McTojo wrote:I'm the pulsing cock of the nation. Not gay.
Well, you got the first part right at least...
Hot Topics | |
---|---|
McTojo wrote:I'm the pulsing cock of the nation. Not gay.
Greji wrote:Well, you got the first part right at least...
Screwed-down Hairdo wrote:Strictly speaking, he didn't quite do that, either. He should have used an indefinite article instead of the definite and the noun phrase completing the sentence was redundant.
McTojo wrote:If I had done that then I would be calling myself a dickhead.
McTojo wrote:If I had done that then I would be calling myself a dickhead.
The body of Nickeles Fernando was found in his cell in Tokyo last month hours after he had complained of chest pains and begged for a doctor to be called, campaigners said.
His death came two days after a government probe into two deaths at another immigration centre found there was inadequate medical care.
A rights group called Provisional Release Association in Japan (PRAJ) said Fernando, 57, was ignored by guards when he asked for medical help.
"He had begun to complain about severe chest pain at about 7am on November 22, but instead of calling a doctor, immigration officials moved him from a shared cell into a single one," PRAJ member Hiromitsu Masuda told AFP.
After checking on Fernando several times during the morning and finding him in the same position, a Sri Lankan translator went into the cell at around 1pm, said fellow PRAJ member Mitsuru Miyasako.
"At that time his body was already cold and had no pulse," he said. "The translator called immigration officials, then for the first time they began to do something."
"If it had been a Japanese person complaining of pain in his chest, this would never have happened."
[...]
Two days before Fernando's death, the justice ministry admitted another immigration centre at Ushiku northeast of Tokyo "did not have enough medical" facilities and failed to provide 24-hour access to in-house doctors.
That came after it investigated the March deaths of an Iranian man in his 30s who choked on food and a Cameroonian man in his 40s who was found unconscious in his cell.
In October last year, a Rohingya asylum-seeker collapsed and died at the Tokyo centre after staff failed to call for a medic, allegedly because the doctor was having lunch.
In a reversal, the Tokyo High Court determined Monday that the government was not responsible for the 2010 death of a Ghanaian alledgedly subjected to excessive force by immigration authorities while being deported.
In overturning a lower court’s ruling, presiding Judge Izumi Takizawa said the level of physical force used by officials to restrain Abubakar Awudu Suraj, who was 45 years old at the time of his death, was “not illegal” and even “necessary.”
“Immigration authorities’ effort to subdue him was necessary to ensure his deportation would go smoothly,” Takizawa said.
“They are not culpable” for his death, the judge concluded.
The ruling overturns an order by the Tokyo District Court in March 2014 that the government pay a combined ¥5 million in compensation to his widow, who is a Japanese citizen, and his mother, who lives in Ghana.
matsuki wrote:Video of the force available on youtube...yes?
Samurai_Jerk wrote:I don't know the full extent of his visa situation. However, he was married to a Japanese national but managed to overstay his visa. I'm assuming he wasn't on a spouse visa and just forgot to renew so maybe it was a common law marriage or for some reason the the MOJ didn't think he was deserving of a spouse visa and he couldn't get another one. Is it possible they were married after his visa expired?
I've known a few people who unless they were lying to me got legally married in Japan despite not being here legally. I've always wondered how that worked and whether or not that's still possible now that the local and national governments seem to be communicating better.
“We didn’t really get a chance to talk at the last meeting, they [Home Office officials] just went on and on. When we said where would my mother go when she got to Johannesburg, they said she could go to the Red Cross and get help,” she said.
legion wrote:The UK Home Office excels at being a complete wankstain
http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2016/feb/18/widow-92-return-south-africa-deportation-battle-myrtle-cothill
Widow, 92, must return to South Africa after losing deportation battleWidow, 92, must return to South Africa after losing deportation battle“We didn’t really get a chance to talk at the last meeting, they [Home Office officials] just went on and on. When we said where would my mother go when she got to Johannesburg, they said she could go to the Red Cross and get help,” she said.
The Home Office said in December that Cothill’s application was rejected as her “condition was not deemed to be life-threatening”...
yanpa wrote:Not a place I'd willingly immigrate back to. Pay a substantial 4-figure sum to get papers for the family, then still have the threat of deporatation hanging over them if my income drops below an arbitrary level? And let's not even talk about the ridiculous housing costs.
Hmm, guess the policies are working...
On the minus side, convicted kiddy-fiddler being sent back to live with the darkies instead of facing good British mob justice.
legion wrote:yanpa wrote:Not a place I'd willingly immigrate back to. Pay a substantial 4-figure sum to get papers for the family, then still have the threat of deporatation hanging over them if my income drops below an arbitrary level? And let's not even talk about the ridiculous housing costs.
Hmm, guess the policies are working...
On the minus side, convicted kiddy-fiddler being sent back to live with the darkies instead of facing good British mob justice.
Deportation is only for your wife, your kids can stay if they have Britanian Notionality
yanpa wrote:Now that's what I call a plan
wagyl wrote:yanpa wrote:Now that's what I call a plan
You plan to be a single papa?
Financial threshold requirement is denying the right to family life for British citizens and their non-EU partners, justices to hear
British citizens must earn more than £18,600 to bring over a non-EU spouse, rising to £22,400 if they have a child who does not have British citizenship, and an additional £2,400 for each subsequent child.
Critics argue that the law, introduced in July 2012, penalises 43% of the UK population and means British citizens in full-time employment on the minimum wage cannot enjoy the right to live with their families in the UK.
毎回インスタントのおかずばっかりで本当に健康的に不安です。ごはんのクオリティがあんまりにも酷すぎます。中に弁当を食べた後に吐き気する人もいます
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests