Samurai_Jerk wrote:wagyl wrote:1) the use of non-British vocabulary "cellphone" in a British newspaper
I agree with your basic premise but this isn't really evidence of anything as news organizations use stories written by people of a lot of different nationalities.
Actually, it is a sign of declining standards, or standardization, to be more accurate.
One of the traditional layers of editing in journalism was standardization (known more commonly as style), but it has essentially fallen by the wayside in favor of click bait, speed and apologies if someone notices when you've got something wrong. It's just one more area where traditional journalist practices have ended.
I would also take contemporary journalism with a very fine pinch of salt. People on the ground are likely to upload things onto the net in their raw form, they have no vested interests to serve (and I don't know of a journalist without vested interests, even if they're only for their own self-satisfaction) and it should be easier to judge for yourself what's going on without being fed (Having said that, I'm notoriously naive and probably fail in this area) an opinion someone else wants you to have.
I strongly advise anyone to refrain from trusting any entrenched media organization, anywhere.