Hot Topics | |
---|---|
Gaisaradatsuraku! wrote:The time is now for all free nations to stand shoulder to shoulder with us and help actively defeat this enemy or forever be branded as cowards.
ramchop wrote:Gaisaradatsuraku! wrote:The time is now for all free nations to stand shoulder to shoulder with us and help actively defeat this enemy or forever be branded as cowards.
So Bush is forever branding a big chunk of the free world as cowards? What a prick!
Even if the tin-pot dictators of the world were excluded from the UN and there was no veto, I still doubt that Bush/Blair would have the numbers to win a vote.
I don't think the reasons put forward for war are sound. However, Saddam is an evil fucker and I truely hope that in this case the ends justifies the means.
Marvin wrote:Bush is an asshole, but it was a great speech.
I hope the U.S. (and Aussies!) give Saddam a Ba'ath...they oughta beat the Shiite out of him.
Any bets on how many hours before Iraq surrenders once the attack begins?
Gaisaradatsuraku wrote:Stand up for something for once in your life. The straglers are no more than cowards and traitors to progress. The end is now for dictators such as Saddam. More to follow. The first chapter of post Berlin Wall history is being written.
Gaisaradatsuraku! wrote:Bush is not an asshole.
Gaisaradatsuraku! wrote:Clinton is an asshole. A power grabbing, pants dropping Arkie with no sense of dignity..
ramchop wrote:Gaisaradatsuraku wrote:Stand up for something for once in your life. The straglers are no more than cowards and traitors to progress. The end is now for dictators such as Saddam. More to follow. The first chapter of post Berlin Wall history is being written.
Bollocks!
The stragglers are not cowards. They're certainly not refraining from joining the US action for fear of Saddam's army. There's no question that Iraq's military will fold and fold quite quickly.
The stragglers are traitors to progress? Saddam may have been toying with the weapons inspectors but it was pretty obvious that the inspections were getting somewhere. Most of the "evidence" of banned weapons was flimsy and a some of it was even forged.
Bush's attitude is very very clear. "Fuck the world. I know what's best".
I'm quite clear in my position. War is not justified now. I'm still allowed to hope that the outcome is not disasterous (and it could be). The outcome could have many positive effects. It'll certainly shake up the UN.
GuyJean wrote:Gaisaradatsuraku! wrote:Bush is not an asshole.
I agree. He's a spoiled oil-boy with no ability to communicate beyond his peers.. I guess a silver-spooned redneck is better than an asshole..Gaisaradatsuraku! wrote:Clinton is an asshole. A power grabbing, pants dropping Arkie with no sense of dignity..
.. Um, yeah.. I think you got the pants dropping right.. And who really cares about dignity when it was himself and his family that he damaged? (Unless you were dating him) You don't think Bush/Cheney are power grabbing?
I'm surprised you hold Reaga.. I mean, baby Bush in such high regard. He's done NOTHING on his own. Colin Powell is self-made, as was/is Clinton. I have SO much more respect for people like that, IMO.
I thought Bush sounded decent today.. He read his speech well.![]()
GJ
Gaisaradatsuraku! wrote:Your country like most countries falls to its knees in front of terrorism and fascism. If you can't fight in a unified manner with your allies then you are the enemy as well.
ramchop wrote:Gaisaradatsuraku! wrote:Your country like most countries falls to its knees in front of terrorism and fascism. If you can't fight in a unified manner with your allies then you are the enemy as well.
What an astounding amount of shit you speak.
I can think of one when a foreign lead act of terrorism occurred in my country. Nothing major, only one casualty. The bastards were caught and locked up. (then handed back to their paymasters where they were given an award, but we won't go into that)
As for fascism, we were well into WWII before America became involved.
Fight unquestioning alongside your allies? Remember Vietnam? Yes that was a justified war.Shameful that we sent troops to help on that occassion, but at least our soldiers fought willingly and weren't made into slaves by a repugnant draft system.
Just why the fuck shouldn't we question the actions and motives of our all-powerful allies?
GuyJean wrote:Gaisaradatsuraku! wrote:Bush is not an asshole.
I agree. He's a spoiled oil-boy with no ability to communicate beyond his peers.. I guess a silver-spooned redneck is better than an asshole..Gaisaradatsuraku! wrote:Clinton is an asshole. A power grabbing, pants dropping Arkie with no sense of dignity..
.. Um, yeah.. I think you got the pants dropping right.. And who really cares about dignity when it was himself and his family that he damaged? (Unless you were dating him) You don't think Bush/Cheney are power grabbing?
I'm surprised you hold Reaga.. I mean, baby Bush in such high regard. He's done NOTHING on his own. Colin Powell is self-made, as was/is Clinton. I have SO much more respect for people like that, IMO.
I thought Bush sounded decent today.. He read his speech well.![]()
GJ
Gaisaradatsuraku! wrote:Because you are a dumb ass Australian and can't think for yourself.
GomiGirl wrote:GuyJean wrote:Gaisaradatsuraku! wrote:Bush is not an asshole.
I agree. He's a spoiled oil-boy with no ability to communicate beyond his peers.. I guess a silver-spooned redneck is better than an asshole..Gaisaradatsuraku! wrote:Clinton is an asshole. A power grabbing, pants dropping Arkie with no sense of dignity..
.. Um, yeah.. I think you got the pants dropping right.. And who really cares about dignity when it was himself and his family that he damaged? (Unless you were dating him) You don't think Bush/Cheney are power grabbing?
I'm surprised you hold Reaga.. I mean, baby Bush in such high regard. He's done NOTHING on his own. Colin Powell is self-made, as was/is Clinton. I have SO much more respect for people like that, IMO.
I thought Bush sounded decent today.. He read his speech well.![]()
GJ
Absolutely agree with you on all points..
I watched the speech reading this morning waiting desperately for some nugget that would enlighten me to a justifiable reason for this invasion.. I was left unsatisfied. Just the same tired old lines of good versus evil crap that may have worked during the middle ages to an uneducated populice but doesn't hold water today. In a strange way, I want to agree but I will not just do so because I am told to without any explanation. That smacks of dictatorship.
Threats of "you are with us or against us" make my blood boil. Democracy is supposed to allow for people to think freely for themselves and make up their own minds and act accordingly. This is Mcarthy-ism all over again.
I was watching an interesting documentary the other night on the recent quiet actions of OPEC in Austria. Every country had a page giving information on the delegates with their photos. Iraq, one of the largest oil producing countries, had no photo and three lines, as if a regime change had already occured. It was also interesting that Iraqi opposition leaders currently in exile in Europe have been invited for the first time to the "big" table for the OPEC talks and behind closed doors they have been invited to talks with the US delegates. This was most suprising to the Iraqi opposition leaders as they have never had this type of attention before. So this is not about oil huh?
ramchop wrote:Gaisaradatsuraku! wrote:Because you are a dumb ass Australian and can't think for yourself.
Yes, who needs to think for yourself when America can do all the thinking for you? Is that your definition of "freedom"? :P
" wrote:Gaisaradatsuraku wrote:The stragglers are traitors to progress? Saddam may have been toying with the weapons inspectors but it was pretty obvious that the inspections were getting somewhere. Most of the "evidence" of banned weapons was flimsy and a some of it was even forged.
Gaisaradatsuraku! wrote:Where do you get this nonsense
Most damaging of all, the inspectors made progress and did not find any of the weapons of mass destruction the dossiers had said were there.
Gaisaradatsuraku! wrote:I tell you what sweetie pie. Do you want to learn about tyranny and McCarthyism first hand. Why don't you get your fucking ass on a plane and go to the Middle East and learn a little about what life would be like if it weren't for countries with backbone. They will teach you exactly what you are worth which is nothing. Thank your lucky little stars that a country like America exists. You are so fucking stupid to even think that Saddam represents an alternative. You are so fucking naive to think that this man deserves even the chance to live. You are a dingbat.
And on your way back why don't you get me a god damn beer honey and make yourself useful for once.
Because your contingent was so small you didn't need a draft in spite of the fact that this war was occurring in your back yard.
Once again big brother to the rescue.
ramchop wrote:Gaisaradatsuraku! wrote:Where do you get this nonsense
HereMost damaging of all, the inspectors made progress and did not find any of the weapons of mass destruction the dossiers had said were there.
GomiGirl wrote:Gaisaradatsuraku! wrote:I tell you what sweetie pie. Do you want to learn about tyranny and McCarthyism first hand. Why don't you get your fucking ass on a plane and go to the Middle East and learn a little about what life would be like if it weren't for countries with backbone. They will teach you exactly what you are worth which is nothing. Thank your lucky little stars that a country like America exists. You are so fucking stupid to even think that Saddam represents an alternative. You are so fucking naive to think that this man deserves even the chance to live. You are a dingbat.
And on your way back why don't you get me a god damn beer honey and make yourself useful for once.
You haven't been laid in a really long time have you?
I believe that freedom not only gives me the right to question the actions of leadership, but it is actually the duty of free citizens to question so to protect liberty.
I don't have the name of any political party tattooed on my ass, I will listen to anybody that steps up to speak to offer leadership. But I will not agree just because they are the leader.
Marvin wrote:ramchop, you're an Aussie?
I thought you were a Kiwi...I'm sure you're a Kiwi, with the references to the French terrorists, the sheep avatar and all.
Actually, Big Brother was going in to save France's arse, after it lost a colonial war in Vietnam. Big Brother then got himself in the shit. Australia/New Zealand sent advisers upon the request of President Kennedy and combat troops after being asked by President Johnson. It wasn't like Big Bro coming to the rescue, but you had some real fighters beside you to show you how to get it done properly!
Marvin wrote:Once again big brother to the rescue.
Actually, Big Brother was going in to save France's arse, after it lost a colonial war in Vietnam. Big Brother then got himself in the shit. Australia/New Zealand sent advisers upon the request of President Kennedy and combat troops after being asked by President Johnson. It wasn't like Big Bro coming to the rescue, but you had some real fighters beside you to show you how to get it done properly!
P.S. I still think Bush is an asshole, but I'd take a cigar off him before I took one from Slick Willy.
Marvin wrote:Gaisara,
Tone down the personal attacks a bit, heh.
Everyone's entitled to an opinion even if it differs from your own. I, and plenty of others less verbal, agree with the U.S. attack on Iraq, but we've also got to admit there are a hell of a lot of others out there who don't.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests