US Press version: Trump feels up Korean prostitute!
http://www.asahi.com/ajw/articles/AJ201711080046.html
http://archive.is/Dts1L

Hot Topics | |
---|---|
Wage Slave wrote:wangta wrote:Taka-Okami wrote:Maybe. The grave of my Uncle in Borneo killed by the Japanese on the death march has not made me hate Japanese people. Anecdotal I know...War is War, shit things happened, it was a long time ago. I think everyone's pretty much dead from that era anyway? So why care about it anymore, no apology needed.
Looking at the translated article, it says something about "taking over the whole world'. I dont think so. USA cut off oil supplies so they had to go for Indo oil fields among other places. Moreover, Japan was doing nothing the Western powers weren't doing already. They just didn't want the Yellow Man to take some of the action. As usual the winner writes the history.
I broadly agree with you mate and I think that generations who had nothing to do with the perpetrators of agressive actions, war, etc should not be blamed for previous generations that did. However, that's different from the constant Jp iiwake of 'No, we weren't like the Nazis/Germans. We were completely different.' This is propaganda, this is bullshit.
Your point about resources is broadly true but other empires like that of the British were built up over a few hundred years. The Japanese did their empire building in a period that was about 50 years, but seized countries and resources in fast, brutal attacks - and I aint saying the British/Europeans weren't brutal as well. But the Japanese version can be judged for its brutality very clearly as the takeover of Korea, for example, including the sudden assassination of the Empress in her palace.
The outrages against the Korean civilian population are well documented like photos of Korean girls being dragged by their hair from peaceful pro-independence protests in the street. The Japanese colonizers had little notion of some respect for civilians including women, teenagers, and children. The invasion of Manchuria in China was littered with the corpses of Chinese people, many of them civilians. And of course there is Nanjing - the only thing that is in dispute is the numbers.
Everytime I hear another Japanese zombie who claims to be educated telling me that Japan was different from the Nazis tempts me to gather together the documented and available testimonies of survivors from hospitals in Singapore where Japanese troops burst in and massacred patients on operating tables, doctors, nurses and other staff. Pure evil.
Malaysia, Burma, Singapore and other colonized countries had their own verified accounts of Japanese atrocities. I don't show the Japanese this evidence. I'm an English teacher, not a history teacher. If they want to be ignorant, let them. You can't fix stupid unless stupid shows some willingness to learn.
The Sikh soldiers who fought in the British army during WW2 knew of fucking evil shit that happened on islands like the cannibalism of POWs. They testified after WW2. This was not Japanese military policy but every evil piece of scum who ordered the POWs to be killed and then helped themselves to their flesh because of lack of food supplies, should have been hung by their heels in a remote area full of wild animals until they died.
The Allies did not pursue this as they had too much to already pursue. There are credible accounts by Sikh survivors of that time -I think the POWS who were cannibalised were not Sikh. And Unit 731 - straight out of Dr Mengele's playbook. But for some reason, Asian and other victims of Unit 731 aren't as important apparently as the Jewish victims of Mengele.
The facts above are just the tip of the iceberg. There are reasons that the Nazi and Japanese birds flocked together.
Yes. Exactly - why do we have to keep repeating it? The only thing I would add is that I think everyone should also recognise the enormous suffering imposed on the Japanese people as well. That suffering was extreme and it was not imposed by the allies but by the Japanese regime on its own people. From conscription and abuse to refusing to heed the Potsdam Declaration Tojo and crew committed crime against their own people. Just read some of the POW/soldiers' accounts to realise how little the military command cared about their own soldiers when they were facing impossible odds or got injured. They were utterly disposable too.
TennoChinko wrote:The Koreans got their chief comfort woman activist LEE Yong-soo to greet Trump at last night's state dinner.
Most articles indicated they shook hands but the news footage shows she reached out to embrace him which he awkwardly received. I half-expected the CNN headlines to proclaim "TRUMP MOLESTS KOREAN PROSTITUTE!"
But here is the strange thing ... in this December 28 2015 NY TIMES photo essay
The New York Times Korea’s Comfort Women: The Fight to Be Heard
https://www.nytimes.com/slideshow/2015/ ... -HDSJ.html
we have,Lee Yong-soo, 67, said she went to Japan looking for work when she was 16 but ended up in Taiwan. Her first sexual experience was being raped aboard the ship on her way to Taiwan. Once there, she said, she was tortured when she at first refused to have sex with a Japanese soldier.
CreditYunghi Kim/Contact Press Images
That would make it impossible for Lee Yong-soo to have been a so-called comfort woman during WW II...she would have been born 3 years after WWII had ended.
Screenshot:
https://i.imgur.com/GEL4i1n.jpg
wangta wrote:Maybe being a Wage Slave has dimmed your reasoning ability lately. I understand mate - my job is full on shitty at the moment not the least because the cunt who owns the company seems to honestly believe his Engrish teachers should be grateful for his scumbag attitudes. The reason 'why we have to keep repeating it' is precisely because this reality has been denied and is still being denied by Jp govts, education authorities and some mainstream media.
I'd say the forced suicides of thousands of Okinawan civilians by the Japanese military deserves some consideration both at the national level and in textbooks both at high school and university in Japan.
The denial of historical facts led to right wing Nippon Kaigi member Koike who is now the Mayor of Tokyo censoring school textbooks that would have given even a mild truth injection that yes, Japan invaded, colonised and had an alliance with Nazi Germany.
Not even the hard truths like yes, some of the things the Japanese military and non military did were more than compatible with Nazi Germany. Especially butchering civilians and performing live medical experiments on mostly Chinese people, and conducting physical and sexual assaults and butchery against civilians in Nanjing. The Chinese in the People's Republic will never forgive this blatant suppression of historical facts.
You can even link these facts with why the bombs were dropped at HIroshima and Nagasaki. Forget all the drivel about how unfair it was because Japan was seeking negotiations with the Soviet Union about ending the war. Too little, too late for the Japanese militarist scumbags. Of course nobody in the Allied Forces and nobody in the Soviet Union was going to have Japan trying to bend the cessation of war terms to their own deluded thinking.
And terrible as the bombs were, and morally questionable as they were, they prevented hundreds of thousands of Japan's opponents' forces dying in an invasion of Japan. Of course the Japanese were no priority by this time. Why should they have been, why should this ally of Nazi Germany have received any benefit of the doubt? Their record of slaughter in Asia spoke for itself. Nobody was prepared to negotiate with them.
Just the fact that so many Japanese don't know all these facts and more, and keep persisting that Japan was nothing like Nazi Germany in its behaviour, tells me that there needs to be some repetition of cold hard facts.
matsuki wrote:The Japanese in Australia on ANZAC clueless as to why some rowdy Aussies are calling them JAP and telling them to fuck off doesn't require belief in any propaganda. If they come out of school without even basic knowledge of the facts, obviously there is a problem....
Takechanpoo wrote: j-side kindly noticed aussie-side several times that they had no willing to invade aussieland.
Takechanpoo wrote:... textbooks are almost dont used in the classes in j-high/junior high schools, though. and even in the univ-entrance exam study, students almost dont use textbooks. you guys dont know this basic thing in j-schooling? eh?
wagyl wrote:Takechanpoo wrote: j-side kindly noticed aussie-side several times that they had no willing to invade aussieland.
I would be interested to hear more about this.
Cetacean needed.
BigInJapan wrote:Takechanpoo wrote:... textbooks are almost dont used in the classes in j-high/junior high schools, though. and even in the univ-entrance exam study, students almost dont use textbooks. you guys dont know this basic thing in j-schooling? eh?
Are you completely ignorant? (No need to answer.)
I'm guessing you went to jr/sr high school during the Yutori education (ゆとり教育 - pressure-free education) period.
My kids (jr. high and uni) could tell you that they definitely DO use all of the textbooks now, and there is an abundance of homework.
/ And now back to the thread topic
Wage Slave wrote:Cetaceans, Tacky?![]()
wagyl wrote:You might not have seen, since you have him on ignore, but since he has pissed you and others off enough, he has had less ammunition to shoot back with, and things have been a little more civil. We all say thank you.
BigInJapan wrote:Takechanpoo wrote:... textbooks are almost dont used in the classes in j-high/junior high schools, though. and even in the univ-entrance exam study, students almost dont use textbooks. you guys dont know this basic thing in j-schooling? eh?
Are you completely ignorant? (No need to answer.)
I'm guessing you went to jr/sr high school during the Yutori education (ゆとり教育 - pressure-free education) period.
My kids (jr. high and uni) could tell you that they definitely DO use all of the textbooks now, and there is an abundance of homework.
/ And now back to the thread topic
Wage Slave wrote:matsuki wrote:The Japanese in Australia on ANZAC clueless as to why some rowdy Aussies are calling them JAP and telling them to fuck off doesn't require belief in any propaganda. If they come out of school without even basic knowledge of the facts, obviously there is a problem....
I abhor innocent people being subject to racist abuse but there is a valid point here.
Takechanpoo wrote:as for what happened between japan and aussie, totally no need for japanese to have any single piece of sense of sin and shame. by the way, this is one of the reason that i call aussie a mental-retarded son among anglo brothers.
Wage Slave wrote:Combine that blank space with a powerful and well connected group of people promoting a potent combination of denial, re-writing & whataboutism and there is reason for a lot of people in many countries to be concerned. And actually the Japanese people have as much reason to be concerned as anyone - they paid a terrible price too.
Wage Slave wrote:Cetaceans, Tacky?![]()
Taka-Okami wrote:Takechanpoo is a troll. Ignore it.
whataboutism
Takechanpoo wrote:between japan and aussie, who declared war was not japan but aussie, despite the fact that j-side kindly noticed aussie-side several times that they had no willing to invade aussieland. so it was a legitimate act of war that j-empire air-raided the military facilities in darwin, which of the opponent themselves declared war. no reason for japan to be condemned about it, needless to say. but somewhat aussies have been taught it as one of evil deeds committed by j-empire and still angry at it. it means they still have continued a anti-japan propaganda in their school. and it seems that aussie are not good at properly connecting the relation between cause and effect.
and there are many testimonies left in which among the allied soldiers it was aussie who ruthlessly most shot j-soldiers unarmed and surrendered to death, rejecting to even take them prisoners. and among the countries which kidnapped innocent j-civilians to internment camps, it was only aussie that even forcibly deported those innocent j-civilians to japan after ww2.
most of aussies dont even know who declared war was themselves between the two countries and sometwat they even behave like an innocent naive victims tormented by j-empire, shutting their eyes to their own evil deeds.
as for what happened between japan and aussie, totally no need for japanese to have any single piece of sense of sin and shame.
by the way, this is one of the reason that i call aussie a mental-retarded son among anglo brothers.
wangta wrote:
True about Aussie soldiers not taking enough prisoners and choosing to shoot some numbers of Jp prisoners. Morally unjustifiable on a basic level of human decency.
However, in the context of what they knew about the Jp Imperial Army's policies of death marches, starved Allied POWs being made to construct railways in Burma, their Jp overseers extracting every last fraction of health and human dignity from their abused bodies, bayoneted patients, nurses and doctors in Singapore, cruelties in Malaysia and the Dutch East Indies, and of course the cannibalism of POWs by starving Japanese soldiers - and these are only a selection of the war crimes well documented - I think it's understandable some Aussie soldiers chose to shoot their Japanese military prisoners instead of giving them the protections afforded POWs under international agreements.
If I'd been an Allied/Aussie soldier and knew among the Jp prisoners were those who'd killed and cannibalised non Jp soldiers, or murdered hospital patients and staff. I'd have put a bullet or two in them.These Jp prisoners' deaths were humane compared to what happened to their enemies.
As for Roosevelt allowing the Japanese POWs to be sent to Russia - same thing again. The rights of the Japanese Imperial forces were the last thing on Allied minds. At least the Nazis didn't bullshit about their crimes but became more and more open about what they intended to do and what they did.
Takechanpoo wrote:wangta wrote:
True about Aussie soldiers not taking enough prisoners and choosing to shoot some numbers of Jp prisoners. Morally unjustifiable on a basic level of human decency.
However, in the context of what they knew about the Jp Imperial Army's policies of death marches, starved Allied POWs being made to construct railways in Burma, their Jp overseers extracting every last fraction of health and human dignity from their abused bodies, bayoneted patients, nurses and doctors in Singapore, cruelties in Malaysia and the Dutch East Indies, and of course the cannibalism of POWs by starving Japanese soldiers - and these are only a selection of the war crimes well documented - I think it's understandable some Aussie soldiers chose to shoot their Japanese military prisoners instead of giving them the protections afforded POWs under international agreements.
If I'd been an Allied/Aussie soldier and knew among the Jp prisoners were those who'd killed and cannibalised non Jp soldiers, or murdered hospital patients and staff. I'd have put a bullet or two in them.These Jp prisoners' deaths were humane compared to what happened to their enemies.
As for Roosevelt allowing the Japanese POWs to be sent to Russia - same thing again. The rights of the Japanese Imperial forces were the last thing on Allied minds. At least the Nazis didn't bullshit about their crimes but became more and more open about what they intended to do and what they did.
you harbored excessive expectations towards japan, came to this island and experienced the taste of racism(, which is far more mild than ones of the western societies, though) for the first time in your life and now you are getting to harbor hostile feelings against the whole of japan and japanese. and also you are sympathizing with china/korea by the "logic" of the enemy of your enemy is your friend.
and you need to google hasty generalization or the fallacy of composition.
the fact that some of j-soldiers were evil and no mercy never follows the conclusion that all or most of j-soldiers too were evil and no mercy and then totally no problem to ruthlessly treat them as worms. its no more than a propaganda scattered by the western medias at that time that all or most of j-soldiers were savage and cruel as devils, needless to say.
i guess you are at the age of mid 20s. its still too young to solve your worries by yourself alone.
if you speak japanese to some extent, i recommend you to try this without hesitation.
http://www.tbs.co.jp/radio/kodomotel/archive.htm
good luck
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests