The Japanese word here is "kokutai", not identity.
Does Japan lack a sense of self and simply respond to changes from the outside? Advocates of constitutional revision blame the lack of a sense of identity -- within the Japanese state and among the people -- on the postwar Constitution.
How? Any gaijin here read the Japanese constitution? Maybe the right-wing would like to axe these "identity-damaging" sections:
Article 11 [Fundamental Human Rights]
(1) The people shall not be prevented from enjoying any of the fundamental human rights.
(2) These fundamental human rights, guaranteed to the people by this Constitution, shall be conferred upon the people of this and future generations as irrevocable and inviolable rights.
Article 13 [Individual Rights]
(1) All of the people shall be respected as individuals.
(2) Their right to live, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness
shall, to the extent that it does not interfere with the public welfare, be the supreme consideration in legislation and in other governmental affairs.
Article 15 [Electoral Rights]
(1) The people have the inalienable right to choose their public officials and to dismiss them.
(2) All public officials are servants of the whole community and not of any group thereof.
(3) Universal adult suffrage is guaranteed with regard to the election of public officials.
(4) In all elections, secrecy of the ballot shall not be violated.
(5) A voter shall not be answerable, publicly or privately, for the choice he has made.
Article 24 [Matrimonial Equality]
(1) Marriage shall be based only on the mutual consent of both sexes and it shall be maintained through mutual cooperation with the equal rights of husband and wife as a basis.
(2) With regards to choice of spouse, property rights, inheritance, choice of domicile, divorce, and other matters pertaining to marriage and the family, laws shall be enacted from the standpoint of individual dignity and the essential equality of the sexes.