Hot Topics | |
---|---|
chokonen888 wrote:..instead they penetrated stockholders with a well lubed kancho
wagyl wrote:Stretching (ewwww) that metaphor, I thought the issue here was that they didn't use sufficient lube. Enough lube and they could have retired before it all slithered out again!
wagyl wrote:Stretching (ewwww) that metaphor, I thought the issue here was that they didn't use sufficient lube. Enough lube and they could have retired before it all slithered out again!
Coligny wrote:Olympus bought buy Essilor for pennies in 3... 2... 1...
After all, successfully correcting Japanese fuck ups is becoming some sort of nationnal tradition...
Russell wrote:I do not get the point. Essilor appears to be a successful company. Maybe they can buy Olympus?
Coligny wrote:Olympus bought buy Essilor for pennies in 3... 2... 1...
After all, successfully correcting Japanese fuck ups is becoming some sort of nationnal tradition...
Woodford said that "many more things" are now likely to be revealed about a company that has appeared unable to come clean about the practices in its business. He said that "a child" presented with the evidence he circulated internally before he was told to leave would have realised something was wrong...
...Some of the values which helped Japan rebuild after the Second World War are now, Woodford argues, in danger of strangling the country's business sector. The country needs, he says, thorough reform. "Prime Minister Yoshihiko Noda said he doesn't want the world to think that corporate Japan is like Olympus," Woodford said. "My view is that the thing that is profoundly wrong in Japan is the cross-shareholding. It arose after World War Two alongside [the notions of] consensus and harmony, and it has served the country well.
"But now the way the world is, what has happened in Japan is that everyone owns each other so it is a taboo to criticise another company and you never sell the stock. That has led to a situation where managements can stay unless a company goes into liquidation, no matter how incompetent they are. Olympus has no remuneration committee. There is no appointments committee. So the gift of the next presidency is in the hands [of the present one].That creates a culture of sycophancy and yes men. These are common elements that exist in Japan. The non-executive directors, [they are] jobs for retired old boys. There are issues here that would be common in many Japanese companies."
Mulboyne wrote:... He is openly calling for Woodford to be brought back to restore confidence in the firm ...
Yokohammer wrote:So now, if all agree that Woodford should be brought back in to make things right, d'ya think he'll do it?
Mulboyne wrote:If you read that Telegraph interview, he says he wants to return.
When this story first broke, I did wonder whether we were in danger of overestimating Woodford's ability to run a major Japanese company, regardless of how justified his allegations were. He has now been proved right but it doesn't indicate whether he has the full range of skills necessary. He may well have them but he's still unproven.
Now, however, I don't think that matters. What seems more important is what Woodford represents. He's a company man who others can rally around and the company needs a figurehead like that. It's a bit embarrassing to have an Olympus meishi right now and the rank and file need to feel proud of what they do.
If you reach outside the company, there aren't many executives with a stronger claim than Woodford so he should probably be given the job, working with a board he can trust.
Greji wrote:Good points Mulby, but there is also the reason that by bringing Woodford back, they have a double backstop. If he sucessfully turns the company around, they're back on the feet and have won. If the company continues to sink into oblivion, he has to be part of the blame and can be "rightously" dismissed in the next change around, thus in part, defending the old guard.
Dreamy_Peach wrote:If he does decide to return then he's certainly a bigger man than I.
My own reaction would be "fuck em".
But still, should he return the primary satisfaction would be through telling that little man that told him to get the bus to the airport that he's fired.
chokonen888 wrote:What bigger "fuck you" to those who ousted him can there be than returning to the same office as "Da Man" and cleaning house? I'm sure he can take the extra step to ensure his Japanese cultural sensitivity and demonstrate it by forcing all them old bastards to publicly give up and bonuses/severance packages/etc. for the good of the firm
Catoneinutica wrote:In fact, as we know from cases as temporally remote as those of Koito and Bulldog Sauce, it positively loathes active foreign investment.
chokonen888 wrote:I'm not familiar with the Koito and Bulldog cases though, care to elaborate?
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 7 guests