Home | Forums | Mark forums read | Search | FAQ | Login

Advanced search
Hot Topics
Buraku hot topic Iran, DPRK, Nuke em, Like Japan
Buraku hot topic This is the bomb!
Buraku hot topic Massive earthquake hits Indonesia, Tsunami kills thousands.
Buraku hot topic Japanese jazz pianist beaten up on NYC subway
Buraku hot topic Japan finally heading back to 3rd World Status? LOL
Buraku hot topic Fleeing from the dungeon
Buraku hot topic Why Has This File Been Locked for 92 Years?
Buraku hot topic 'Paris Syndrome' strikes Japanese
Buraku hot topic There'll be fewer cows getting off that Qantas flight
Buraku hot topic Japan will fingerprint and photograph all foreigners!
Change font size
  • fuckedgaijin ‹ General ‹ F*cked News

Agency May Tighten Seat Belts

Odd news from Japan and all things Japanese around the world.
Post a reply
10 posts • Page 1 of 1

Agency May Tighten Seat Belts

Postby Mulboyne » Sat Jun 10, 2006 11:26 pm

[floatr]Image[/floatr]Yomiuri: NPA may make seat belts compulsory in back seats
The fatality rate of back seat passengers not wearing seat belts was about four times higher than that of those wearing a seat belt in traffic accidents in 2005, according to the National Police Agency...less than 10 percent of back seat passengers, who are not legally required to wear seat belts, used them...An agency survey of accidents involving fatalities and injuries in which back seat passengers had been wearing seat belts revealed that 25 such passengers died in 23,035 accidents--a fatality rate of 0.11 percent.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
User avatar
Mulboyne
 
Posts: 18608
Joined: Thu May 06, 2004 1:39 pm
Location: London
Top

Postby otakuden » Tue Jun 13, 2006 11:54 pm

wow. i didn't realize the japanese weren't required to wear back seat seatbelts. concept: they save lives in the front seats, so why wouldn't the back seats be any diff :-P
it's always 5 o'clock somewhere :kanpai:
User avatar
otakuden
Maezumo
 
Posts: 183
Joined: Fri May 05, 2006 7:30 pm
Location: Florida
  • Website
  • YIM
Top

Postby Mulboyne » Wed Mar 26, 2008 12:06 pm

Yomiuri: Rear seat belts could be dangerous
Four accidents involving rear seat belts of cars have occurred over the past 10 years, according to a survey by the National Consumer Affairs Center. In all cases, the seat belts were equipped with a special apparatus designed to hold a child seat in place, and in one case a boy was nearly strangled with a seat belt, it said. Passengers riding in the backseat will be required to buckle up under the revised Road Traffic Law to be enforced in June. The NCAC is working to make consumers aware of the dangers of the seat belt. According to the center, a fourth-grade primary school student of Aichi Prefecture nearly strangled when he wound a rear seat belt around his neck in December 2006.
User avatar
Mulboyne
 
Posts: 18608
Joined: Thu May 06, 2004 1:39 pm
Location: London
Top

Postby pbm » Wed Mar 26, 2008 1:40 pm

hmm whats safer.

let me think. having 2 kids in the back seat strapped in while you hit that car in front at 40kmh.

how about 2 fat drunk guys in the backwithout seat belts, flying all over the car while you roll over a few times down a hill.

give me the money they spent on these brainless surveys. put those seat belts on the kids.
pbm
Maezumo
 
Posts: 40
Joined: Sat Dec 09, 2006 10:36 pm
Top

Postby Gilligan » Wed Mar 26, 2008 3:04 pm

According to the center, a fourth-grade primary school student of Aichi Prefecture nearly strangled when he wound a rear seat belt around his neck in December 2006.


Yes, yes. Clearly the problem here lies with the seatbelt.
User avatar
Gilligan
Maezumo
 
Posts: 1029
Joined: Fri May 19, 2006 10:09 pm
Location: The Big Nag
Top

Mmmm

Postby kurohinge1 » Wed Mar 26, 2008 3:42 pm

Gilligan wrote:
According to the center, a fourth-grade primary school student of Aichi Prefecture nearly strangled when he wound a rear seat belt around his neck in December 2006.
Yes, yes. Clearly the problem here lies with the seatbelt.


If only cars had a stewardess to show you how those tricky belts are supposed to be used!

Image

;)
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
  • "This is the verdict: . . . " (John 3:19-21)
  • "It could be that the purpose of your life is only to serve as a warning to others" (Anon)
User avatar
kurohinge1
Maezumo
 
Posts: 2745
Joined: Fri Apr 11, 2003 12:52 pm
Location: Sydney, Australia
Top

Postby ttjereth » Wed Mar 26, 2008 8:35 pm

[quote="kurohinge1"]If only cars had a stewardess to show you how those tricky belts are supposed to be used!

Image

]

That would then shift the conversation:
The fatality rate of back seat passengers:banana: The fertility rate of back seat passengers

Ready made FG reply message below, copy, paste and fill in the blanks or select the appropriate items:
[color=DarkRed][size=84][size=75]But in [/SIZE]
[/color][/SIZE](SOME OTHER FUCKING PLACE WE AREN'T TALKING ABOUT) the (NOUN) is also (ADJECTIVE), so you are being ([font=Times New Roman][size=84][color=DarkRed][size=75]RACIST/ANTI-JAPANESE/NAZI/BLAH BLAH BLAH) just because (BLAH BLAH BLAH) is (OPTIONAL PREPOSITION) (JAPAN/JAPANESE)"[/SIZE]
:p
[/color][/SIZE][/font]
User avatar
ttjereth
Maezumo
 
Posts: 1862
Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 1:42 pm
Location: Tokyo
Top

Postby ttjereth » Wed Mar 26, 2008 8:36 pm

By the way, at the risk of actually posting on topic once in awhile, when I recently renewed my driver's license we were told that the law was now that rear seatbelt were required on the highway and they could stop you to check/ticket you for passengers not wearing them.

Ready made FG reply message below, copy, paste and fill in the blanks or select the appropriate items:
[color=DarkRed][size=84][size=75]But in [/SIZE]
[/color][/SIZE](SOME OTHER FUCKING PLACE WE AREN'T TALKING ABOUT) the (NOUN) is also (ADJECTIVE), so you are being ([font=Times New Roman][size=84][color=DarkRed][size=75]RACIST/ANTI-JAPANESE/NAZI/BLAH BLAH BLAH) just because (BLAH BLAH BLAH) is (OPTIONAL PREPOSITION) (JAPAN/JAPANESE)"[/SIZE]
:p
[/color][/SIZE][/font]
User avatar
ttjereth
Maezumo
 
Posts: 1862
Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 1:42 pm
Location: Tokyo
Top

Postby Taro Toporific » Sun Apr 06, 2008 11:01 am

ttjereth wrote:...when I recently renewed my driver's license we were told that the law was now that rear seatbelt were required on the highway and they could stop you to check/ticket you for passengers not wearing them.

[floatl]Image[/floatl]
Japan Requires Rear Passengers To Be Strapped
April 5, 2008 12:25 p.m. EST
Tokyo, Japan (AHN) -
Beginning June 1, all Japanese back seat passengers in vehicles must also wear seat belts like those seated on the front row. But violators would be fined if they are only caught unstrapped while on expressways...more...
User avatar
Taro Toporific
 
Posts: 10021532
Images: 0
Joined: Tue Sep 10, 2002 2:02 pm
Top

Postby Mulboyne » Sat Sep 20, 2008 11:11 pm

Yomiuri: Police tighten seat belt rule / Tickets, not warnings, set for unbelted backseat riders on expwys
The National Police Agency instructed prefectural police headquarters Friday to start ticketing drivers on expressways that have backseat passengers riding without seat belts, starting next month, changing the previous policy of only giving warnings to such drivers. In June, the revised Road Traffic Law went into force. It requires all backseat automobile passengers, excluding pregnant women and some others, to wear seat belts. The regulation applies for vehicles on all roads, but drivers will only be ticketed for having unbelted backseat passengers while on expressways. Each ticket will not carry a monetary fine, but will issue a penalty point on the driver's license. A license can be suspended if a point ceiling is exceeded. The NPA plans to inform the public of the new policy through its annual autumn traffic safety campaign period between Sunday and Tuesday. According to a survey conducted last October by the NPA and the Japan Automobile Federation, only 13.5 percent of backseat passengers wore seat belts. The NPA ordered prefectural police only to warn drivers when they are caught having unbelted backseat passengers, instead of ticketing the drivers, as a kind of grace period for drivers to become used to getting passengers to buckle up before ticketing would be implemented.

In surveys carried out by prefectural police across the country between June and August, the NPA confirmed more backseat passengers were wearing seat belts. The Fukuoka prefectural police's survey found the rate grew from 6.8 percent before the enforcement of the revised law to 77. According to latest surveys, 66 percent, 72.9 percent and 73 percent of backseat passengers in Ishikawa, Hiroshima and Nagasaki prefectures, respectively, were found to be wearing seat belts. However, according to the NPA, local police are instructed not to set up checkpoints intended solely to catch unbelted backseat passengers. If police spot an unbelted backseat passenger when cracking down on other violations such as speeding, drunk driving or reckless driving, the NPA has told police forces to ticket the driver for having unbelted backseat passengers on an expressway. On other general roads, police are to maintain the initial policy of only warning drivers, according to the NPA. "Seat belts are highly effective in protecting the lives of backseat passengers as well, so we hope people wear them even when they're in backseats," a representative of the NPA's Traffic Planning Division said.
User avatar
Mulboyne
 
Posts: 18608
Joined: Thu May 06, 2004 1:39 pm
Location: London
Top


Post a reply
10 posts • Page 1 of 1

Return to F*cked News

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 24 guests

  • Board index
  • The team • Delete all board cookies • All times are UTC + 9 hours
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group