Hot Topics | |
---|---|
MacArthur had what is now an affected, unappealing manner of speech. Add to that Tommy Lee Jones is not known for doing accents* and the "Boss" may not get his coffee.Screwed-down Hairdo wrote: I wonder if TLJ has ever heard MacArthur speak? Seems like he doesn't even attempt to mimic him...
Coligny wrote:TLJ is way to old to play Mc Arthur circa 1945...
(Speaking of TLJ... MIB3 was really not so bad...)
Screwed-down Hairdo wrote:...a religious zealot
Screwed-down Hairdo wrote:borderline fascist
Screwed-down Hairdo wrote:far-right wing Merkin
Screwed-down Hairdo wrote:I guess I can relate to the enormously inflated ego (meglomania???)
Screwed-down Hairdo wrote:and cowardice.
Coligny wrote:As for MacArthur... i can't share the lve since i discoverd the character throught his korean madness (he's the guy who wanted to dig trench and fill them with radioactive sludge to prevent enemy troops form coming in right ?)
cstaylor wrote:Coligny wrote:As for MacArthur... i can't share the love since i discoverd the character throught his korean madness (he's the guy who wanted to dig trench and fill them with radioactive sludge to prevent enemy troops form coming in right ?)
I think you should stick to posts about cats and recent Soviet history.
cstaylor wrote:If you'd like supporting evidence, ask Taro to lend you the book I sent him about MacArthur when he was in the hospital.
The man was many things, but if I had to pick a single term to describe him, it'd be "K.Y.". When he proposed nuking the Yalu River, he was channelling Luce from Life magazine.
The most accurate criticism of MacArthur comes from Eisenhower. Truman's complaints were garbage.
Yokohammer wrote:John Dower describes MacArthur as being a bit out of touch in "Embracing Defeat."
Coligny wrote:(even though I didn't spend much time there... I was an -extremly mediocre- history student at uni...)
Screwed-down Hairdo wrote:You want me to read a goddamned book???cstaylor wrote:If you'd like supporting evidence, ask Taro to lend you the book I sent him about MacArthur when he was in the hospital.But I love alternate, revisionist history (I've lived in Japan for decades, remember...), so I look forward to it.
cstaylor wrote:Coligny wrote:(even though I didn't spend much time there... I was an -extremly mediocre- history student at uni...)
Compared to the hard sciences, history is really a matter of taste; like philosophy, but without the rigorous logic. I don't enjoy television, so I read historical biographies.
cstaylor wrote:Screwed-down Hairdo wrote:You want me to read a goddamned book???cstaylor wrote:If you'd like supporting evidence, ask Taro to lend you the book I sent him about MacArthur when he was in the hospital.But I love alternate, revisionist history (I've lived in Japan for decades, remember...), so I look forward to it.
Didn't realize Manchester counted as revisionist history.
Yokohammer wrote:John Dower describes MacArthur as being a bit out of touch in "Embracing Defeat."
Embracing Defeat is a brilliant book, by the way. Essential reading for anyone who's actually trying to figure out what the phuque makes these people tick.
Did I mention that Embracing Defeat is a brilliant book? It's brilliant. Read it.
Coligny wrote:I've always seen history not as something teaching you aboot the past.
But the way past event are sold as history tells usually quite a lot aboot today's bias, porpraganda, manipulashiuns and overall stupidity...
cstaylor wrote:Coligny wrote:I've always seen history not as something teaching you aboot the past.
But the way past event are sold as history tells usually quite a lot aboot today's bias, porpraganda, manipulashiuns and overall stupidity...
Most of the hard sciences have the same criteria. Remember all of the baloney about "junk" DNA? Oops, looks like they were wrong. Getting all of your history from a single viewpoint has the same outcome.
Coligny wrote:Physics, chemistry and above all math... that would be all...
Coligny wrote:The cuban missile crisis is not much history... usual military information classification policy is around 50 years... So we'd be 2 years away from even knowing if we got all the information...
Coligny wrote:For me, history stop more or less with the end of the victorian era (and I'm being generous). And most of mah historian friends don't touch anything newer than the Byzantine empires (since it's their field of research anyway...)...
cstaylor wrote:History up until the 20th century is a series of accidents amid poor sanitation. At least in these wonderfully modern times we've got the sanitation problem mostly licked.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests