Can anyone list the "factual errors"?

[cstaylor]

Beware the recklessness of Iris Chang and others

Chang's 1997 international bestseller "The Rape of Nanking" has been shown by both Japanese and American historians to be laden with errors, and Furukawa was astonished that the remarks by these activists were nevertheless so full of factual misconceptions

Yet he never lists the errors... if these errors are important, why aren't they listed?

[cstaylor]

First of all, we should distinguish about differences between 'War' & 'massacre'. Recently, some Un-Japanese Historians started to read papers at academic meetings. Don't swallow everything about she wrote & quackery photoes! This is a part of huge political campaign to heighten 'anti-Japanese sentimant'.If you have enough knowlege about Chinese & Japanese culture, you would find the truth easily. Such as phony Japanese uniforms in photoes, porno photoes with false captions, the way of massacre is absolutely Chinese, there were numbers of Chinese guerilla who just looked like civilians and Japanese soldiers shouln'tve fought with them ?, why after 1 month of the'massacre' population increased in Nankin, why we don't find hybrid people,...etc...
Chinese government made up stories of massacre for 'The Tokyo War Crimes Trial'. And Iris Chang wrote this book to take advantage of innocent people. Historically, Japanese have been utilized by Chinese for a long time anyway.

I rest my case. Nutters may be international, but this guy takes the cake for stupidity.