omae mona wrote:Coligny wrote:I won't ask what mathematical marvel that makes radiation and Daichi safe for the whole country.
The "mathematical marvel" is the specific numbers measuring radiation levels, compared with the amount of radiation it takes to increase the risk of cancer. I know this may sound like fancy math to you, but you probably studied multiplication once in your childhood even if you have forgotten it.
Awesome, here we go again... Which radiation level ? Airborne ? Internal accidental exposition ? Food, drink water, rainwater, dust, radioactive debris incinerations, use of contamined material in concrete...
In one sentence you have shown that no matter how many truth and technicality you hide behind, you are ignoring the scope of the problem... It also goes inline with the complete refutal of any possibility that "hot particles" may be lethal or even exist...
If you narrow any problem to only the parameters that fit your argumentation... Sure the numbers will fit too... You might as well start from the conclusion...