Hot Topics | |
---|---|
chibaka wrote:Thanks for the reply, all insurance to date has been Japanese company plans, so I wouldn't think there would be any back claims.
Haven't considered the foreign insurance plans, I imagine lots of tooth sucking should I present that card when seeking treatment, especially living in the inaka... still get stared at for the crime of wearing a different face here, being double the average size doesn't help.
As a Brit, I'll never criticize the NHS again
chibaka wrote:
Question about the shitty office health insurance. When I came here first I had company insurance, then when cirkumstances changed I joined my wife's company plan....
Anyway, after more than a few conversations and a few claims... I want to think about the Japanese system, so is there a rough guide on how much it will hurt my wallet?
Russell wrote:Whether it is a merit to be in the national system depends also on your health. One member here (Taro Toporific) is said to stay in Japan because he cannot afford to join the US health insurance. If you are healthy, it may not be so economic to join. I guess it also depends on how long you plan to stay here in Japan.
Taro Toporific wrote:chibaka wrote:
Question about the shitty office health insurance. When I came here first I had company insurance, then when cirkumstances changed I joined my wife's company plan....
Anyway, after more than a few conversations and a few claims... I want to think about the Japanese system, so is there a rough guide on how much it will hurt my wallet?
Gomi-Girl uses/used foreign health insurance and she seems to have saved a lot of money.
Yep, I have lived in health insurance exile since 1980.![]()
As paraplegic in the USA I was denied almost all claims under the "prexisting conditions" loophole, and my monthly premium was well over $1,800/m (178,551 yen per month!). In comparison for me, Japanese health insurance is almost free and because I am handicapped there's no deductible---I walk out of the doctors and the pharmacists without having to pay one yen.
wangta wrote:Before anybody slags me off for not wanting to pay the pension, I should point out that when I was in Japan the first time I was told I had a choice and so didn't pay it.
Can anybody tell me what is the likelihood of City Hall telling me to come in and sign up for both? I had to go there with my boss first time back but fortunately I had left my passport behind and they said come back another day.
Samurai_Jerk wrote:
Who ever told you that you didn't have to join was either mistaken or lying. It's compulsory. A lot of employers, especially in the eikaiwa industry, do (or at least used to) lie about that because they don't want to pay their half which they're legally required to do.
There is strong likelihood you'll get something in the mail someday telling you you need to sign up. If you don't, they could go after your bank account though I don't think that happens very often. There was also some talk about making it a requirement to be enrolled for visa renewals and status changes.
As paraplegic in the USA I was denied almost all claims under the "prexisting conditions" loophole,
canman wrote:Chibaka, how long have you been in Japan will decide how much you have to,pay in back payments.
wangta wrote:I still think the lack of some kind of refund or discounted payments for those who never use the system
wangta wrote:Sorry, I didn't make it clear who told me - it was my first city hall. Honest. I was in Japan first time around quite some time ago when nenkin was not attached to the national health insurance with no exceptions. I was given the choice to join or not join the pension system and I didn't.
I still think the lack of some kind of refund or discounted payments for those who never use the system but pay a monthly payment of around 25,000 yen over a number of yrs is not the way to do things.
chibaka wrote:So let me get this straight, hypothetical situation:
Salaryman joins a company and with it gets an insurance card, covers all health (minus of course the 30%). Salaryman after 20 years for whatever reason leaves the company and is unemployed. He tries to join the national scheme and is asked to pay back twenty years?
Samurai_Jerk wrote:chibaka wrote: You haven't been very clear about which you're on.
chibaka wrote:Right, well the first card is long gone, and my memory cells are fading. However the card I have now, which is identical to my wifes (I think, she's not here at the mo) has my name, date of birth, and her company name as they issued it. Never get questioned when I present it anywhere.
Still can't see that she or I would be liable for backpayment, should we ever join the national plan, but then sometimes I have to remind myself where I live, and that normal logic just doesn't cut it
Samurai_Jerk wrote:
If you have a plastic card that's been issued by the company that you just present at the hospital every time you go and are automatically covered and only have to pay the 30% difference, you're are in the system.
canman wrote:
I think where it might get murky, is that if you decide to get a job.
Samurai_Jerk wrote:wangta wrote:Sorry, I didn't make it clear who told me - it was my first city hall. Honest. I was in Japan first time around quite some time ago when nenkin was not attached to the national health insurance with no exceptions. I was given the choice to join or not join the pension system and I didn't.
Regardless of who told, they were wrong. A lot of the city offices in the past didn't know the rules themselves and told people it was optional or even refused to let them join. However, the central government doesn't care about that.I still think the lack of some kind of refund or discounted payments for those who never use the system but pay a monthly payment of around 25,000 yen over a number of yrs is not the way to do things.
wangta wrote:Samurai_Jerk wrote:wangta wrote:Sorry, I didn't make it clear who told me - it was my first city hall. Honest. I was in Japan first time around quite some time ago when nenkin was not attached to the national health insurance with no exceptions. I was given the choice to join or not join the pension system and I didn't.
Regardless of who told, they were wrong. A lot of the city offices in the past didn't know the rules themselves and told people it was optional or even refused to let them join. However, the central government doesn't care about that.I still think the lack of some kind of refund or discounted payments for those who never use the system but pay a monthly payment of around 25,000 yen over a number of yrs is not the way to do things.
I'm not trying to be smart with you - the evidence points to now gaijin are being sucked into the Govt's embracing of retrospective payments and penalties for actions that up to about 2005 or so were fine. I know you've been here for a fairly lengthy time but I can tell you that the pension part of kokuminkenkohoken was voluntary in many prefectures in the year 2,000 and for some time until relatively recently.
Yes, it may have been a case of a rule not being enforced but the fact is, in different prefectures many ward offices gave the gaijin the option of joining or not. I am sure that was because shakai hoken was different - the employer paid half. It was seen by my old city hall as the gaijin's choice because we were not getting any subsidy from their employer even though we were working full time as Engrish teachers. Ward offices knew the game of underplaying the the teachers' hours was going on with kokuminkenkohoken.
The foreigners MUST pay the pension rule has been presented as the only option Japan wide over the last few years. I have friends who left Japan 5 yrs ago and they were in the same boat - they were given the option to join or not some years before and when they checked with their ward offices again it was the same answer, no, on kokuminkenkohoken you have a choice. Shakai hoken you don"t as you are getting subsidised by your employer.
The numbers of Japanese refusing to join or pay into the system andof course the fact that the J govt like every other govt in the world has wasted untold billions on crap and perks for politicians and their cronies/interest groups is why we are now being forced to pay. The retrospectivity is not a previous practice re gaijin generally - only with the health insurance did you have to do the back pay if you stopped paying.
As for the idea that if you NEVER use your health coverage in 5 plus years after paying a total of around 300,000 yen per year for 5 yrs and it's laughable to ask for a certain level of discount or whatever - that's the way some private funds operate in a no. of countries and it's not laughable.
Your premiums go down just as they would in reverse go up if you are a smoker or have some pre existing conditions. Or you receive some special service for free or at a discounted price. In Korea my national health contributions stayed at the same level over some years because like in Japan, I never once used the system.
wangta wrote:The point of my relating the background to ward offices allowing gaijins in the past not to pay the pension component of the kokuminkenkohoken is that it was not even a solid rule until relatively recently. It was at the discretion of different ward offices in different prefectures - the whole retrospectivity now is simply a cash cow. Yes, we have to pay it now by what is being enforced at this present time and has been for the last few years at least.
Oh please, the old 'If you don't like it, go home, don't live here'............... I know I am a new poster but I've been a lurker for a while and I don't recall people telling you that when you gripe about something which you and everybody inevitably does at some time on a forum.
And you missed the point - irrespective of whether Japan does it or not, some other countries do have health insurance that acknowledges you when you don't use the system and gives you something back whether it be premiums that are reduced for the next year or stay the same even while those who use the system's regularly are rising. Pointing this out to you to let you know the idea is not laughable as you indicated is hardly equivalent to 'I shouldn't live in Japan'.
Samurai_Jerk wrote:
I don't mind people bitching. I do mind people avoiding their legal obligation to pay taxes, social security, or NHI which you seem to want to do.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest