Hot Topics | |
---|---|
Her lawyers say this is the first ever such ruling which, at a stroke, appears to deny these welfare payments to the country's special permanent residents. The woman, who was born and brought up in Japan, said at a press conference afterwards that the judge's comments amount to "if you find life difficult here, go home". She plans to appeal.
maraboutslim wrote:I'm curious: how hard is it for a chinese woman, born in japan, who has been here damn near 80 years, to become a japanese citizen? i mean, if even debito can get citizenship...
Mulboyne wrote:She was born, I suppose, in 1932 so, for a good deal of her life, she wouldn't have had a straightforward route to naturalization and wouldn't have been encouraged to take it. It's only relatively recently that the government has made it easier.
Mulboyne wrote:".....She was born, I suppose, in 1932....."
Doctor Stop wrote:If she's been here that long, she may have had her Japanese citizenship taken away in 1947 and/or 1952. Prior to that, she may have been legally Japanese.
Greji wrote:Is she hot?
Doctor Stop wrote:If she's been here that long, she may have had her Japanese citizenship taken away in 1947 and/or 1952. Prior to that, she may have been legally Japanese.
Samurai_Jerk wrote:She's waaaay too young for you.
Samurai_Jerk wrote:She's waaaay too young for you.
Mulboyne wrote:A professor at Hitotsubashi University has argued the judge's ruling is inconsistent with Japan's 1979 ratification of the International Covenant on Human Rights which, among other things, guaranteed permanent residents access to public housing and the like.
IparryU wrote:That is really nice to hear, someone that is educated backing up someone despite their blood or status.
I just wish more Japanese (or people for that matter) would step up to the plate to help other people out of shenanigans like this.
Mulboyne wrote:She's also got the backing of a local lawyers group. After both rulings, they've held press conferences at their offices. Since she's a welfare claimant, it's likely they are doing this pro bono.
Yokohammer wrote:This is going to get interesting. It's partly a pride issue now, so there's likely to be extreme resistance. But I do hope the rulings are overturned without any ambiguity whatsoever. A nice solid precedent is what we need.
blacknois wrote:Japan is finally entering the 20th century of human rights.
Screwed Up Eyes wrote:...she can always go back to hubby and have him pummel the shite out of her again...
Mulboyne wrote:I assumed it was her husband but one article says things got bad for her when he fell ill. The reason she says she doesn't have any money is because relatives now control their joint bank account. Someone else in the household may have been giving her a bad time.
The Oita District Court ruled on Oct. 18 that foreigners with the right to permanent residence but without Japanese citizenship are not entitled to welfare benefits, rejecting the claims of a 78-year-old Chinese woman who sued after being denied benefits by the Oita city government.
In the ruling, Presiding Judge Yasuji Isshi said, "The Livelihood Protection Law is intended for Japanese citizens only. Welfare payments to non-citizens would be a form of charity. Non-citizens do not hold a right to receive payments."
The court rejected the woman's requests that it overturn the city's decision and order the commencement of payments. The woman intends to appeal. The ruling is the first in the country to deal with the issue of welfare payments to people with foreign citizenship and permanent residency in Japan.
According to the ruling, the woman has Chinese nationality but was born in Japan and holds the right to permanent residence. In December 2008, the woman applied to the welfare office in Oita city for welfare payments, but was turned down with the reason that she had "a comfortable amount of money" in her savings.
The main issues of the trial became whether the woman held the right as a foreigner to receive welfare payments and whether her financial status justified her receiving aid.
"Excluding foreign citizens from the protection of welfare benefits is not unconstitutional," said Isshi.
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 5 guests