Hot Topics | |
---|---|
aquamarine wrote:wife
American Oyaji wrote:I'd say that Samsung shipped most of the units to the U.S.
It's the only place that Android phones are REALLY selling becaues there is no alternative. I mean, the only carrier at the moment is AT&T and some people simply hate them.
I think DoCoMo should go ahead and sell the Android, but try and get rights to sell the iPhone in the future. It will make Softbank improve their game or die.
FG Lurker wrote: Nokia fans? They must be getting close to being on the endangered species list by now...
I'll probably replace my iPhone 3GS this coming summer. I'm through with those fuckers at Softbank too. I hate NTT but not enough to put up with a company (Softbank) that doesn't fucking work half the time and has shitty performance when it does work.
Anyway, I am looking forward to Android 3.0 and seeing how much the interface improves. Google hired Matias Duarte earlier this year and 3.0 is probably where we will see what impact he is going to have on Android.
Android 3.0, a dual core Cortex-A9 CPU, and a gig or so of memory? Sign me up!
waruta wrote:DoCoMo can sell the iPhone anytime, they just didn't want all the restrictions nor were the projected earnings enough to cover all the infrastructure upgrades that a couple million pake-hodai users were going to use....
waruta wrote:Android 3.0 and a dual-core Hummingbird CPU, SD Memory expandable and for me the most important: a battery life of more than 6 hours.
American Oyaji wrote:As far as battery life goes, I can go 2 days without recharging my iPhone 3GS and that's with normal phone and data usage.
FG Lurker wrote:Everyone's definition of normal is different. I can barely scrape through a day on my 3GS without needing to recharge. I usually just leave it plugged in when I'm at my desk so I don't need to worry about it when I am out. I don't use the phone that much but I do have several email accounts set up on it that use Exchange-style push for data transfer. Better battery life would be a plus for sure.
waruta wrote:I agree with hatred of AT&T they can go suck my left nut.
FG Lurker wrote:Whoa... Totally off topic, but when did you get married?
aquamarine wrote:A month ago after a 6 year relationship.
FG Lurker wrote:I'm very happy to have kept my 3GS as I have no doubt that whatever is available next summer will be a massive jump over the iPhone 4.
FG Lurker wrote:I certainly appreciate what Apple has done for the smartphone market but Android is going to crush the iPhone.
canman wrote:It really pisses me off, how anti-Korean many Japanese people are. I was talking to a group of my adult students about getting a new Galaxy phone, and they immediately poo pooed the idea. And why, because it is made by Samsung. Now I will grant you that Korean makers stuff was a little but shoddy at times, but then again so was Japanese stuff back in the day.
But if I'm not mistaken Samsung has now overtaken its Japanese rivals and sells more flat panel televisions in the world, so obviously they are doing something good. But you would never know here in Japan. Apple Iphones are great, because it is American(made in China, Taiwan and Korea).
Anyway rant off, but it still bugs me.
IparryU wrote:i rather buy samsung than sony, some other jap. brand, or apple for that matter.
never had any problems with any samsung product i owned and hell only starts from sony... if you have ever had a sony desktop/laptop you would know.
canman wrote:It really pisses me off, how anti-Korean many Japanese people are.
FG Lurker wrote:In fairness it does work both ways. You won't find a country as full of anti-Japanese people as Korea. In Seoul it's surprising how few Japanese cars you see and in general there really isn't much stuff from Japanese companies sold in Korea.
FG Lurker wrote:Personally I bought Kumho tires for the car earlier this year. 60,000yen for four when it would have cost me 120,000 for equivalent quality Bridgestone and even more for Yokohama.
Coligny wrote:Can you tell us a little more aboot this ?
FG Lurker wrote:Personally I bought Kumho tires for the car earlier this year. 60,000yen for four when it would have cost me 120,000 for equivalent quality Bridgestone and even more for Yokohama. They're definitely better than the Bridgestones that came off the car but maybe not quite as good as top-level Yokohamas would be. For the price though, unbeatable.
Sarutaro wrote:I got a set of Kumho's for my Volvo V70 from Autobacs for only 27,000 yen last year (including balancing). Cheap!
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests