Hot Topics | |
---|---|
cstaylor wrote:Yeah, you're tainted. Protection or not, he did put himself in danger, far more than you or me.
"After 13 months in theater, my morale had kind of sputtered," said Capt. Mark St. Laurent, 36, of Leesburg, Virginia. "Now I'm good for another two months."
But other soldiers grew angry that their departure from the airport was delayed for an hour, while they waited for Air Force One to depart. Finding the door barred, about 50 troops got into a shouting match with the soldier blocking their exit. The streets of Baghdad were too dangerous to delay their departure any longer, they shouted.
"Do you have any idea how many IEDs are on this road?" one soldier shouted, referring to improvised explosive devices or roadside bombs. "I have to get back to my base. I don't want to lose a soldier because the president wants us to sit here."
"It was a pleasant surprise, actually," he said. "They had us waiting so long I started to get (mad). But it's not so often you get to meet a president."
Robato wrote:omae mona
I dont think its fair to quote 1 soldier making that complain and pointing out that out of 300, 50 were upset they couldnt leave for an hour.
250 had raised spirits accourding to that news report you posted.
Robato wrote:I think there are better means for the president to get re-elected other than putting himself at the front lines to eat turkey.
Things like this
http://www.msnbc.com/news/986926.asp
Caustic Saint wrote:Raised spirits can vanish pretty quickly when you realise the person responsible for raising them has also created a situation (the one-hour delay) that can put you in danger.
cstaylor wrote:Yeah, you're tainted. Protection or not, he did put himself in danger, far more than you or me. He could just have easily flown to the base in Qatar or someplace else that's a lot more safe (like Clinton's trip to Macedonia during the war in Kosovo).
devicenull wrote: ..obviously it was done for the press..
He could just have easily flown to the base in Qatar or someplace else that's a lot more safe...
Stars and Stripes, the Pentagon-authorized newspaper of the U.S. military, is bucking for a court-martial.
When last we checked in on Stripes, it was reporting on a survey it did of troops in Iraq, finding that half of those questioned described their units' moral as low and their training as insufficient and said they did not plan to reenlist.
With the Pentagon just recovering from that, Stars and Stripes is blowing the whistle on President Bush's Thanksgiving visit to Baghdad, saying the cheering soldiers who met him were pre-screened and others showing up for a turkey dinner were turned away.
half of those questioned described their units' moral as low and their training as insufficient and said they did not plan to reenlist.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests