wagyl wrote:Russell wrote:Tsuru wrote:We already know the answers to all of these questions. These leads will be to our good and loyal rich friends in the KSA and Qatar, and absolutely nothing will come of it. We need these people to keep buying our weapons, airliners and luxury cars.
That appears to be the consensus, but without a proper investigation we don't know for sure.
I am glad that your attitude has changed from yesterday, Russell, when consensus about Mohammed Emwazi was enough, and investigating too risky, that an alleged execution (he is now apparently "probably dead" in the Pentagon's opinion) was OK enough to want to watch a video of it. You might be lucky: "probably dead" might mean he lingered on in pain, which makes for a longer video.
Well, I prefer him to be in court, but there are some practical problems with that, as I said. At the same time I do recognize the moral and legal problems with the use of drones to kill people by remote control. It is just that I find this Jihadi John so revolting, that I will not shed one tear for his death. I did not watch any of his beheading videos, because I saw one beheading video a decade ago and they are all the same, but it is nice for a change to see the tables turned.
Back to the Paris shooting, my opinion is generally mostly aligned with yours and Wage Slave's, but I sometimes feel the need for sarcasm, because, well because...