Hot Topics | |
---|---|
Takechanpoo wrote:122 Korean women who insist they were comfort women for American soldiers after Korean war to sue K-government for compensation.
http://news.tbs.co.jp/newseye/tbs_newseye2234101.html
see, this day finally came.
how do you Americans deny it? eh?
time to understand Korean are born blackmailers.
Russell wrote:Takechanpoo wrote:122 Korean women who insist they were comfort women for American soldiers after Korean war to sue K-government for compensation.
http://news.tbs.co.jp/newseye/tbs_newseye2234101.html
see, this day finally came.
how do you Americans deny it? eh?
time to understand Korean are born blackmailers.
Problem is, I do not see it mentioned anywhere in the international media...
the United States Army Military Government outlawed prostitution in South Korea.
Wage Slave wrote:And once more Mr T fails to understand the meaning of a text. Even in Japanese, never mind in English. These women are NOT claiming compensation from the US Government for the simple reason the US Government had nothing to do with setting up these brothels. They are claiming from the KOREAN Government because that is who did set them up.
Now, if true, it is reprehensible of course but doesn't bear comparison with what the Imperial Japanese Army got up to. A whole different level of wrong - and that should be so obvious as to negate the need any further explication.
Mr T, you managed to get the wrong end of a completely different stick yet again. Just like your supposedly classified document that proved comfort women were volunteers, well paid and even enjoyed complete freedom to choose their clients. It is very boring - Please try to think a bit more deeply before you spout your opinions.
And be prepared to defend them when they are rightly challenged instead of running away.
Takechanpoo wrote:"
from this situation its pretty easy to make up a story which they were kidnapped in a organized and planned way.
actually there are curious testimonies in which they were abducted by helicopter or Jeep. its treated as one of evidences that empire japan kidnapped them systematically. but as you do know, empire japan did NOT have that both needless to say. yeah.is.
Coligny wrote:Is it full moon soon ?
Coligny wrote:Takechanpoo wrote:"
from this situation its pretty easy to make up a story which they were kidnapped in a organized and planned way.
actually there are curious testimonies in which they were abducted by helicopter or Jeep. its treated as one of evidences that empire japan kidnapped them systematically. but as you do know, empire japan did NOT have that both needless to say. yeah.is.
Wtf is he talking when aboot where of what ?
Takechanpoo wrote:except samurai jerk, you guys are so naive and still dont understand what comfort women is.
Takechanpoo wrote:except samurai jerk, you guys are so naive and still dont understand what comfort women is.
and ...still no english medias havnt reported...ok good
"dont touch it! dont get involved!"
its how your "justice" is.
The women are seeking 10 million won ($9,850) for being made to serve as “US military comfort women” after the Korean War ended in 1953.
The suit, filed on June 25, stated that the South Korean authorities subjugated the women and forced them to provide sex, violating their human rights.
Moreover, the group said that they had been obliged to go through medical check-ups for sexually transmitted diseases.
The plaintiffs also urged the authorities to issue an official apology, revealing the true historical facts.
The Korean War lasted from 1950 till 1953 and split the country in two. During the war, the US intervened as South Korea’s ally, while China were allies of the North.
Throughout the war, UN and South Korean comfort stations operated on the frontline.
However, even after hostilities had ended, between the 1950s and 1960s, some 60 percent of all South Korean prostitutes worked near US military camps.
In 1960, two lawmakers in the South Korean National Assembly called on the country’s leadership to train a supply of prostitutes for the allied military, to prevent them from spending their money in Japan instead.
The suit, filed on June 25, stated that the South Korean authorities subjugated the women and forced them to provide sex, violating their human rights.
Takechanpoo wrote:Former Korean 'comfort women' for U.S. troops sue own government
http://news.yahoo.com/former-korean-com ... 14461.html
im pretty sure those K-biaches, who are natural born swindlers, will sue US gov in the next stage
im really looking forword to it
The liberal daily offered its more than 7m readers the earliest and most credulous accounts of the man, Seiji Yoshida, and the sadistic mission he would later detail in a memoir, My War Crimes. In doing so, it opened a debate about a sordid episode in Japan’s past – its brutal exploitation of thousands of so-called comfort women during the war – that continues to unsettle Japanese society and poison relations with South Korea.
But now the Asahi is causing another stir, by acknowledging for the first time what researchers have believed for years: that Yoshida’s story was almost certainly made up.
In a four-page “re-examination” of decades of reporting about the comfort women, published over two days last week, the Asahi formally retracted 16 stories it wrote about Yoshida from 1982 to 1997, and acknowledged other, smaller faults in its coverage. “We were unable to see through his fraudulent testimony,” the newspaper said.
“Some Japanese conservatives only focus on the question of whether soldiers or officials directly gathered up women by force, and argue that if they didn’t, Japan bears no responsibility,” he said. “But that’s an ugly excuse, like saying the government isn’t responsible for a nuclear accident because the electric company caused it, or a scandal-hit politician saying: ‘I don’t know anything, my secretary did it’.”
My War Crimes was far from the only evidence that the comfort women system was coercive or that the Japanese state bore responsibility. But it was among the most lurid and extreme, and doubts about its reliability had swirled for years. Yoshiaki Yoshimi, the most prominent of liberal Japanese scholars of the comfort women issue, has called the account “useless” as historical evidence.
Wage Slave wrote:From the same article:My War Crimes was far from the only evidence that the comfort women system was coercive or that the Japanese state bore responsibility. But it was among the most lurid and extreme, and doubts about its reliability had swirled for years. Yoshiaki Yoshimi, the most prominent of liberal Japanese scholars of the comfort women issue, has called the account “useless” as historical evidence.
Because a single account was already known to be fabricated does not mean the entire case has collapsed. Far from it.
Carry on .........Nothing new to see here.
Takechanpoo wrote:Wage Slave wrote:From the same article:My War Crimes was far from the only evidence that the comfort women system was coercive or that the Japanese state bore responsibility. But it was among the most lurid and extreme, and doubts about its reliability had swirled for years. Yoshiaki Yoshimi, the most prominent of liberal Japanese scholars of the comfort women issue, has called the account “useless” as historical evidence.
Because a single account was already known to be fabricated does not mean the entire case has collapsed. Far from it.
Carry on .........Nothing new to see here.
so just go confirm directly the consistency of those fuking tainted comfort dotards testimonies and youll find which side is nasty.
but im sure you gaijin dudes never do it and just read damn those english articles and pretend like "we know all" as always.
Wage Slave wrote:From the same article:My War Crimes was far from the only evidence that the comfort women system was coercive or that the Japanese state bore responsibility. But it was among the most lurid and extreme, and doubts about its reliability had swirled for years. Yoshiaki Yoshimi, the most prominent of liberal Japanese scholars of the comfort women issue, has called the account “useless” as historical evidence.
Because a single account was already known to be fabricated does not mean the entire case has collapsed. Far from it.
Carry on .........Nothing new to see here.
Samurai_Jerk wrote:Wage Slave wrote:From the same article:My War Crimes was far from the only evidence that the comfort women system was coercive or that the Japanese state bore responsibility. But it was among the most lurid and extreme, and doubts about its reliability had swirled for years. Yoshiaki Yoshimi, the most prominent of liberal Japanese scholars of the comfort women issue, has called the account “useless” as historical evidence.
Because a single account was already known to be fabricated does not mean the entire case has collapsed. Far from it.
Carry on .........Nothing new to see here.
He's Japanese. You can't expect him to use logic and solid evidence in an argument.
Wage Slave wrote:Samurai_Jerk wrote:Wage Slave wrote:From the same article:My War Crimes was far from the only evidence that the comfort women system was coercive or that the Japanese state bore responsibility. But it was among the most lurid and extreme, and doubts about its reliability had swirled for years. Yoshiaki Yoshimi, the most prominent of liberal Japanese scholars of the comfort women issue, has called the account “useless” as historical evidence.
Because a single account was already known to be fabricated does not mean the entire case has collapsed. Far from it.
Carry on .........Nothing new to see here.
He's Japanese. You can't expect him to use logic and solid evidence in an argument.
Depressing isn't it? And when confronted with logic and solid evidence? Well, that's what incontinent anger and shouting is for.
Takechanpoo wrote:so just go confirm directly the consistency of those fuking tainted comfort dotards testimonies and youll find which side is nasty
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests