Hot Topics | |
---|---|
GomiGirl wrote:Hey wait - are you going to invite me or am I still on your shit list for the golden gai thing...
kamome wrote:you can just hang out with Guyjean and me and discuss gender bias and other social ills over beers in Shibuya....
kamome wrote:Once you're on the shit list, there's no way off of it.
Just kidding....but we'd have to ask Guy about it first.
GomiGirl wrote:Hey wait - are you going to invite me or am I still on your shit list for the golden gai thing...
GomiGirl wrote:Hey wait - are you going to invite me or am I still on your shit list for the golden gai thing...
Taro Toporific wrote:GomiGirl wrote:Hey wait - are you going to invite me or am I still on your shit list for the golden gai thing...
Hey, do you guys need adult supervision?
American Oyaji wrote:GomiGirl wrote:Hey wait - are you going to invite me or am I still on your shit list for the golden gai thing...
What happened in the Golden Gai?
hanabi wrote:ramchop, you're right it is a very small sample size and I'm not convinced that those differences in your children have *absolutely nothing* to do with how people treat them, how they were raised and what they've observed from the people around them rather than *pure nature* alone.
ramchop wrote:Or is it only parents who have an influence in the whole nuture debate?
GuyJean wrote:Right about now, a frosty cold one sounds mighty good. Unfortunately, this week, I'm slammed.. :(
hanabi wrote:Of course, I don't think so. I thought I made that clear with "what they've observed from the people around them."
I'm editing this to try to sound less bitchy. But it isn't working. There's just no convincing me, short of straight and unbiased scientific facts.
ramchop wrote:And just how many FGs can you cram into one of those tiny Golden Gai bars?
cstaylor wrote:Not true.Captain Japan wrote:Heck, I don't think anyone's even thrown up.
ramchop wrote:And there are no straight and unbiased scientific facts on this issue. It's one of the murkier sciences.
So what are you basing your assertations on, scientific facts or what you want to believe?
hanabi wrote:And...uh...um...I'd finish this post, but I forgot what this thread was about.
See how much I need a drink?
kamome wrote:P.S. There have been other Golden Gai events???? And still no invite??? I'm beginning to smell a conspiracy
Japan is likely to sink deeper into stagnation unless society can change in a way that makes it easier for women to play a greater role by capitalizing on their abilities. This problem is highlighted every year by Japan's abysmal positions in the international rankings of gender equality.
This year, Japan was ranked 94th of 134 countries in the Global Gender Gap Index (GGGI), compiled by the World Economic Forum, a Geneva-based nonprofit foundation best known for its annual meeting in Davos, Switzerland, that brings together business and political leaders from around the world. The index is based on such criteria as the ratios of men and women among members of parliament and corporate executives, and in wages.
Similarly last year, Japan ranked 57th among 109 countries in the United Nations' Gender Empowerment Measure, which measures women's standing in political and economic areas in a country.
However, Japan did take the 12th position among 138 nations in the rankings of the Gender Inequality Index, a measure of inequality in achievements between men and women introduced this year by the United Nations. The higher the ranking, the lower the inequality.
But Japan's relatively good performance was due to higher weight given to such criteria as maternal mortality.
This may make some Japanese breathe a sigh of relief. But the fact that the achievements of Japanese women in society are rated low despite their high marks for health and longevity underscores serious problems with Japanese society...
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests