
Gotsu Footsoo uwaki senmon ya na....................aka Matsuki's type

Hot Topics | |
---|---|
kurogane wrote:Inquiring minds wanted to know:
Gotsu Footsoo uwaki senmon ya na....................aka Matsuki's type
Nozomi Nambu is Boxer Ikki Kotsugai’s Wife?
TennoChinko wrote:
Uh, I don't get it... that's apparently a photo of an AKB48 idol Yuki Kashiwagi and some other 'tarento' Yuya Tegoshi.
Was that supposed to be a photo of Ikki Kotsugai and his wife?
matsuki wrote:The lawyer was banging a married subordinate, noway he didn't know she is married. Not that it excuses what happened to him but he is no innocent victim. That being said, my point was that crazy meathead may have gone that far because he was told that it was rape by the wife...true or not.
Sent from my SO-03F using Tapatalk
Salty wrote:Just a fact check here - but did he just clip the short leg, or did he clip the little boys too? Somewhere I got the impression that everything was taken....
Samurai_Jerk wrote:Salty wrote:Just a fact check here - but did he just clip the short leg, or did he clip the little boys too? Somewhere I got the impression that everything was taken....
At first I thought it was the whole package because the article said emasculation but I read another that implied it was just the penis. Either way it's not good.
dimwit wrote:Samurai_Jerk wrote:Salty wrote:Just a fact check here - but did he just clip the short leg, or did he clip the little boys too? Somewhere I got the impression that everything was taken....
At first I thought it was the whole package because the article said emasculation but I read another that implied it was just the penis. Either way it's not good.
You seem to have a great deal of sympathy for the victim but I always think screwing around is like playing golf. Some holes are very forgiving, while others are penal.
Samurai_Jerk wrote:dimwit wrote:Samurai_Jerk wrote:Salty wrote:Just a fact check here - but did he just clip the short leg, or did he clip the little boys too? Somewhere I got the impression that everything was taken....
At first I thought it was the whole package because the article said emasculation but I read another that implied it was just the penis. Either way it's not good.
You seem to have a great deal of sympathy for the victim but I always think screwing around is like playing golf. Some holes are very forgiving, while others are penal.
If your partner cheats on you, it's only your partner's fault unless the other man/woman is a friend or family member. He should have carved out his bitch's vagina if she was indeed cheating.
Salty wrote:Samurai_Jerk wrote:dimwit wrote:Samurai_Jerk wrote:Salty wrote:Just a fact check here - but did he just clip the short leg, or did he clip the little boys too? Somewhere I got the impression that everything was taken....
At first I thought it was the whole package because the article said emasculation but I read another that implied it was just the penis. Either way it's not good.
You seem to have a great deal of sympathy for the victim but I always think screwing around is like playing golf. Some holes are very forgiving, while others are penal.
If your partner cheats on you, it's only your partner's fault unless the other man/woman is a friend or family member. He should have carved out his bitch's vagina if she was indeed cheating.
I disagree with that logic. Given that the lawyer was a co-employee, and maybe a superior - he had a duty (IMO) to stay away, even if approached by the woman. A man off the street, in a bar, etc. - who would have no way of knowing she was married - then I would agree with you. Not that I condone the clip job....
Coligny wrote:Salty wrote:Samurai_Jerk wrote:dimwit wrote:Samurai_Jerk wrote:Salty wrote:Just a fact check here - but did he just clip the short leg, or did he clip the little boys too? Somewhere I got the impression that everything was taken....
At first I thought it was the whole package because the article said emasculation but I read another that implied it was just the penis. Either way it's not good.
You seem to have a great deal of sympathy for the victim but I always think screwing around is like playing golf. Some holes are very forgiving, while others are penal.
If your partner cheats on you, it's only your partner's fault unless the other man/woman is a friend or family member. He should have carved out his bitch's vagina if she was indeed cheating.
I disagree with that logic. Given that the lawyer was a co-employee, and maybe a superior - he had a duty (IMO) to stay away, even if approached by the woman. A man off the street, in a bar, etc. - who would have no way of knowing she was married - then I would agree with you. Not that I condone the clip job....
Could we just agree on the fact that it takes two to tango ?
Salty wrote:I disagree with that logic. Given that the lawyer was a co-employee, and maybe a superior - he had a duty (IMO) to stay away, even if approached by the woman. A man off the street, in a bar, etc. - who would have no way of knowing she was married - then I would agree with you. Not that I condone the clip job....
Samurai_Jerk wrote:Salty wrote:I disagree with that logic. Given that the lawyer was a co-employee, and maybe a superior - he had a duty (IMO) to stay away, even if approached by the woman. A man off the street, in a bar, etc. - who would have no way of knowing she was married - then I would agree with you. Not that I condone the clip job....
Did he have a duty to stay away because he knew she was married or because they worked together? Would that duty still be there if she had a boyfriend? Would it matter whether that boyfriend was living with her or not? What about a one night stand with someone on vacation who tells you they're married but you'll never see again?
I'm not saying it's a good idea to fuck married people but I am saying that it's 2015 and spouses aren't property (at least not in the first world). People cheat for a lot of reasons and find all kinds of ways to justify it. Some cheat because they just don't care. Some might actually have a "good" reason like a sexless loveless marriage but they get along well enough and want to stay together for the kids. The excuse that I met her in a bar and didn't know she was married doesn't fly. If you care about these kinds of things, you should as least ask before sticking your dick in someone.
Salty wrote:Samurai_Jerk wrote: From personal experience - I turned down many (and all) offers - from married ladies as well as singles. They were subordinates/co-workers, and I was married, and I didn`t need future trouble on either side. I also fired both parties when I was able to do so.
.
Salty wrote:I turned down many ... offers
Samurai_Jerk wrote:Anyway, even if the lawyer was fucking the guy's wife he's a victim period. It doesn't matter why the other guy did it.
matsuki wrote: Not saying he deserved the snip (just imagine how fucked life would be without a penis...I wouldn't wish that on my worst enemy), just saying he's far from an "innocent victim" here.
matsuki wrote:Samurai_Jerk wrote:Anyway, even if the lawyer was fucking the guy's wife he's a victim period. It doesn't matter why the other guy did it.
It might seem justified to some if there was rape involved (that whole punishment fits the crime feminazi castration mentality) and the wife may be held criminally liable if she cried false rape to the husband. That being said, we don't know those kinds of details yet so fair enough, I'll stop speculating.
Whether you think it's fine in 2015, there is a ton of legal/financial/personal risk when having these kind of relations with a married subordinate. He could lose his job/career, he could expect a lawsuit from the husband, if he's married, he could lose the wife and all kinds of stuff there. I'm pretty sure he didn't imagine he was risking his manhood but even in sheepish Japan, a violent confrontation with an angered husband isn't out of the realm of possibilities...especially a dude who is an ex boxer. You also can't say his behavior had nothing to do with what happened. He definitely got more crazy than he gambled on but he brought that crazy upon himself. Not saying he deserved the snip (just imagine how fucked life would be without a penis...I wouldn't wish that on my worst enemy), just saying he's far from an "innocent victim" here.
Samurai_Jerk wrote:By the way, can anyone of you moralists explain to me why so many guys think it's wrong to fuck married women but have no problem fucking women with boyfriends?
Samurai_Jerk wrote:matsuki wrote:Samurai_Jerk wrote:Anyway, even if the lawyer was fucking the guy's wife he's a victim period. It doesn't matter why the other guy did it.
It might seem justified to some if there was rape involved (that whole punishment fits the crime feminazi castration mentality) and the wife may be held criminally liable if she cried false rape to the husband. That being said, we don't know those kinds of details yet so fair enough, I'll stop speculating.
Whether you think it's fine in 2015, there is a ton of legal/financial/personal risk when having these kind of relations with a married subordinate. He could lose his job/career, he could expect a lawsuit from the husband, if he's married, he could lose the wife and all kinds of stuff there. I'm pretty sure he didn't imagine he was risking his manhood but even in sheepish Japan, a violent confrontation with an angered husband isn't out of the realm of possibilities...especially a dude who is an ex boxer. You also can't say his behavior had nothing to do with what happened. He definitely got more crazy than he gambled on but he brought that crazy upon himself. Not saying he deserved the snip (just imagine how fucked life would be without a penis...I wouldn't wish that on my worst enemy), just saying he's far from an "innocent victim" here.
I didn't say his behavior didn't lead to this or that it's fine to fuck married people and none of those other risks have anything to do with this. I'm saying that if your spouse is cheating on you it's a problem between you and your spouse and if they weren't fucking that person they'd be fucking someone else. Focusing your anger on your spouse's lover is stupid and ignores the real issue. If this actually was just an office fling and meathead though someone needed to be physically punished, he should have removed his wife's genitals and maybe his own for not satisfying her. Assigning blame to the victim here is like blaming the rape victim for dressing like whore, having one too many shots of Jager, and making out with every guy at the bar. Sure she have been more careful but in the end the guys who ran the train on her are 100% at fault (and no I'm not talking about those grey areas where two people get drunk and fuck but for some reason only the man is the rapist).
By the way, can anyone of you moralists explain to me why so many guys think it's wrong to fuck married women but have no problem fucking women with boyfriends?
Coligny wrote:Salty wrote:Samurai_Jerk wrote: From personal experience - I turned down many (and all) offers - from married ladies as well as singles. They were subordinates/co-workers, and I was married, and I didn`t need future trouble on either side. I also fired both parties when I was able to do so.
.
Holy shit... French unemployment rate would reach 100% if we'd let nazis like you in charge of the workforce...
And your ass would also be on the firing range for breaching labour laws.
It's called "workplace dynamics" in non feudal societies...
Wage Slave wrote:Samurai_Jerk wrote:By the way, can anyone of you moralists explain to me why so many guys think it's wrong to fuck married women but have no problem fucking women with boyfriends?
And also why it's OK and even admirable for married men to fuck other women as long as the women aren't married?
Salty wrote:Wage Slave wrote:Samurai_Jerk wrote:By the way, can anyone of you moralists explain to me why so many guys think it's wrong to fuck married women but have no problem fucking women with boyfriends?
And also why it's OK and even admirable for married men to fuck other women as long as the women aren't married?
Who said that is admirable?
Wage Slave wrote:Salty wrote:Wage Slave wrote:Samurai_Jerk wrote:By the way, can anyone of you moralists explain to me why so many guys think it's wrong to fuck married women but have no problem fucking women with boyfriends?
And also why it's OK and even admirable for married men to fuck other women as long as the women aren't married?
Who said that is admirable?
Have you never seen married men boasting of their exploits to an apparently appreciative audience?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests