Greji wrote:They wouldn't take Cranky. He's too old. I can't go. I have something to do that day....
Got'sa make a money to pay them illitimate child supports...
Hot Topics | |
---|---|
Greji wrote:They wouldn't take Cranky. He's too old. I can't go. I have something to do that day....
Samurai_Jerk wrote:Speaking of honor, shouldn't Greji and Cranky be stepping up and joining those volunteers?
A group of researchers says the meltdown of a reactor at the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant could have been avoided if water injection had been carried out 4 hours earlier than it was.
The researchers at the Japan Atomic Energy Agency on Thursday reported the finding based on a computer simulation of the accident at the plant's No. 2 reactor.
The core meltdown took place within a few days after the reactor's cooling system failed due to the major earthquake and tsunami on March 11th.
The Tokyo Electric Power Company, or TEPCO, said earlier that data analysis shows that the cooling system may have stopped working shortly after 1 PM on March 14th.
The utility started injecting water to cool the reactor at around 8 PM that day, after reducing pressure in the facility. But by 8 PM the next day -- around 100 hours after the quake -- much of the reactor's fuel had melted and collected at the bottom of the reactor's pressure vessel.
The simulation suggests that if water had been injected by around 4 PM, it could have prevented the meltdown by lowering the temperature of the fuel before it reached 1,200 degrees Celsius, destroying the fuel's container.
Group leader Masashi Hirano says the damage to the fuel could have been avoided, and that he wonders why TEPCO did not start injecting water earlier despite difficulties.
TEPCO says it doesn't believe the operation was delayed, adding that workers did their best amid high radiation levels and other severe conditions.
Of the plant's 6 reactors, the No. 1 to No. 3 suffered meltdowns after losing cooling functions.
At the No. 2 reactor, a hydrogen explosion on March 15th caused the release and spread of massive amounts of radioactive substances.
Mike Oxlong wrote:Researchers say meltdown could have been avoided
2triky wrote:When well entrenched corporate interests are to blame, justice is never served.
Coligny wrote:Sometimes... when it become a matter of survival for some politician carreer... corporate interest become suddenly expandable...
(See Renault in 1945)
2triky wrote:I believe you meant to say "expendable." Notwithstanding your example, it's a rare occurrence.
THERE are many heroes in post 3/11 Japan. The mayor of Rikuzentakata, who ensured the safety of city residents only for his wife to perish, is one, as are the Tokyo firefighters who streamed up to Fukushima to spray water on the out-of-control reactors. But among those who deserve honour is also a humble bureaucrat at the trade ministry. In a system that prizes remaining nameless, faceless and not rocking the boat, Shigeaki Koga chose to step forward and reveal some of Japan's ugliest secrets.
After 3/11, Mr Koga decided speak out about the awful practices he had experienced while working on Japan's energy policy. The disaster at the Fukushima nuclear plant, run by TEPCO, is symptomatic of a wider malaise. The utility companies buy the academy by sponsoring research, buy the media through mountains of public-service advertisements and junkets, buy big business by paying top-dollar for everything, buy the bureaucrats and regulators by handing them cushy post-retirement jobs.
Talking to him one gets a chill down the spine. Often, bureaucrats are regarded as lemming-like self-interested do-nothings or devious micro-managers. But Mr Koga's brave words and deep understanding of how energy companies pad their costs, block competition, keep energy prices high and ultimately strangle Japan is an antidote to that image. Instead, the figure that emerges is a deeply intelligent, hard-working civil servant who wants the best for his country.
In the spring he devised his own restructuring plan for TEPCO that was utterly ignored by the ministry (which has long been in the pocket of the energy companies), though it won him plaudits from a handful of reformist politicians. He advocates opening the energy monopoly to competition and separating the power generation and transmission operations of today's ten regional monopolies.
If only his country would listen. His private views to colleagues landed him in the wilderness. Superiors told him to resign. Yet since going public with his revelations and criticisms, he has been placed into an even darker solitary confinement. His current assignment is, well, nothing. When he asked the previous trade minister, Banri Kaieda, for a meaningful post, Mr Kaieda was noncommittal. (When The Economist asked Mr Kaieda about Mr Koga's views, the then-trade minister dismissed it as something for "the long term". Translation: "Never".)
"I believe this is the final chance for Japan to change," Mr Koga said in May, when I asked him during a wide-ranging interview why he was speaking out. "If I shut my mouth and obtain a good post in the ministry—even if I did that, in a few years Japan's economy would plunge," he said. "That is why I am taking on risks, and I don't care if I have to resign. Because if I don't speak out, Japan will not change. It is meaningless for me to be in the government if I cannot advocate reform."...
Mike Oxlong wrote:Japan's shame
The good bureaucrat
But committee members decided they would not allow Tepco to hike electricity charges unless it considered cost-cutting measures, such as reducing pension payments and employees' salaries.
Yokohammer wrote:I really like this part:
But committee members decided they would not allow Tepco to hike electricity charges unless it considered cost-cutting measures, such as reducing pension payments and employees' salaries.
Screwed-down Hairdo wrote:Yeah, screw the rank-and-file who obviously must have made all the decisions that led to this cock-up.
Meanwhile, all those former white collar executives who collected dividends for decades at tax rates considerably lower than they are for income are really feeling the pinch having already missed a payout once this fiscal year...
Yokohammer wrote:Well hang on ...
I realize that much more has to be done, but this is a start. Gotta start somewhere. And I doubt that this means that only the employees will suffer. If that happens there's likely to be even more resistance. I'm interested to see where this goes.
Screwed-down Hairdo wrote:Yeah, screw the rank-and-file who obviously must have made all the decisions that led to this cock-up.
Meanwhile, all those former white collar executives who collected dividends for decades at tax rates considerably lower than they are for income are really feeling the pinch having already missed a payout once this fiscal year...
Screwed-down Hairdo wrote:Making only TEPCO workers pay is a sham and nothing more than a symbolic gesture (which isn't to say that it shouldn't be done anyway, but don't expect much more action than this...)
If people are serious about retribution for the nuclear disaster, then they should take a strong look at everyone responsible from the politicians and bureaucrats that decided to build them in the first place, the company executives that built the plant, the media for fawningly supporting nuclear power generation and even the U.S. military-industrial complex, which had a role and can be blamed for every ill on the planet (said with tongue firmly in cheap and written slowly so Mericans can understand I'm not really slagging them...). In short, this aint gonna happen. Once again, this cuntry decides to pick up a scapegoat, slap them on the wrist and ignore the fundamental problem.
Screwed-down Hairdo wrote:Japan to use disaster area food for overseas aid
Ganma wrote:I'm not sure that all those parties hold responsibility for the accident. They may be responsible for pushing through and supporting nuclear power but is not TEPCO solely responsible for safety measures at their own facilities? OK so the bureaucrats who rubber stamped TEPCOs flawed safety measures and passed the aging facilities every year (namely the LDP) are also responsible and should be held accountable, but that's as far as it goes.
??? Unbelievable. Look forward to mutant human variations appearing in Africa over the next decade.
Mike Oxlong wrote:[ythq]8vywZ84mixs[/ythq]
MrUltimateGaijin wrote:Basically the truth, when you look at how many reactors there are in the world it really is very safe.
Coligny wrote:http://ex-skf.blogspot.com/2011/09/japanese-government-to-invite.html
Jgov to invite 'influencial' Facebookjocks and twitterclowns in Japan to say how safe it is...
You just can't make that shit up...
MrUltimateGaijin wrote:Fuel Fatalities Who Deaths per TTY
Coal 6400 Workers 342
Hydro 4000 Public 883
Natural Gas 1200 Workers and Public 85
Nuclear 31 Workers 8
Coligny wrote:Yeah, that's the good thing with numbers and statistics...
There is always a way to find a formula whose results will cheer you up...
Greji wrote:I think they should replace the Fukushima plant by building a brand new facility in Toyohashi, right up close, where you can keep a close eye on it Coligny!
;)"Yeah, I've been always awkward toward women and have spent pathetic life so far but I could graduate from being a cherry boy by using geisha's pussy at last! Yeah!! And off course I have an account in Fuckedgaijin.com. Yeah!!!"
Return to Earthquakes, Tsunamis, Nukes, and other Catastrophes
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests