Zeitgeist

[Aho Kun]

[GV]-594683847743189197[/GV]

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-594683847743189197

Very interesting film, i dont wanna say much about it but i really advise you watch it all. First 20mins arnt great but stick with it.
Also the films director produced this for free so nothing illegal ^-^

[Adhesive]

Watched this back when it was first making the rounds... all I have to say is make sure to check their webpage first, which clarifies and retracts a few statements, and also lists citations for most of their assertions. I love a good consipiracy theory, so I don't want to sound as if I'm trying to debunk the film, but if I remember correctly, the majority of the religious stuff came from a single book.

[kurohinge1]

Watched this back when it was first making the rounds... all I have to say is make sure to check their webpage first, which clarifies and retracts a few statements, and also lists citations for most of their assertions. I love a good consipiracy theory, so I don't want to sound as if I'm trying to debunk the film, but if I remember correctly, the majority of the religious stuff came from a single book.

You did remember right. And it reminds me of that expression "people in glass houses shouldn't throw stones":

In the Gauntlet, Jordyn Marcellus wrote it was ironic that the film's viewers "have blindly followed the documentary without doing their own research." He states that, though the film is "well-edited and is truly compelling", it "glosses over inconvenient facts," uses "deceptive filmmaking" and that "for a film that rails against deception, there's a lot of deception implicit in its creation." . . . more

[Aho Kun]

yeah the religious part doesnt bother me so much in the film, ive never been religious cause no matter what way you look at it science has proved it to be wrong imo.

But part two and three of this film are eyye opening and just a few hours looking around the net you can see other sources that correspond to it.

[nottu]

[Torimaro]

its fun to watch i think. the first part is kinda silly and im sick of arguing religion (it`s like arguing with Charles). The second part is pretty far out there, some questions are posed worth asking but the answers to those questions are sorta stupid (eyewitness accounts from people who were in a fucking warzone are kinda hard to put much faith in). The third part is interesting for the background it gives on the Federal Bank and I like that someone finally called Roosevelt what he was, a fucking banker. Also the dystopian allusions get me going cuz i love that shit but i get the feeling some people could come away from it with a "the jews have all the money" outlook.

[Aho Kun]

its fun to watch i think. the first part is kinda silly and im sick of arguing religion (it`s like arguing with Charles). The second part is pretty far out there, some questions are posed worth asking but the answers to those questions are sorta stupid (eyewitness accounts from people who were in a fucking warzone are kinda hard to put much faith in). The third part is interesting for the background it gives on the Federal Bank and I like that someone finally called Roosevelt what he was, a fucking banker. Also the dystopian allusions get me going cuz i love that shit but i get the feeling some people could come away from it with a "the jews have all the money" outlook.

Im glad you watched it all, like you say even if the film isnt perfect or comes across as propaganda, it still raises very interesting questions.

[hundefar]

I watched it a while back. Total waste of time. Fucking conspiracy nuts are like a cancer of stupidity spreading through the web. Eye opening? My ass, only if you are a complete wanker. FFS..I hate that stuff.

Mmmm...eye opening and ass..ass opening?

[meursault]

the second part, "Zeitgeist Addendum" is available since Oct 4th through google video:

[GV]7065205277695921912[/GV]