As if gaijin men didn't have a bad enough reputation...

[dimwit]

Tee hee heee hahaha.

I'm pretty sure that Take is aware of the joke, but for those who don't see it, Take is claiming that "Chinese, Koreans and hysterical women are unable to see other people as individuals, and can only see them as a group and can only think of them having group behaviours." Take, himself, is much better than that, and as an example, he shows that he can regard Chinese, Koreans and hysterical women as individuals, and does not attribute stereotypical behaviour to any of the individual members of those groups. Tack så mycket, Tak!

I'm pretty sure that one of these days Take will go postal in a women compartment of a train, and given Japan's guilt by association legal system, I don't wnat to be anywhere near here when that happens.

[Takechanpoo]

Thank God some of us have risen above all that and don't class all Koreans into a group for criticism.

Or Chinese or women, for that matter.

its surprising that you still havent yet discovered several common traits among c,k and hysterical women.
lying, framing up and trapping you out of spite, thick-facedly betraying as if nothing happened, using any mean means necessary to kick down their enemy.
i do not think its a fallacy of composition.

I found those to be common traits among Japanese employers.

there are some exceptions in everything. but exception is exception. no more than it.
go to buy good glasses and a hearing aid.

[Wage Slave]

Thank God some of us have risen above all that and don't class all Koreans into a group for criticism.

Or Chinese or women, for that matter.

its surprising that you still havent yet discovered several common traits among c,k and hysterical women.
lying, framing up and trapping you out of spite, thick-facedly betraying as if nothing happened, using any mean means necessary to kick down their enemy.
i do not think its a fallacy of composition.

I found those to be common traits among Japanese employers.

there are some exceptions in everything. but exception is exception. no more than it.
go to buy good glasses and a hearing aid.

Just so we are abreast of your hates Tacky, I make it, in no particular order:

Korean people
Chinese people (of any kind)
Women people (of any kind)
Australian people
Old people
People who live in Japan who are not Japanese people.

Did I leave anyone out? Please advise.

[Samurai_Jerk]

Thank God some of us have risen above all that and don't class all Koreans into a group for criticism.

Or Chinese or women, for that matter.

its surprising that you still havent yet discovered several common traits among c,k and hysterical women.
lying, framing up and trapping you out of spite, thick-facedly betraying as if nothing happened, using any mean means necessary to kick down their enemy.
i do not think its a fallacy of composition.

I found those to be common traits among Japanese employers.

there are some exceptions in everything. but exception is exception. no more than it.
go to buy good glasses and a hearing aid.

Yeah, there are exceptions. I hear a few Japanese employers are actually decent.

[Taro Toporific]

Just so we are abreast of your hates Tacky, I make it, in no particular order:

Korean people
Chinese people (of any kind)
Women people (of any kind)
Australian people
Old people
People who live in Japan who are not Japanese people.

Did I leave anyone out? Please advise.

ME! (Handicapped people)

[Wage Slave]

Just so we are abreast of your hates Tacky, I make it, in no particular order:

Korean people
Chinese people (of any kind)
Women people (of any kind)
Australian people
Old people
People who live in Japan who are not Japanese people.

Did I leave anyone out? Please advise.

ME! (Handicapped people)

Oh yes! How could I forget. Apologies. So, in no particular order:

Korean people
Chinese people (of any kind)
Women people (of any kind)
Australian people
Old people
People who live in Japan who are not Japanese people
Handicapped people

Any more?

[wagyl]

Anyone who is not Takechanpoo?

[Samurai_Jerk]

Anyone who is not Takechanpoo?

I'm pretty sure he hates him too.

[GomiGirl]

Anyone who is not Takechanpoo?

I'm pretty sure he hates him too.

Does he get out of the house and interacts with real people or are all these opinions just created from the internet connection from his Mum's basement?

[Grumpy Gramps]

There's the problem. Japanese houses have no basements, just crawl spaces.

[matsuki]

There's the problem. Japanese houses have no basements, just crawl spaces.

Ok ok, his dark room, lined with piss-filled pet bottles.

[Russell]

There's the problem. Japanese houses have no basements, just crawl spaces.

So you think Takechan is a Flatlander?

I actually think he is a Linelander. He sounds so 1-dimensional...

[Takechanpoo]

why have nobody posted this yet?

Former motorcycle racing champion Wayne Gardner was arrested at the Japan Grand Prix over an alleged road-rage incident. The 57-year-old was reportedly questioned by Japanese police after being accused of assaulting three Tokyo men during a scuffle. The 1987 500cc champion got into a heated dispute after his car scratched the men's vehicle near the Twin Ring Motegi circuit, police claimed. The Australian motorcycle legend allegedly grabbed each of the men by the collar and pushed them around, a local police spokesman said.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... -Prix.html

[Grumpy Gramps]

1-dimensional...

Living in a crawl space might flatten your horizon a little.

[Coligny]

why have nobody posted this yet?

image043.jpg

ermugerd...

[Takechanpoo]

Tee hee heee hahaha.

I'm pretty sure that Take is aware of the joke, but for those who don't see it, Take is claiming that "Chinese, Koreans and hysterical women are unable to see other people as individuals, and can only see them as a group and can only think of them having group behaviours." Take, himself, is much better than that, and as an example, he shows that he can regard Chinese, Koreans and hysterical women as individuals, and does not attribute stereotypical behaviour to any of the individual members of those groups. Tack så mycket, Tak!

I'm pretty sure that one of these days Take will go postal in a women compartment of a train, and given Japan's guilt by association legal system, I don't wnat to be anywhere near here when that happens.

woman-only carriage is a kind of emergency evacuation measure to protect women from groping by the part of men while neglecting the social consistency and fairness. you seem to tolerate it. ok. its pretty nice. seriously. so then how about japanese-only shops? eh? ah? its as well a kind of (private) emergency evacuation measure to protect their precious shops from rude and vulgar behaviors by some fucking gaijin dudes while neglecting the social consistency and fairness. if you tolerate the former, you should also do the latter. or if you do not tolerate the latter, you should not do the former. which one is your choice? huh?

[matsuki]

Private shop selling to "Japanese only" looks about as douchey as you riding the women only carriage.

Even if you don't think the women only carriages are the right answer, the absurd amount of groping that takes place is a pretty undeniable problem. How would you propose to solve it?

[Yokohammer]

Take-chan.

Your point, that no-men-allowed train carriages are similar to no-gaijin-allowed restaurants or bars, and that if you tolerate one then logically you should tolerate the other, would not be unfair if the motivations were also similar. The problem is that women-only train carriages exist because women actually get harassed by men in the trains, whereas a lot of Japanese-only establishments exists purely because of unfounded fear/dislike of different people. Another name for that is "racism."

[kurogane]

Yes, well said, that too. Except for the bath houses in Otaru. They mistreated Debuwinckle's daughter but those drunk Russians are simply intolerable. Most of it is as you said, though.

woman-only carriage is a kind of emergency evacuation measure to protect women from groping by the part of men while neglecting the social consistency and fairness.

If it protects women from sexual assault doesn't it promote social consistency and fairness by allowing them the same level of protection afforded the men from random assault? The subsequent red herring aside, that isn't not just not logical it's demented. By that I mean that either all members deserve fair and consistent protection under the law, or they don't. Are you suggesting that women don't? That is the thrust of your argument, logically speaking. Why should the usual or potential victims be expected to preserve a principle not preserved by a measurable portion of those you regard as the victims of this inconsistency?

[matsuki]

I still wish they would simply start putting cameras on the trains here...I know that is an unpossible amount of teeth-sucking responsibility but considering all the crazy shit that happens on the trains and how useful it could be to track someone escaping a crime scene, it's probably worth it.

[wagyl]

This guy is part of the trial program.

Actual viewing of the footage to find whatever of the many crimes you are considering searching for the perpetrators for, has been crowdsourced by posting it to youtube. You just have to have AI searching through the comments to find what they are looking for!

Matsuki, you have an amazing "ends justify the means" mentality, let along not considering how you search through two cameras per carriage full time footage to find someone. It is not going to be real time tracking, so I don't know how much importance can be placed on "apparently white male boarded at Hi..shi..shi.. and got off at Ta..da..ba.." when we find the footage two days later.

I doubt the effort is really worth the crazy shit. Looking at the sleazier corners of the internet and people posting their boners and wanking off while on the bus, you very rarely hear that those disclosures result in punishment for the people involved.

[matsuki]

I didn't mean for proactive searching but when a crime is reported, to be able to search the massive amounts of footage for an incident would still be useful. Then again, I'm mister dashcam on every vehicle possible...

[Samurai_Jerk]

If we're all so concerned these delicate little flowers can't handle the real world, shouldn't they stay the fuck home. Maybe we could let them out only if accompanied by a male relative.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Coligny]

I still wish they would simply start putting cameras on the trains here...I know that is an unpossible amount of teeth-sucking responsibility but considering all the crazy shit that happens on the trains and how useful it could be to track someone escaping a crime scene, it's probably worth it.

Yes and microphones too. With a direct upload link to the intel hq.

[Takechanpoo]

Take-chan.

Your point, that no-men-allowed train carriages are similar to no-gaijin-allowed restaurants or bars, and that if you tolerate one then logically you should tolerate the other, would not be unfair if the motivations were also similar. The problem is that women-only train carriages exist because women actually get harassed by men in the trains, whereas a lot of Japanese-only establishments exists purely because of unfounded fear/dislike of different people. Another name for that is "racism."

i dont think they originally had racism at the beginning to shut gaijins out. they just did it to simply protect their bread and butter. in other words its an unintetionaly racism as a result, unfortunately. but whatever it is, racism is racism. its the very reason you gaijins get pissed off and oppose to it. and also woman-only carriage was introduced to protect womens butt and its sexism as a result. regardless of whether its intentional or not, sexism is sexism. and its the reason some japanese guys get pissed off and oppose to it.
there is no difference between debito and these oyajis.

If it protects women from sexual assault doesn't it promote social consistency and fairness by allowing them the same level of protection afforded the men from random assault? The subsequent red herring aside, that isn't not just not logical it's demented. By that I mean that either all members deserve fair and consistent protection under the law, or they don't. Are you suggesting that women don't? That is the thrust of your argument, logically speaking. Why should the usual or potential victims be expected to preserve a principle not preserved by a measurable portion of those you regard as the victims of this inconsistency?

inside your pseudo-liberal brain, perpetrator is always man and victim is always woman. funny. i teach you a word 痴女(chijo).

AP-315-1.jpg

20100116b_1.jpg

Ci110306105017.jpg

the point is whether or not its to function as a deterrent to restrain groping. so its not necessarily a woman-only one. for example, a carriage for the ppl to need help is enough for it. and the social fairness will be kept.

[Russell]

inside your pseudo-liberal brain, perpetrator is always man and victim is always woman. funny. i teach you a word 痴女(chijo).

AP-315-1.jpg

20100116b_1.jpg

Ci110306105017.jpg

the point is whether or not its to function as a deterrent to restrain groping. so its not necessarily a woman-only one. for example, a carriage for the ppl to need help is enough for it. and the social fairness will be kept.

Point taken, Take.

I see these scenes on my commute everyday.

So, yeah, I can understand why the average heterosexual guy would want to be on a men-only carriage...

[Takechanpoo]

actually JR and other j-train companies do need to have men-only carriages to protect men from false accusation of groping if they continue having women-only ones. hell yeah

[kurogane]

Point taken, Take.
I see these scenes on my commute everyday....

Free Wifi on the trains makes the commute pass that much more quickly, I'm sure. The only similar scenes I ever got to watch on my commute were from the greasy bucktooths beside me loudly reading their rape comics.

Anyways, nice point Russell, well said. I must say I was a little surprised to see that an attractive and accomplished professional like Saori Hara has to resort to public groping and got caught in the act, but I was always a bigger fan of Azumi Mizushima's Drunken Elevator Woman in Heat.

Take,
Was Saori-chan severely disciplined for that or did she get off with a spanking? I hope her sentence was suspended; she seems to like that sort of thing.

[matsuki]

Take just wants a men only carriage so the minute a female gets on, he can J-logic "she wanted it, she got on a men only carriage" and get his grope on.

[kurogane]

Wouldn't she be arrested before he got the chance? I was thinking he would like a men's only carriage so he could get his grope on with his preferred targets, but you might be right.

I would be quite happy on a men's only carriage but that would give too much fodder and comfort to these Champions of Impotence like that whiney lady boy in the video he posted. Men's Rights are for limp dicks and retards, which is a shame because there are issues worth discusson, but not after it's been hijacked by the panty wetters.