Hot Topics | |
---|---|
IparryU wrote:Going to blow a bunch of money but not pay people out...
Gotta love bailouts.
Tokyo Electric Power Co. says it has placed tons of ice blocks in underground trenches at the Fukushima No. 1 complex in an attempt to freeze highly toxic water pooled there, a necessary step before a 1.5-km ice wall can be constructed to keep groundwater out.
[...]
In April, Tepco inserted refrigeration rods in the trenches to try to freeze the water but abandoned the effort after more than three frustrating months.
According to the company, some 11,000 tons of highly toxic water has flowed into the trenches through the No. 2 and No. 3 reactor buildings.
As an additional measure, Tepco started putting 15 tons of ice per day into the trenches late last month. Though there is now 58 tons of ice in the trenches, the utility has “yet to see” whether it will work, a Tepco official said Monday.
The new method was introduced after an increasingly alarmed Nuclear Regulation Authority urged the company last month to take additional steps as soon as possible to handle the radioactive water.
The official said the company will also consider putting blocks of dry ice in the trenches to help freeze the water.
More
Like many of her neighbors, Satomi Inokoshi worries that her gritty hometown is being spoiled by the newcomers and the money that have rolled into Iwaki since the Fukushima nuclear disaster almost 3½ years ago.
“Iwaki is changing — and not for the good,” said Inokoshi, 55, who echoes a sentiment widely heard in this town of almost 300,000 where the economic boom that followed the worst nuclear accident since Chernobyl has brought its own disruption.
Property prices in Iwaki, about 60 km (35 miles) south of the wrecked nuclear plant, have jumped as evacuees forced from homes in more heavily contaminated areas snatch up apartments and land. Hundreds of workers, who have arrived to work in the nuclear clean-up, crowd downtown hotels.
But longtime residents have also come to resent evacuees and the government compensation that has made the newcomers relatively rich in a blue-collar town built on coal mining and access to a nearby port. Locals have stopped coming to the entertainment district where Inokoshi runs a bar, she says, scared off by the nuclear workers and their rowdy reputation.
“The situation around Iwaki is unsettled and unruly,” said Ryosuke Takaki, a professor of sociology at Iwaki Meisei University, who has studied the town’s developing divide. “There are many people who have evacuated to Iwaki, and there are all kinds of incidents caused by friction.”
Residents across Fukushima Prefecture hailed the first wave of workers who arrived to contain the nuclear disaster in 2011 as heroes. Cities like Iwaki also welcomed evacuees from towns closer to the meltdowns and explosions. At the time, Japan’s stoicism and sense of community were praised around the world for helping those who survived an earthquake and tsunami that killed nearly 19,000 and triggered explosions at the nuclear plant.
But that solidarity and sense of shared purpose has frayed, according to dozens of interviews. Many Iwaki residents say they have grown weary of hosting evacuees in temporary housing.
And the newcomers themselves are frightened, says Hideo Hasegawa, who heads a nonprofit group looking after evacuees at the largest temporary housing complex in Iwaki.
“When they move in to an apartment, they don’t talk to neighbors and hide,” said Hasegawa, who works from a small office located between rows of gray, prefabricated shacks housing the evacuees. “You hear this hate talk everywhere you go: restaurants, shops, bars. It’s relentless.”
The 2011 nuclear crisis forced more than 160,000 people in Fukushima Prefecture to evacuate and leave their homes. Half of them are still not allowed to return to the most badly contaminated townships within 20 km (12 miles) of the destroyed plant known as the exclusion zone.
Since April, the government has allowed some residents to return to parts of the evacuation zone. But the area remains sparsely populated and riddled with hot spots where radiation is as much as four times the government’s target for public safety. Work crews in white decontamination suits have poured radiation-tainted topsoil and debris into black plastic bags piled at improvised storage sites on roadsides and public parks awaiting a shift to a more permanent nuclear waste dump.
By contrast, Iwaki has prospered. On a recent Saturday, parking lots near downtown were packed — along with restaurants near Taira, the city’s downtown. Chuo-dai Kashima, a newly developed area in Iwaki where many of the temporary housing units have been built, saw an almost 12 percent rise in land prices in the past year, according to government data. That was among the highest increases across the nation and behind only Ishinomaki, Miyagi Prefecture, a coastal city that was destroyed by the 2011 tsunami and has only just begun to rebuild.
At the heart of the tensions is an unresolved debate about how much people across Fukushima should be compensated for the suffering, dislocation and uncertainty that followed the nuclear accident.
Some Iwaki residents grumble they are being forced to shoulder the burden of hosting evacuees who receive far more compensation from the government and do not have to pay rent on their government-provided prefab temporary homes.
In January 2013, vandals threw paint and broke windows on cars parked in evacuee housing at multiple locations. Less than a month earlier, someone had painted graffiti reading, “Evacuees Go Home” at the entrance to a city office.
Tokyo Electric Power Co., the operator of the Fukushima plant, has paid almost $41 billion in compensation as a result of the nuclear accident. Payments vary depending on the amount of radiation recorded in a particular area, a system that evacuees have complained appears arbitrary. A family of four in one part of an evacuated town might receive $1 million, while a similar family in a less contaminated part of the same evacuated town would get just over half of that amount, according to trade ministry data.
The radioactive plume that erupted after the triple meltdown at the Fukushima plant traveled northwest, missing Iwaki. Most of the city’s residents evacuated for a while, but most then returned. Their compensation was also limited: the majority received about ¥120,000 ($1,200) each.
Many established residents in Iwaki complain government payouts to the newcomers have been frittered away on luxury cars and villas, locally dubbed “disaster relief mansions.”
“The food the evacuees eat and the clothes they wear are different,” said Hiroshi Watahiki, 56, a chiropractor in Iwaki. “They can afford it from their compensation funds. They have time and money to go gambling since they’re not working.”
More
Russell wrote:Looks like a social disaster waiting to happen.
Russell wrote:What if they gamble away all their compensation money?
The Sendai District Court on Tuesday ordered a driving school in Miyagi Prefecture to pay ¥1.9 billion in damages to relatives of 25 students and a part-time employee who died in the March 11, 2011, earthquake and tsunami disaster.
wagyl wrote:I don't know anything about the details in this particular case but you find that many of these "why are they seeking to make that little place take responsibility" situations are insurance related. Yes, the court case is in the name of the driving school, but it may be that the driving school had insurance to cover such an event, which is why a claim is being pursued. One of the first things a lawyer should check is whether the party you want to sue has funds available, because there is no victory in getting a ruling against someone with no money. You can't get blood from a stone.
JT is currently down for me, but if you got that picture from the JT site, then their "Joban" failure is more than just poor cultural knowledge: the name is written right there in the photo, on the car.
Coligny wrote:They don't have concepts like legal precedent in japan where one court decision can be used to rule in on other cases ?
Coligny wrote:They don't have concepts like legal precedent in japan where one court decision can be used to rule in on other cases ?
The Sendai District Court on Tuesday ordered a driving school in Yamamoto, Miyagi Prefecture, to pay ¥1.91 billion in compensation to the bereaved families of an employee and 25 students at the school who died in the March 11, 2011, tsunami, citing the school’s breach of its obligation to ensure safety.
Presiding Judge Kenji Takamiya said the Joban Yamamoto driving school could have predicted the arrival of tsunami as some instructors at the school had heard the evacuation warning.
Among lawsuits filed against operators of facilities where many people died in tsunami, which was triggered by the Great East Japan Earthquake, the suit filed against the Joban Yamamoto driving school was the second in which a court acknowledged a legal responsibility of an operator, according to a lawyer for the plaintiffs.
In September 2013, the court ordered Hiyori Kindergarten in Ishinomaki in the prefecture and its former principal to pay ¥177 million in compensation to the bereaved families of four children killed by tsunami. The kindergarten and plaintiffs later reached a court-mediated settlement at the Sendai High Court.
The lawsuit against the Joban Yamamoto driving school was filed by the bereaved families of 25 students aged 18 and 19 and a female employee, then 27. The plaintiffs demanded the school pay ¥1.97 billion in damages.
According to the suit, 23 students were told by the school’s instructors and other staff to stay at the school after the earthquake hit on March 11, 2011. About an hour later, they were heading home in four of the school’s buses when they were engulfed by tsunami at about 3:50 p.m. near the school.
When the earthquake hit, two other students were taking a driving lesson, and their instructors then drove them back to the school. The two were swept away by tsunami while they were walking home. The female employee stayed at the school.
The plaintiffs had insisted the school could have predicted the arrival of tsunami because of the strong shaking of the earthquake, the announcement by fire stations and others that a major tsunami warning had been issued, as well as media reports. They had asserted that the school committed a breach of obligation to ensure safety, saying it “unthinkingly had the students stay” at the school.
The school, meanwhile, insisted it was not in a position to have students evacuate from tsunami because lessons ended or were suspended. The school also said the female employee could have evacuated on her own.
In the ruling, Takamiya said, “It can be presumed that some instructors heard a fire truck from a fire station, which was running in front of the school, calling for everyone to evacuate to a nearby middle school.
“The school was obliged to have the students and others evacuate by not ignoring this,” the ruling said.
More
Russell wrote: There is no obligation to obey the driving school's teachers under all circumstances...
Russell wrote:So, the point seems to be that there were clear warnings from the fire station to evacuate, and this was ignored for one hour. That does not seem OK to me.
One has to wonder, though, whether those students couldn't think of their own. There is no obligation to obey the driving school's teachers under all circumstances...
Coligny wrote:Russell wrote: There is no obligation to obey the driving school's teachers under all circumstances...
When you are not behind a steering wheel in a car having the karimen sticker, their authority is pretty much on par with that hobo down the river gluing the head of dead crows to broken plastic dolls.
...anyway... For disasters, in normal countries the usual chain of command in the field run like firemen->EMT->police
And when proper command post is setup you got the head of the civilian protection as top authority.
Soooo basically, if a guy in a red firetruck tell you to gtfo... You do...
^^^impressive to be i a country where this kind of shit have to be stated clearly...
Samurai_Jerk wrote:Coligny wrote:Russell wrote: There is no obligation to obey the driving school's teachers under all circumstances...
When you are not behind a steering wheel in a car having the karimen sticker, their authority is pretty much on par with that hobo down the river gluing the head of dead crows to broken plastic dolls.
...anyway... For disasters, in normal countries the usual chain of command in the field run like firemen->EMT->police
And when proper command post is setup you got the head of the civilian protection as top authority.
Soooo basically, if a guy in a red firetruck tell you to gtfo... You do...
^^^impressive to be i a country where this kind of shit have to be stated clearly...
It kind of reminds me of a case in 1999 or 2000 where a family was camping on the bank of a river in Yamanashi-ken - if I remember correctly - and it suddenly starting raining buckets. They had pitched their tents near a small dam and as the water levels rose it became apparent that the damn would have to be opened which would flood the bank where they were camping. Authorities came by several times and told them to move because the area was going to flood and alarms were sounded but they ignored the warnings. Eventually the whole family including their small children ended up drowning. The reason I remember this story is I had hiked through that exact spot the day before.
Samurai_Jerk wrote:Coligny wrote:Russell wrote: There is no obligation to obey the driving school's teachers under all circumstances...
When you are not behind a steering wheel in a car having the karimen sticker, their authority is pretty much on par with that hobo down the river gluing the head of dead crows to broken plastic dolls.
...anyway... For disasters, in normal countries the usual chain of command in the field run like firemen->EMT->police
And when proper command post is setup you got the head of the civilian protection as top authority.
Soooo basically, if a guy in a red firetruck tell you to gtfo... You do...
^^^impressive to be i a country where this kind of shit have to be stated clearly...
It kind of reminds me of a case in 1999 or 2000 where a family was camping on the bank of a river in Yamanashi-ken - if I remember correctly - and it suddenly starting raining buckets. They had pitched their tents near a small dam and as the water levels rose it became apparent that the damn would have to be opened which would flood the bank where they were camping. Authorities came by several times and told them to move because the area was going to flood and alarms were sounded but they ignored the warnings. Eventually the whole family including their small children ended up drowning. The reason I remember this story is I had hiked through that exact spot the day before.
18 campers on the Kurokura River were swept away in the town of Yamakita, Kanagawa Prefecture.
[...]
Sources said those who were camping on the sandbar were told by local police to leave because of a possible flash flood.
A siren Friday evening, some added, also served as warning that the Kurokura Dam, 4 km upstream from the campers, was to release water.
[...]
A friend of the campers had also stopped by the site early Saturday morning to urge them to evacuate the area.
Tomomi Hakomori, 47, who was camping at the site, said “I was really scared in the pouring rain” upon hearing the siren Friday night.
Although Hakomori evacuated the area, only three other campers followed, he said.
[...]
At 6 a.m. Saturday, one of the campers in the group who had spent the night in a car came back to the campsite and urged them to pack up. The campers, however, evaluated the river and determined that things were fine since “nothing has changed.”
But half an hour later, the flood gate was opened at the dam to release water that was about to overflow.
Before the gate was opened, witnesses said local police and dam authorities argued bitterly over the releasing of water.
Police reportedly tried to keep dam operators from opening the gate, citing the campers who refused to leave. But dam officials argued that the facility was near full and holding any more water would break the dam.
Russell wrote:In this case, the police should have taken the campers in protective custody.
Russell wrote:In this case, the police should have taken the campers in protective custody.
Coligny wrote:to put it simply. they sux and have a whole countrywide system to make anything suck even more in order to protect their view of themselves as rainbow shitting do gooders who's farts do not stink... their crisis management sux, their judicial system sux, their nukaplants sux, their driving sux, their flying skills sux, their army sux. And everytime their system is stress tested it collapse upon itself and there is enough shit dropped on so many fans that the planet could look like a chocolate ball. and when they miraculously make it through thanks to some divine intervention or out of pity from some summerian demon. Like the good fucking imbeciles they are, they learn no lessons and just consider that everything should have worked, it was just a case of bad luck, can't happen again, they have stats to prove it...
Clashing energy interests on the Japanese island of Kyushu have prompted Japan's government to clamp down on solar power development nationwide. While the government calls it a necessary revision to assure grid stability amidst rapidly rising levels of intermittent solar energy, critics see a pro-nuclear agenda at work—one that could stunt Japan's renewable energy potential.
"France's nuclear industry is in turmoil after the country's main reactor manufacturer, Areva, reported a loss for 2014 of 4.8 billion euros ($5.3 billion) — more than its entire market value.
Return to Earthquakes, Tsunamis, Nukes, and other Catastrophes
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest