Hot Topics | |
---|---|
BO-SENSEI wrote:Atleast Japan has a system for young kids to play rugby, it only exists as a college sport in most places in America.
Mock Cockpit wrote:Rugby doesn't have a large base in Japan. On Shikoku the number of elementary school age kids involved in rugby is around 200. Total. A suburb of Auckland would have more juniors than that.
Ketou wrote:Baseball just isn't a world sport. Cricket has a more countries that play.
Ketou wrote:I doubt there is a system at all....imagine playing rugby on those nice sandy school ovals....ouch
wuchan wrote:you haven't been here long. Japanese play "touch rugby", so much gayer than the real thing: I grab.
xenomorph42 wrote:Your joking right??? You call Cricket a sport good God...yea, I admit Baseball is boring, but Cricket...jeez! Watching the grass grow or watching "Rhythmic Gymnastics" is bit more entertaining, seriously!
Charles wrote:[SIZE="5"]Yes![/SIZE]
And here is my list:
Synchronized swimming
Synchronized diving
Synchronized anything
BMX
Mountain Biking
Equestrian (alternately, we could award medals to the horses rather than the riders, or just ban all humans from riding and let the horses do their thing by themselves).
Kayak & Canoe
Trampoline
Rhythmic Gymnastics
Badminton
Ping Pong
Water Polo
And while we're at it, time to fix the Winter Games too. Eliminate:
Snowboarding
Curling
Freestyle skiing
All of these "sports" are ridiculous, and should join the list of discontinued Olympic events like tug-of-war, live pigeon shooting, indian club swinging and croquet. Actually, I'd rather watch a tug of war or croquet than any of those current events.
Oh and one more thing to eliminate, in order to return to the original Olympic ideal: clothing. All athletes should compete as the original Greeks did, nude, wearing nothing but a coat of olive oil.
xenomorph42 wrote:Your joking right??? You call Cricket a sport good God...yea, I admit Baseball is boring, but Cricket...jeez! Watching the grass grow or watching "Rhythmic Gymnastics" is bit more entertaining, seriously!
Ketou wrote:Not quite sure where in my comment I mention my opinion of either sport. I merely said that cricket would be more a 'world' sport than baseball.
Cricket test matches are quite long and tedious, 5 days often ending in a draw. The 20 over one day matches I would prefer to watch over baseball though.
IkemenTommy wrote:Rhythmic Gymnastics? Mind as well bring in Synchronized Masturbation. It has an artistic element, vigor, and finesse. They should have both the loooong program and the free routine.
While we are on the same topic, they should throw in darts and bowling. Normal bowling is boring, so you have to be drunk before playing. Doping is allowed.. hell, it's mandatory. Call the events "Drunken darts" and "Slosh bowling."
And of course, this guy summed up everything in one package:
xenomorph42 wrote:I highly doubt that. I hate Baseball, but at least it's a fairly simple game, but who in their right mind would watch that lame-ass sport, really? Not the whole world. That is your opinion, because if it were true, why wasn't the sport chosen?
As you said, the test matches are long and seriously, painfully tedious and over 5 days????
Good God, if anyone really enjoys serious competitive sports, you cannot put Cricket in that category. Basketball, yes! Cricket, hell naw!!!!
Ketou wrote:I'm talking about the breadth of nations that play the game compared to baseball. You are off on a totally different topic.
Greji wrote:There are quite a few countries that play baseball not only in North and South America, but also in Asia and Europe. Whether we as individuals might like, or dislike the game is not relevant. It is the amount of participation. Take a look at the countries represented in the MLB.
Ketou wrote:I'm talking about the breadth of nations that play the game compared to baseball. You are off on a totally different topic.
Cricket did appear at the Olympics once and like baseball was dropped.
As for my opinion, I find watching sport, any sport, extremely boring. I can play and enjoy playing sport but have no knowledge of teams and players in vogue. If I was given the choice of having to watch either Baseball, Basketball or Cricket, I would choice Cricket. It's a personal and I suppose cultural thing, neither right or wrong however you think.
Mulboyne wrote:The registered player base in Japan is 120,000 and there are nearly 5,000 accredited referees. Granted, the number of good players is tiny and the number of competent referees probably smaller still but there is a wide base even if it's paper thin. The High School Rugby tournament was first held in 1917. Kids may not start early but a lot of them do get some exposure. It's not going to compare with the exposure a New Zealand child gets because it's the national sport there. There are plenty of parts of England, Scotland and Ireland where you can go through school without touching a rugby ball.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest