Hot Topics | |
---|---|
chibaka wrote:Coligny wrote:WS... That's quite a stupid comparison...
I can collect as many cars in my bunker without paying any fee as long as I don't use them on public roads. I cann even drive them on track days or in my field if I want.
Property taxe if you are the owner just mean you have one less leach to pay to keep your stuff.
And if you have to pay to keep sumthing, it's not yours. Ask any sugar daddy about that issue.
And you can sell the car after a week for double your purchase price, no one cares....
Coligny wrote:Even Russian mail order brides ?
chibaka wrote:Property tax pays for local services does it not? Capital gains is pure thievery. With house prices here heading in the downward direction, it's not something I'm worried about.
Wage Slave wrote:Do we have to pay capital gains tax on your main residence in Japan? You don't in the UK. Anyway fat chance for most anyway.
chibaka wrote:Wage Slave wrote:Do we have to pay capital gains tax on your main residence in Japan? You don't in the UK. Anyway fat chance for most anyway.
I think theoretically here, there maybe capital gains, not much chance of that though. UK has no capital gains tax on your main property, if you are fortunate enough to have a second house, that would be taxed.
Samurai_Jerk wrote:Wage Slave wrote:Samurai_Jerk wrote:I actually have a problem with property tax since it basically means there is no true ownership by individuals
I'm not with you. How's that?
If you have to pay taxes to keep your property, you don't own it. You're just renting it.
Samurai_Jerk wrote:Wage Slave wrote:Samurai_Jerk wrote:I actually have a problem with property tax since it basically means there is no true ownership by individuals
I'm not with you. How's that?
If you have to pay taxes to keep your property, you don't own it. You're just renting it.
Wage Slave wrote:Regarding Japanese capital gains tax on your primary residence. It appears you are liable but only for capital gain in excess of 30 million after deducting both buying and selling costs. That can include demolition costs.
So, unless the property was bought way back in the 60s or something and is in a prime location there will be nothing to pay.
Salty wrote:Samurai_Jerk wrote:Wage Slave wrote:Samurai_Jerk wrote:I actually have a problem with property tax since it basically means there is no true ownership by individuals
I'm not with you. How's that?
If you have to pay taxes to keep your property, you don't own it. You're just renting it.
IMO - that is a good way to look at it. You only `own` the right to hold it and manage it so long as you abide by the society rules - pay your taxes, keep it in a safe condition, and in some jurisdictions - keep it looking similar to others in the same area. The land itself is simply rented from society and held for the next generation.
matsuki wrote:So I talked to my friend and apparently his side business was under the 200,000Yen requirement to report...but "the tax dude was still an unrelenting asshole, determined to find something on this ayashii gaijin."
wangta wrote: Seems to me that yes the Jp authorities do want to go after gaijin as they see us collectively as a soft touch.
wagyl wrote:People who post here are entitled to wear their coats of persecution if they wish, but in my view it is more than a little conceited to regard yourself as primary targets in anything the tax authorities do.
More and more this board is feeling like a foreigner's bubble, an echo chamber with little input from the real world.
Without irony, I think we occasionally need a prick for that bubble.
wagyl wrote:Not that "everyone is doing it" is ever an adequate defence, I think you will find that creative accountancy is just as common if not more common among the Japanese population who can get away with it (i.e. the non-salaryman) as it is among the foreign population with the same capacity. I also think you will find that the gains to be made by cracking down are greater among the Japanese population than the foreign population.
People who post here are entitled to wear their coats of persecution if they wish, but in my view it is more than a little conceited to regard yourself as primary targets in anything the tax authorities do.
More and more this board is feeling like a foreigner's bubble, an echo chamber with little input from the real world.
Without irony, I think we occasionally need a prick for that bubble.
kurogane wrote:wagyl wrote:People who post here are entitled to wear their coats of persecution if they wish, but in my view it is more than a little conceited to regard yourself as primary targets in anything the tax authorities do.
More and more this board is feeling like a foreigner's bubble, an echo chamber with little input from the real world.
Without irony, I think we occasionally need a prick for that bubble.
Beautiful. Couldn't agree more. Wangta used the words Bloke and Mate in the same post so I automatically assumed Lesser White in Asia Persecution Complex (LWAPC!!), but I think this extends to us First Worlds whites as well. At an anecdotal level, there might be prissy and pissy individual officials, but the idea that whites think they are under the gun shows how sad whites in Japan are.
kurogane wrote:Super Grover fell into the ditch he dug himself and then screamed because the filthy chinks wouldn't give him a free ladder out of it. As dear as a man as he is, he fucked that up so royally it was shameful. He was evading taxes. There was no other word for what he did. We might not use Mate or Bloke, but we can hillbilly with the best of them as needed, and he did just that. Feck I hate hillbillies, now that you mention it. Not him, natch. He was loveable.
Other than that, you might be half right. If you could write a whole sentence in First World English we'd know for sure. Except about the skin colour bit. That showed how white you are, even if not First World white. Only racists use that sad quibble.
wangta wrote:But Ken44 wasn't pompous. Just deluded. I might be doing Waygl a disservice but his way of lecturing, er writing, reminds me of a poster who used to have the same kind of writing style. You know, a pseudo professorial style that is a different kind of trolling, the way Waygl trolls certain posters.
wangta wrote: on the turps
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 3 guests