed in a way that just can't be fixed...
User avatar
Coligny
 
Posts: 21818
Images: 10
Joined: Sat Jan 17, 2009 8:12 pm
Location: Mostly big mouth and bad ideas...
  • Website
  • Personal album
Top

Re: JAL 787 on fire !!!! OMG WTF BBQ...

Postby Coligny » Thu Jan 31, 2013 8:11 pm

NTSB wrote: An NTSB spokesman said the board was aware of the reports of the prior battery problems and would review the data to see if it was relevant to the broader 787 probe.


Yeah... I hate people who jump to conclusions too... Maybe not as much as those who ignore the obvious though...

( Boeing 787 Battery Fire: Both ANA and JAL Had Replaced Batteries Last Year, on Multiple Occasions)
http://ex-skf.blogspot.jp/2013/01/boein ... a-and.html
Last edited by Coligny on Thu Jan 31, 2013 8:28 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Coligny
 
Posts: 21818
Images: 10
Joined: Sat Jan 17, 2009 8:12 pm
Location: Mostly big mouth and bad ideas...
  • Website
  • Personal album
Top

Re: JAL 787 on fire !!!! OMG WTF BBQ...

Postby Mike Oxlong » Thu Jan 31, 2013 8:21 pm

Elon Musk: Boeing 787 battery fundamentally unsafe
The lithium ion batteries installed on the Boeing 787 are inherently unsafe, says Elon Musk, founder of SpaceX and owner of electric car maker Tesla.

"Unfortunately, the pack architecture supplied to Boeing is inherently unsafe," writes Musk in an email to Flightglobal.

"Large cells without enough space between them to isolate against the cell-to-cell thermal domino effect means it is simply a matter of time before there are more incidents of this nature," he adds.

Both Boeing and Tesla use batteries fueled by lithium cobalt oxide, which is among the most energy-dense and flammable chemistries of lithium-ion batteries on the market. While Boeing elected to use a battery with a grouping of eight large cells, Tesla's batteries contain thousands of smaller cells that are independently separated to prevent fire in a single cell from harming the surrounding ones.

"Moreover, when thermal runaway occurs with a big cell, a proportionately larger amount of energy is released and it is very difficult to prevent that energy from then heating up the neighboring cells and causing a domino effect that results in the entire pack catching fire," says Musk.

An aerospace-capable version of Tesla's battery has been developed for use in SpaceX's Falcon 9 space launch vehicle. SpaceX, also owned by Musk, competes with Boeing/Lockheed Martin joint venture United Launch Alliance for customers. Boeing has thus far declined offers of assistance from Tesla and SpaceX, says Musk.

"They [Boeing] believe they have this under control, although I think there is a fundamental safety issue with the architecture of a pack with large cells," writes Musk in an email. "It is much harder to maintain an even temperature in a large cell, as the distance from the center of the cell to the edge is much greater, which increases the risk of thermal runaway."

Musk's assessments of battery cells were confirmed by Donald Sadoway, a professor of electrical engineering at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

"I would have used the same words," says Sadoway. "I'm glad someone with such a big reputation put it on the line."

"He's engineered [Tesla's battery] to prevent the domino effect, while Boeing evidently doesn't have that engineering," adds Sadoway...

Full article at Flightglobal
•I prefer liberty with danger to peace with slavery.•
User avatar
Mike Oxlong
 
Posts: 6818
Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2004 5:47 pm
Location: 古き良き日本
Top

Re: JAL 787 on fire !!!! OMG WTF BBQ...

Postby matsuki » Fri Feb 01, 2013 2:05 pm

So..basically the GS Yuasa batteries have been replaced several times and aren't safe in their current design. I'm surprised Boeing would gaman with this type of shit but I suspect they are stuck buying from GS Yuasa (at least for the moment) to keep the subsidies and to keep selling all these jets to Japan.
User avatar
matsuki
 
Posts: 16045
Joined: Wed Feb 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Location: All Aisu deserves a good bukkake
Top

PreviousNext

Post a reply
363 posts • Page 2 of 13 • 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 13

Return to F*cked News

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests

  • Board index
  • The team • Delete all board cookies • All times are UTC + 9 hours
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group