Hot Topics | |
---|---|
Mulboyne wrote:...That strict policy means dinner sometimes has to be canceled. If Takayama is sick, the 26-seat restaurant is closed. If there's a problem with the shipment of fish - flown in from Japan - he can't cook
Neo-Rio wrote:Mulboyne wrote:...That strict policy means dinner sometimes has to be canceled. If Takayama is sick, the 26-seat restaurant is closed. If there's a problem with the shipment of fish - flown in from Japan - he can't cook
NO SUSHI FOR YOU!
dingosatemybaby wrote:Neo-Rio wrote:NO SUSHI FOR YOU!
Yeah, Sushi Nazi indeed. My sister says there's some sushi place in LA where the fascist chef expects you to down your sushi in one gulp. It's the "proper" way, apparently. Or at least HE thinks so.
Charles wrote:Yeah, the infamous Sushi Nazi, I used to work right across the street from there
kamome wrote:Charles wrote:Yeah, the infamous Sushi Nazi, I used to work right across the street from there
What was your job in Studio City?
Big Booger wrote:No sushi is worth $350 a person to me.. I could afford it, but why would I want to try it? screw that.. give me kaiten all the way baby!
Tequila wrote:Exactly. I mean, what is all the extra money for? We really only taste the main flavours of the fish, rice, wasabi and soy sauce, so how can more money help? It may be slightly fresher fish etc, but what taste difference is worth literally hundreds of dollars for one meal?
Samurai_Jerk wrote:I don't know specifically about this restaurant, but there can be a big difference between a regular meal and a meal that costs hundreds of dollars.
Big Booger wrote:Charles hit it.. it's an experience you are paying for.. yeah the sushi might be fresher.. It may even be served with more care.. cut just a certain way.. the chef is semi-famous.. the place is upscale.. but I don't give two shits about any of that... apart from the freshness...
Charles wrote:Big Booger wrote:Charles hit it.. it's an experience you are paying for.. yeah the sushi might be fresher.. It may even be served with more care.. cut just a certain way.. the chef is semi-famous.. the place is upscale.. but I don't give two shits about any of that... apart from the freshness...
Well, there are a lot of people who live completely unlike you and I, where $500 for a meal means nothing. Go pick up a Neiman-Marcus catalog and you'll see what I mean, I'm talking about people who spend $2000 for a pair of shoes.
The $1500/person sushi place I mentioned was infamous because it was the kind of place where Japanese corporate executives would take a client and charge it to their expense account. Those days are long gone. And even then, nobody ever bought their OWN sushi dinner for $1500 out of their OWN pocket.
Big Booger wrote:Charles wrote:Big Booger wrote:Charles hit it.. it's an experience you are paying for.. yeah the sushi might be fresher.. It may even be served with more care.. cut just a certain way.. the chef is semi-famous.. the place is upscale.. but I don't give two shits about any of that... apart from the freshness...
Well, there are a lot of people who live completely unlike you and I, where $500 for a meal means nothing. Go pick up a Neiman-Marcus catalog and you'll see what I mean, I'm talking about people who spend $2000 for a pair of shoes.
The $1500/person sushi place I mentioned was infamous because it was the kind of place where Japanese corporate executives would take a client and charge it to their expense account. Those days are long gone. And even then, nobody ever bought their OWN sushi dinner for $1500 out of their OWN pocket.
Sad... those people are sad.. they overvalue goods.. Certainly wealth shouldn't equate with waste. A case of okane MOTTAINAI
Corporate whore-mongering aside.. I will retract a statement I made.. I said I would never, when I really meant I might not ever..Depends on how good it really is....
I suppose if you are ultra-rich, this would be a drop in the bucket?? Pocket change.. no sweat off the scrotum..
Samurai_Jerk wrote:Let me tell you there is a HUGE difference between --for example-- getting a $15 steak dinner at a sports bar and $150 one at nice steak house. The difference is in the quality of beef and the way it's prepared.
Samurai_Jerk wrote:No, price doesn't make something better, but there is often a reason that a place charges more for food. I've been to relatively expensive restaurants where the food is mediocre and cheap dives that have some of the best stuff I've ever had. But I think that really depends on what kind of food you're eating.
Samurai_Jerk wrote:But there was a major difference in the quality, taste, and type of fish and nihonshu I got to try. The down side is that since then I haven't been able to enjoy the average sushi and sashimi that I can normally afford as much as I used to. Who knows? Maybe a $500 sushi dinner would be that much better.
Naniwan Kid wrote:I agrue about this all the time.
10 dollar steak = crap
20 dollar steak = decent
30 dollar steak = damn good
40 dollar steak = great
50 dollar streak = wow, tastes like a 30 or 40 dollar steak. Wait a minute...
70 dollar steak = Gee, this is great. It almost tastes as good as a 30 or 40 dollar steak. Oh crap....
Samurai_Jerk wrote:Big Booger, I don't know why you think people are sad that spend a lot of money on fine restaurants. Some would say it's excessive to spend $25 on dinner when you can cook at home for less than five. It's all relative to what you have and what you're into. I don't understand why people spend thousands of dollars on ski equipment because I've never been skiing and have no real desire to. Other people would say I'm crazy to have around $1000 worth of athletic gear for the shit I'm into. I say we're just spending money on what we enjoy.
Samurai_Jerk wrote:Well, BB, following your logic we should all live as cheaply as possible regardless of income, never spend money on luxuries, and donate as much as possilbe to charity. Every time I drink a beer or got to a movie I'm spending money on things that I don't need.
prolly wrote:....can get equitable sushi/bangohan at other NY places like Nobu (a tourist trap but still excellent food) and [color="Red"]Megu.[/color]
.
Taro Toporific wrote:Ex-Waitress Sues Megu for Sex Harassment
New York Magazine - Sept 20
A sexual-harassment lawsuit filed today by a former waitress for Megu, the Tribeca outpost of the high-end Japanese restaurant empire, is hot enough to melt the place's trademark Buddha ice sculpture. The ex-waitress, Satomi Southward, a 31-year-old single mother described by her lawyer as "demure, pretty, with long hair," is seeking $20 million in compensatory and punitive damages from the restaurant (which earned two stars from the Times) and its parent company, Food Scope America...more....
---[color="Red"]lawsuit copy[/color]---
IkemenTommy wrote:Right... 20 million dollars... right...
Even if she does win the case (in the most remote circumstances), the judge will throw it out and reduce it to 20 thousand.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests