Salty wrote:matsuki wrote:Offer Poison Pho to the Chinese?
Pho and poison in the same sentence is redundant....
Whatchoo talkin' 'bout?
Hot Topics | |
---|---|
Salty wrote:matsuki wrote:Offer Poison Pho to the Chinese?
Pho and poison in the same sentence is redundant....
Samurai_Jerk wrote:Salty wrote:matsuki wrote:Offer Poison Pho to the Chinese?
Pho and poison in the same sentence is redundant....
Whatchoo talkin' 'bout?
matsuki wrote:Samurai_Jerk wrote:Salty wrote:matsuki wrote:Offer Poison Pho to the Chinese?
Pho and poison in the same sentence is redundant....
Whatchoo talkin' 'bout?
He can't handle Pho? I love that shit!
Salty wrote:matsuki wrote:Samurai_Jerk wrote:Salty wrote:matsuki wrote:Offer Poison Pho to the Chinese?
Pho and poison in the same sentence is redundant....
Whatchoo talkin' 'bout?
He can't handle Pho? I love that shit!
I agree - it is `shit`, and no, I don`t put shit in my mouth.
(OK, OK - it isn`t all that bad. If it were the last food on earth, I would eat it to survive - maybe.)
matsuki wrote:Do you not like cilantro? Or is it the gyuu entrails that turns you off?
Wage Slave wrote:It, or at least coriander, is roundly hated here by the missus. I quite like it myself.
Samurai_Jerk wrote:Some genetically inferior untermenschen can't handle cilantro.
Coligny wrote:Samurai_Jerk wrote:Some genetically inferior untermenschen can't handle cilantro.
You sure ? Your link does not make any mention of jews or niggers...
/spastic
//spastic
///spastic
Samurai_Jerk wrote:I finally found a use for Trump's presidential bid. Recently a few of my Japanese friends have said they really hope we don't elect Trump. I replied he's pretty much like Ishihara. That's the first time I've been able to get Tokyoites to understand what a fuckwad Blinky is/was.
one of the people said the Japanese bid was viewed as having “considerable risk,” given Japanese inexperience building naval equipment overseas.
“The Japanese government and businesses are not used to working together to win such contracts. That is probably a reason for their loss in the latest bidding,” he said.
Takechanpoo wrote:blatantly-flattering-china aussie government booted japan out of deal.one of the people said the Japanese bid was viewed as having “considerable risk,” given Japanese inexperience building naval equipment overseas.
“The Japanese government and businesses are not used to working together to win such contracts. That is probably a reason for their loss in the latest bidding,” he said.
http://www.wsj.com/articles/japan-falls ... re-comment
aside from Mitsubishi and j-gov, most of j-netizens dont believe aussie gov's sit-on-the-fenceare policy and are welcoming for japan to get rejected out of the deal.
Yokohammer wrote:Confirmed: France's DCNS has won the bid to build Australia's new subs.
wuchan wrote:If Abe were really serious about making Japan a global power again he would give the regulatory agencies some teeth and then ban that second pension shit so the old cunts won't have incentive to favor the companies over the citizens. National branding doesn't only apply to tourism, it really matters in business these days and lately Japan' business reputation has been worse than China.
wuchan wrote:
Considerable risk.... Like, you know, putting little bombs in front of your face and calling them "safe"
or "misplacing" $4billion
or straight up lying about your numbers
or stealing Zaha's design and then demanding she gives up all rights
or well, Japan.
Matthew
6 days ago
@Diane @Darren The crew sizes are apples and oranges. German submarines largely have smaller crew's because the nations that use them generally do far less with them and operate in a more confined area of the world.
Australia operates in an area of the world that has us watching 20% of the worlds oceans, We travel further and longer then any one else outside of a nuclear submarine. The result is we need multiple crew's to perform a greater range of tasks meaning larger total crew's, No matter which submarine we choose we will still end up with a crew of no less then 50, more likely above 60.
Takechanpoo wrote:firstly acquire the basic of thinking before posing to know everything.
Tsuru wrote:Fuck the commie Chinese. Get them from Japan, with reactors. And let them build a few more for their own navy, too. And fit those E-767's at Hamamatsu with aerial refueling as well.
It's the 1990s Taiwan sub purchase all over again. So sick of the Chicoms trying to nose into other peoples defence purchasing affairs. If they want to play with the big boys it's about time they grew up and stop being crybabies whenever other people in the region want an insurance policy.
matsuki wrote:Takechanpoo wrote:firstly acquire the basic of thinking before posing to know everything.
If this was a song, I'd be blasting it here....errrrrday!
The French "Barracuda" crew stat says 60 + 20 special forces. the German "Type 216" crew stat says 60 +16 special forces....so your point is the smaller Japanese subs in the bid were too small?
Grumpy Gramps wrote:Question of storage space maybe. Where the French would have a wine cellar, the Aussies can store their six packs. Germans would only have space for sauerkraut; goes a long way for them but then, maybe it's not for everyone
Takechanpoo wrote:barracuda-class is originally designed to nuclear powered. the body is too big for diesel. if they build it with diesel engine, the cruising speed will be like a turtle walking on land. its equal to an underwater coffin. or they will convert it to nuke powered in the future as i said above?
Russell wrote:Tsuru wrote:Fuck the commie Chinese. Get them from Japan, with reactors. And let them build a few more for their own navy, too. And fit those E-767's at Hamamatsu with aerial refueling as well.
It's the 1990s Taiwan sub purchase all over again. So sick of the Chicoms trying to nose into other peoples defence purchasing affairs. If they want to play with the big boys it's about time they grew up and stop being crybabies whenever other people in the region want an insurance policy.
Wasn't that the 1980s?
For the non-Dutch among us, this refers to the immense pressure from China on the Netherlands to not sell subs to Taiwan. In the end the Dutch gave in. Unfortunately.
kurogane wrote:I think it's nice that those submerged memories have surfaced.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 109 guests