Kyodo News wrote:NEWS ADVISORY: Radioactive iodine 7.5 mil. times legal limit found in seawater near No. 2 reactor

http://english.kyodonews.jp/news/
Hot Topics | |
---|---|
Kyodo News wrote:NEWS ADVISORY: Radioactive iodine 7.5 mil. times legal limit found in seawater near No. 2 reactor
Kyodo News wrote:
2 held for selling unauthorized drug over radioactive contamination
One of the two is Fumitaka Umewaka, 50, a Kobe-based health food dealer, who is suspected of violating the pharmaceutical affairs law. Umewaka said on a promotional website that the drug absorbs radioactive substances and removes them from the human body, the police said.
Taro Toporific wrote:Speaking of culling: How about the worthlessness of Japan's rape-the-ocean fisherman?
Now is the perfect time to cull their ranks and let Japan's fish stocks to finally recover from decades of overfishing./Has anybody tried to go fishing here?
//The only fish you can catch is the size of bait.
Taro Toporific wrote:Cull the herds in a 100km radius and then pay those welfare collecting tax-cheaters for their livestock only if they leave farming for good.
Taro Toporific wrote:Speaking of culling: How about the worthlessness of Japan's rape-the-ocean fisherman?
Now is the perfect time to cull their ranks and let Japan's fish stocks to finally recover from decades of overfishing.
Taro Toporific wrote:/Has anybody tried to go fishing here?
//The only fish you can catch is the size of bait.![]()
Over the last fortnight I've made a deeply troubling discovery. The anti-nuclear movement to which I once belonged has misled the world about the impacts of radiation on human health. The claims we have made are ungrounded in science, unsupportable when challenged, and wildly wrong. We have done other people, and ourselves, a terrible disservice...more...
Kanchou wrote:If it wasn't for the thousands of inefficient small-scale rice farmers, Japan would probably have quite a bit more living space for people. Bigger houses, wider roads, and YARDS.
Fill in the tanpo and make parking lots, buy up large areas of land and farm them large-scale.
Oh, and more reasonably-priced rice that can compete with foreign imports would be great.
cstaylor wrote:I think JA and whatever the fisherman's union is called are holding out for the Jimento to retake control of the central government.
Acknowledging the toll the unrelenting nuclear crisis has had on people's lives and livelihoods, the owner of the stricken nuclear plant has offered money to some of those in the radiation's reach -- an offer that one city decided to refuse.
An official with the Tokyo Electric Power Company, which operates the Fukushima Daiichi power plant, said Tuesday that the utility made a "token" offer to residents in 10 communities near the plant.
Starting March 31, money began going out to those in nine of them. But the town of Namie rejected Tokyo Electric's offer, with a local official calling it a too meager attempt to make up for a drastically reduced quality of life and income.
Tokyo Electric didn't detail how much money is being offered to each community. But Kousei Negishi, who is the manager of general affairs for Namie, said that it was 20 million yen ($238,000). That works out to about $12 for each of Namie's roughly 20,000 residents.
That amount of cash, said Negishi, is "not enough."...
Mike Oxlong wrote:Town near nuclear plant rejects Japanese utility's 'token' offer
$12, or 100 Umaibos.That works out to about $12 for each of Namie's roughly 20,000 residents.
Mulboyne wrote:Environmental activist George Monbiot has angered some of his erstwhile colleagues by questioning whether nuclear power really poses high risks. This is one response:
Why George Monbiot is wrong on nuclear power
Monbiot has now written this article about radiation risks:
George Monbiot: The unpalatable truth is that the anti-nuclear lobby has misled us all
On another matter:
Fukushima Radiation: Modeling Shows Limited Spread in Ocean
Mulboyne wrote:Environmental activist George Monbiot has angered some of his erstwhile colleagues by questioning whether nuclear power really poses high risks.
Greji wrote:Kan is quickly establishing new records for unpopularity and nose-diving polls, while dragging the DPJ along with him. Your "retake control" by the "good ole boys" might not be as far away as you think!
omae mona wrote:I'm finding it hard to side with the anti-nuclear faction when their starting point for debate is fiction rather than fact. There must be some valid arguments on their side, but I am not hearing them argued very well.
Johnson wrote:Even if power plants would be 100% safe - we don't even have facilities to store the nuclear waste. We're producing shitloads of material that will be dangerous for thousands of years and the current procedure to deal with that stuff is to throw it in a deep hole. How's that for a valid argument.
Mulboyne wrote:Monbiot has now written this article about radiation risks:
George Monbiot: The unpalatable truth is that the anti-nuclear lobby has misled us all
omae mona wrote:This resonates with me.
A radiation monitor at the troubled Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant says workers there are exposed to immeasurable levels of radiation.
The monitor told NHK that no one can enter the plant's No. 1 through 3 reactor buildings because radiation levels are so high that monitoring devices have been rendered useless. He said even levels outside the buildings exceed 100 millisieverts in some places.
Pools and streams of water contaminated by high-level radiation are being found throughout the facility.
The monitor said he takes measurements as soon as he finds water, because he can't determine whether it's contaminated just by looking at it. He said he's very worried about the safety of workers there.
Contaminated water and efforts to remove it have been hampering much-needed work to cool the reactors.
The monitor expressed frustration, likening the situation to looking up a mountain that one has to climb, without having taken a step up.
Tuesday, April 05, 2011
omae mona wrote:I ain't gonna jump in to defend TEPCO here, but what exactly is the "inconvenience" that residents of Namie suffered? I got lots of inconvenience too here in Tokyo.. ..
SK is starting to lose its patience, not surprisingly as this is probably only the start of TEPCO's excorcism of the plant's contaminated water.CrankyBastard wrote:I'm wondering how long it'll be before the whole world gets really pissed off at Japan for crapping in its own backyard and shoveling the shit into the ocean to share with everyone.
Yokohammer wrote:Radiation levels exceeding the "stay indoors" level. Higher than Iidate-mura, even.
Contaminated soil that will make the town's produce unsellable (whether the danger is real or imagined by the consumer doesn't really matter). Basically the same as everyone else in the contaminated areas.
All this "there's no scientifically proven danger" talk is fine, but the fact is the poor people are terrified. They are terrified on a daily basis, with no end in sight. They aren't scientists, they're basic townsfolk fearing for their lives and futures, and those of their children. Their viewpoint is valid too: if there's a need to evacuate or stay indoors, there must be a danger. And that's just the psychological impact. The economic impact is very real too. Tepco's response is just unacceptable. "Here's 1,000 yen to allay your mortal fear, now go away and leave us alone." I don't think so.
EDIT: In this morning's news, apparently the government has ordered TEPCO to pay each evacuee household an initial sum of around 1,000,000 yen to tide them over until full compensation can be decided upon.
Return to Earthquakes, Tsunamis, Nukes, and other Catastrophes
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests