Home | Forums | Mark forums read | Search | FAQ | Login

Advanced search
Hot Topics
Buraku hot topic MARS...Let's Go!
Buraku hot topic Steven Seagal? Who's that?
Buraku hot topic Japanese Can't Handle Being Fucked In Paris
Buraku hot topic If they'll elect a black POTUS, why not Japanese?
Buraku hot topic "Unthinkable as a female pope in Rome"
Buraku hot topic Hollywood To Adapt "Death Note"
Buraku hot topic Post your 'You Tube' videos of interest.
Buraku hot topic Is anything real here?
Buraku hot topic There'll be fewer cows getting off that Qantas flight
Taka-Okami hot topic Your gonna be Rich: a rising Yen
Change font size
  • fuckedgaijin ‹ General ‹ F*cked News ‹ Earthquakes, Tsunamis, Nukes, and other Catastrophes

Tohoku Earthquake, Tsunami and Nuclear Disaster!!!

Post a reply
4454 posts • Page 58 of 149 • 1 ... 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61 ... 149

Wow, that's pretty high

Postby cstaylor » Tue Apr 05, 2011 2:22 pm

Kyodo News wrote:NEWS ADVISORY: Radioactive iodine 7.5 mil. times legal limit found in seawater near No. 2 reactor


:glow2:

http://english.kyodonews.jp/news/
User avatar
cstaylor
 
Posts: 6383
Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2002 2:07 am
Location: Yokohama, Japan
  • Website
Top

I'm glad they're cracking down on this opportunism

Postby cstaylor » Tue Apr 05, 2011 3:19 pm

Kyodo News wrote:
2 held for selling unauthorized drug over radioactive contamination

One of the two is Fumitaka Umewaka, 50, a Kobe-based health food dealer, who is suspected of violating the pharmaceutical affairs law. Umewaka said on a promotional website that the drug absorbs radioactive substances and removes them from the human body, the police said.


:noose:

http://english.kyodonews.jp/news/2011/04/83230.html
User avatar
cstaylor
 
Posts: 6383
Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2002 2:07 am
Location: Yokohama, Japan
  • Website
Top

Postby matsuki » Tue Apr 05, 2011 3:27 pm

Taro Toporific wrote:Speaking of culling: How about the worthlessness of Japan's rape-the-ocean fisherman?
Now is the perfect time to cull their ranks and let Japan's fish stocks to finally recover from decades of overfishing.
/Has anybody tried to go fishing here?
//The only fish you can catch is the size of bait. :-?


THIS

Mercury levels in the meat weren't enough, I wonder if the increased radiation will cull demand for seafood long enough to let the ocean recover some.
User avatar
matsuki
 
Posts: 16045
Joined: Wed Feb 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Location: All Aisu deserves a good bukkake
Top

Postby FG Lurker » Tue Apr 05, 2011 4:30 pm

Taro Toporific wrote:Cull the herds in a 100km radius and then pay those welfare collecting tax-cheaters for their livestock only if they leave farming for good.

:thumbs: The farming subsidies here really need to be reworked.

Taro Toporific wrote:Speaking of culling: How about the worthlessness of Japan's rape-the-ocean fisherman?
Now is the perfect time to cull their ranks and let Japan's fish stocks to finally recover from decades of overfishing.

I started a reply that stated much the same thing but ended up deleting it as I figured I'd end up getting accused of trying to minimize or trivialize the situation.

The fisherman's union (or whatever it is called) is unbelievably strong here, it's absolutely insane. Want to have a dock (with pilings)? Pay the fisherman's union. Kansai Airport? Still paying a huge amount every year for the right to use the water area it takes up.

The way crabbing and clamming are done here drive me absolutely apeshit. Either there are no size limits or they get blatantly ignored. Not surprising that there are nearly no crabs left when they take small crab, female crab, pregnant female crab -- anything they can get a hold of. :evil:

Taro Toporific wrote:/Has anybody tried to go fishing here?
//The only fish you can catch is the size of bait. :-?

Nah, you just need to go to the lakes or rivers where invasive foreign species have been purposely introduced and are now taking over the native ecosystems. :evil:
And you run and you run to catch up with the sun but it's sinking
Racing around to come up behind you again
The sun is the same in a relative way, but you're older
Shorter of breath and one day closer to death
User avatar
FG Lurker
 
Posts: 7854
Joined: Mon Nov 29, 2004 6:16 pm
Location: On the run
Top

Postby Mulboyne » Tue Apr 05, 2011 4:51 pm

Environmental activist George Monbiot has angered some of his erstwhile colleagues by questioning whether nuclear power really poses high risks. This is one response:

Why George Monbiot is wrong on nuclear power

Monbiot has now written this article about radiation risks:

George Monbiot: The unpalatable truth is that the anti-nuclear lobby has misled us all
Over the last fortnight I've made a deeply troubling discovery. The anti-nuclear movement to which I once belonged has misled the world about the impacts of radiation on human health. The claims we have made are ungrounded in science, unsupportable when challenged, and wildly wrong. We have done other people, and ourselves, a terrible disservice...more...


On another matter:

Fukushima Radiation: Modeling Shows Limited Spread in Ocean
User avatar
Mulboyne
 
Posts: 18608
Joined: Thu May 06, 2004 1:39 pm
Location: London
Top

Postby Kanchou » Tue Apr 05, 2011 5:01 pm

If it wasn't for the thousands of inefficient small-scale rice farmers, Japan would probably have quite a bit more living space for people. Bigger houses, wider roads, and YARDS.

Fill in the tanpo and make parking lots, buy up large areas of land and farm them large-scale.

Oh, and more reasonably-priced rice that can compete with foreign imports would be great.
THE RADIOACTIVE FG!
Kanchou
Maezumo
 
Posts: 1290
Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2003 8:03 am
Location: Fuc'kedashima
Top

Postby cstaylor » Tue Apr 05, 2011 5:08 pm

Kanchou wrote:If it wasn't for the thousands of inefficient small-scale rice farmers, Japan would probably have quite a bit more living space for people. Bigger houses, wider roads, and YARDS.

Fill in the tanpo and make parking lots, buy up large areas of land and farm them large-scale.

Oh, and more reasonably-priced rice that can compete with foreign imports would be great.


Japan would need another stunning DPJ victory for that to happen. I think JA and whatever the fisherman's union is called are holding out for the Jimento to retake control of the central government.
User avatar
cstaylor
 
Posts: 6383
Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2002 2:07 am
Location: Yokohama, Japan
  • Website
Top

Postby Greji » Tue Apr 05, 2011 5:31 pm

cstaylor wrote:I think JA and whatever the fisherman's union is called are holding out for the Jimento to retake control of the central government.


Kan is quickly establishing new records for unpopularity and nose-diving polls, while dragging the DPJ along with him. Your "retake control" by the "good ole boys" might not be as far away as you think!
:cool:
"There are those that learn by reading. Then a few who learn by observation. The rest have to piss on an electric fence and find out for themselves!"- Will Rogers
:kanpai:
User avatar
Greji
 
Posts: 14357
Joined: Fri Jun 25, 2004 3:00 pm
Location: Yoshiwara
Top

Postby Mike Oxlong » Tue Apr 05, 2011 6:12 pm

Image
MOJ extends period of stay for foreigners in affected areas...
•I prefer liberty with danger to peace with slavery.•
User avatar
Mike Oxlong
 
Posts: 6818
Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2004 5:47 pm
Location: 古き良き日本
Top

Postby Mike Oxlong » Tue Apr 05, 2011 6:42 pm

Town near nuclear plant rejects Japanese utility's 'token' offer
Acknowledging the toll the unrelenting nuclear crisis has had on people's lives and livelihoods, the owner of the stricken nuclear plant has offered money to some of those in the radiation's reach -- an offer that one city decided to refuse.

An official with the Tokyo Electric Power Company, which operates the Fukushima Daiichi power plant, said Tuesday that the utility made a "token" offer to residents in 10 communities near the plant.

Starting March 31, money began going out to those in nine of them. But the town of Namie rejected Tokyo Electric's offer, with a local official calling it a too meager attempt to make up for a drastically reduced quality of life and income.

Tokyo Electric didn't detail how much money is being offered to each community. But Kousei Negishi, who is the manager of general affairs for Namie, said that it was 20 million yen ($238,000). That works out to about $12 for each of Namie's roughly 20,000 residents.

That amount of cash, said Negishi, is "not enough."...
•I prefer liberty with danger to peace with slavery.•
User avatar
Mike Oxlong
 
Posts: 6818
Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2004 5:47 pm
Location: 古き良き日本
Top

Postby Yokohammer » Tue Apr 05, 2011 7:42 pm

Mike Oxlong wrote:Town near nuclear plant rejects Japanese utility's 'token' offer

This is such a farce.
TEPCO trying to preempt further liability by offering 1,000 yen per person.

Beyond belief. I'm usually able to vent my feelings about such issues at length, but TEPCO's insensitivity leaves me speechless. Almost. Contemptuous bastards.
_/_/_/ Phmeh ... _/_/_/
User avatar
Yokohammer
 
Posts: 5090
Joined: Tue Sep 30, 2008 6:41 pm
Location: South of Sendai
Top

Postby Doctor Stop » Tue Apr 05, 2011 8:17 pm

That works out to about $12 for each of Namie's roughly 20,000 residents.
$12, or 100 Umaibos.
User avatar
Doctor Stop
Maezumo
 
Posts: 1837
Joined: Tue Jan 16, 2007 10:12 pm
Location: Up Shit Creek Somewhere
Top

Postby CrankyBastard » Tue Apr 05, 2011 8:25 pm

I'm wondering how long it'll be before the whole world gets really pissed off at Japan for crapping in its own backyard and shoveling the shit into the ocean to share with everyone.
:(
The web is spun,
The net's been cast.
You are the prey,
Watch your ass!
User avatar
CrankyBastard
Maezumo
 
Posts: 1267
Joined: Mon Jul 03, 2006 12:10 pm
Location: Edge of the Bay
Top

Postby omae mona » Tue Apr 05, 2011 8:56 pm

I ain't gonna jump in to defend TEPCO here, but what exactly is the "inconvenience" that residents of Namie suffered? I got lots of inconvenience too here in Tokyo.. ..
User avatar
omae mona
 
Posts: 3184
Joined: Mon Aug 18, 2003 12:08 pm
Top

Postby Typhoon » Tue Apr 05, 2011 9:16 pm

Mulboyne wrote:Environmental activist George Monbiot has angered some of his erstwhile colleagues by questioning whether nuclear power really poses high risks. This is one response:

Why George Monbiot is wrong on nuclear power

Monbiot has now written this article about radiation risks:

George Monbiot: The unpalatable truth is that the anti-nuclear lobby has misled us all

On another matter:

Fukushima Radiation: Modeling Shows Limited Spread in Ocean


The Bhopal chemical disaster killed far more people than Chernobyl yet the anti nuke zealots continue to use plastics.
Never criticize anyone until you've walked several kilometres in their shoes.
Because

1. You're now several kilometres away; and

2. You've got their shoes.
User avatar
Typhoon
Maezumo
 
Posts: 778
Joined: Mon Dec 12, 2005 6:26 am
Top

Postby Kanchou » Tue Apr 05, 2011 9:28 pm

Mike Oxlong wrote:Image
MOJ extends period of stay for foreigners in affected areas...


Didn't some Chinese guy get nabbed for trying to leave the country while overstaying?
THE RADIOACTIVE FG!
Kanchou
Maezumo
 
Posts: 1290
Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2003 8:03 am
Location: Fuc'kedashima
Top

Postby omae mona » Tue Apr 05, 2011 9:54 pm

Mulboyne wrote:Environmental activist George Monbiot has angered some of his erstwhile colleagues by questioning whether nuclear power really poses high risks.


This resonates with me. Before Fukushima, I was not at all interested in the pro-nuclear versus anti-nuclear debate. I really held no opinion at all, as I've never had time to pay attention to it or educate myself on the details. In the back of my mind, I think I had a gut feeling that I would come down strongly on the anti-nuclear side of the fence if I actually read up on the issues. This seemed to be a case of environmentalists versus big evil industrialists, and I have a tendency side with environmentalists.

But as the events of Fukushima unfolded and I started reading commentary on the Internet, I was really taken aback. I am not sure if the message board rants of individuals or the op-ed pieces I've seen from advocates are representative of the overall anti-nuclear movement or not. But what I witnessed are a bunch of science-denying hysterics on the anti-nuclear side, versus people who seemed to grasp science, grasp logic, and have perspective about pros and cons on the pro-nuclear side. I'm finding it hard to side with the anti-nuclear faction when their starting point for debate is fiction rather than fact. There must be some valid arguments on their side, but I am not hearing them argued very well.
User avatar
omae mona
 
Posts: 3184
Joined: Mon Aug 18, 2003 12:08 pm
Top

Postby legion » Tue Apr 05, 2011 9:55 pm

Greji wrote:Kan is quickly establishing new records for unpopularity and nose-diving polls, while dragging the DPJ along with him. Your "retake control" by the "good ole boys" might not be as far away as you think!
:cool:


Could there be a connection? The tame media and the old guard.

I always feel sorry for the PMs of Japan, they get selected by a group of people who are just waiting for the chance to stab them in the back.
User avatar
legion
Maezumo
 
Posts: 2681
Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2010 11:30 pm
Location: Tokyo
  • Website
Top

Postby Johnson » Tue Apr 05, 2011 11:02 pm

omae mona wrote:I'm finding it hard to side with the anti-nuclear faction when their starting point for debate is fiction rather than fact. There must be some valid arguments on their side, but I am not hearing them argued very well.

Even if power plants would be 100% safe - we don't even have facilities to store the nuclear waste. We're producing shitloads of material that will be dangerous for thousands of years and the current procedure to deal with that stuff is to throw it in a deep hole. How's that for a valid argument.
Johnson
Maezumo
 
Posts: 5
Joined: Sat Nov 15, 2008 1:52 pm
Top

Postby Kanchou » Tue Apr 05, 2011 11:03 pm

For everyone who dies of cancer from Fukushima there will probably be 10,000 coal miners killed every year.

FWIW.
THE RADIOACTIVE FG!
Kanchou
Maezumo
 
Posts: 1290
Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2003 8:03 am
Location: Fuc'kedashima
Top

Postby omae mona » Wed Apr 06, 2011 12:06 am

Johnson wrote:Even if power plants would be 100% safe - we don't even have facilities to store the nuclear waste. We're producing shitloads of material that will be dangerous for thousands of years and the current procedure to deal with that stuff is to throw it in a deep hole. How's that for a valid argument.


Honestly, I don't know much about this yet and I am trying to be open minded. But the validity of your argument depends completely on the definitions of the words you're using. Here are my questions:
  1. How much is "shitloads"?
  2. Define "dangerous". What are the risks?
  3. What is the problem with throwing it in a deep hole?

Your argument uses lots of words that create an emotional reaction and sound scary. But I can't evaluate it until you give me factual information. I am not even skeptical; I've seen mention of nuclear waste as a concern, and gee, it sounds to dumb old me like it could be a serious problem. But if it is, clearly there must be some scientific fact to back that up.
User avatar
omae mona
 
Posts: 3184
Joined: Mon Aug 18, 2003 12:08 pm
Top

Postby damn name » Wed Apr 06, 2011 12:29 am

Mulboyne wrote:Monbiot has now written this article about radiation risks:

George Monbiot: The unpalatable truth is that the anti-nuclear lobby has misled us all


Controversy about radiation effects usually revolve around the dreaded linear no-threshold (LNT) model - the model that says if a lot of radiation is a lot bad, then a little radiation must be a little bad. It's implanted into the public psyche as something obvious and a scientific fact.

Critics of the model have some ammunition though. They are able to say that it's unproven theory. There is no data or evidence to support it. In fact, there is evidence to disprove it. A famous one is "Mortality of A-bomb Survivors in Nagasaki and Hiroshima" that showed persons with exposure to non-lethal levels of radiation exhibited lower mortality from non-cancerous disease than persons with no exposure.

Some exposure created a very small increase in cancer rates (on the scale that if the probability of you getting cancer in your lifetime was 20%, it increased to about 20.1%), but non-cancerous diseases (heart, circulatory, respiratory, etc.) declined so much that the net effect was that people with some exposure have lived longer than people with no exposure. http://probeinternational.org/library/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/MineIR10-JpSurvMort1.pdf
damn name
Maezumo
 
Posts: 194
Joined: Tue Mar 15, 2011 7:58 pm
Top

Postby Mulboyne » Wed Apr 06, 2011 12:35 am

omae mona wrote:This resonates with me.


Monbiot features in this TV clip along with Caldicott. It's what inspired him to look closer into her allegations. In a tweet, he calls it a "mind-blowing TV discussion with Helen Caldicott about radiation. Her claims became ever wilder and less credible".
User avatar
Mulboyne
 
Posts: 18608
Joined: Thu May 06, 2004 1:39 pm
Location: London
Top

'Catastrophic water dump means Fukushima really out of contr

Postby Thug4Life » Wed Apr 06, 2011 1:34 am



:/
User avatar
Thug4Life
Maezumo
 
Posts: 120
Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2011 2:53 pm
Location: HANGZHOU
Top

Postby Mulboyne » Wed Apr 06, 2011 2:35 am

The national government and local authorities have a number of accounts on Twitter. Digital Garage has come up with a menu to help find them:

http://twinavi.jp/gov
User avatar
Mulboyne
 
Posts: 18608
Joined: Thu May 06, 2004 1:39 pm
Location: London
Top

Oh No!

Postby Thug4Life » Wed Apr 06, 2011 3:27 am

Plant radiation monitor says levels immeasurable

A radiation monitor at the troubled Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant says workers there are exposed to immeasurable levels of radiation.

The monitor told NHK that no one can enter the plant's No. 1 through 3 reactor buildings because radiation levels are so high that monitoring devices have been rendered useless. He said even levels outside the buildings exceed 100 millisieverts in some places.

Pools and streams of water contaminated by high-level radiation are being found throughout the facility.

The monitor said he takes measurements as soon as he finds water, because he can't determine whether it's contaminated just by looking at it. He said he's very worried about the safety of workers there.

Contaminated water and efforts to remove it have been hampering much-needed work to cool the reactors.

The monitor expressed frustration, likening the situation to looking up a mountain that one has to climb, without having taken a step up.

Tuesday, April 05, 2011


:/
User avatar
Thug4Life
Maezumo
 
Posts: 120
Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2011 2:53 pm
Location: HANGZHOU
Top

Postby AML » Wed Apr 06, 2011 4:50 am

While I was in the line to get my re-entry visa, I saw a few Chinese owning up to being illegal. One guy didn't even have a valid passport and he was trying to get re-entry....
Fucked Dolphin
User avatar
AML
Maezumo
 
Posts: 194
Joined: Wed Sep 08, 2010 11:40 am
Top

Postby Yokohammer » Wed Apr 06, 2011 5:40 am

omae mona wrote:I ain't gonna jump in to defend TEPCO here, but what exactly is the "inconvenience" that residents of Namie suffered? I got lots of inconvenience too here in Tokyo.. ..

Radiation levels exceeding the "stay indoors" level. Higher than Iidate-mura, even. Contaminated soil that will make the town's produce unsellable (whether the danger is real or imagined by the consumer doesn't really matter). Basically the same as everyone else in the contaminated areas.

But most of all: it ain't over yet.

All this "there's no scientifically proven danger" talk is fine, but the fact is the poor people are terrified. They are terrified on a daily basis, with no end in sight. They aren't scientists, they're basic townsfolk fearing for their lives and futures, and those of their children. Their viewpoint is valid too: if there's a need to evacuate or stay indoors, there must be a danger. And that's just the psychological impact. The economic impact is very real too. Tepco's response is just unacceptable. "Here's 1,000 yen to allay your mortal fear, now go away and leave us alone." I don't think so.

EDIT: In this morning's news, apparently the government has ordered TEPCO to pay each evacuee household an initial sum of around 1,000,000 yen to tide them over until full compensation can be decided upon.
_/_/_/ Phmeh ... _/_/_/
User avatar
Yokohammer
 
Posts: 5090
Joined: Tue Sep 30, 2008 6:41 pm
Location: South of Sendai
Top

Postby Tsuru » Wed Apr 06, 2011 5:46 am

CrankyBastard wrote:I'm wondering how long it'll be before the whole world gets really pissed off at Japan for crapping in its own backyard and shoveling the shit into the ocean to share with everyone.
:(
SK is starting to lose its patience, not surprisingly as this is probably only the start of TEPCO's excorcism of the plant's contaminated water.

It is surprising how much of the radioactivity apparently has been "caught" in the water and merely has to be drained/cleaned off (according to everyone's favourite power company) to allow work to continue.
"Doing engineering calculations with the imperial system is like wiping your ass with acorns, it works, but it's painful and stupid."

"Plus, it's British."

- Nameless
User avatar
Tsuru
 
Posts: 2408
Joined: Tue Jan 14, 2003 9:08 am
Location: Farcical Blingboddery
Top

Postby omae mona » Wed Apr 06, 2011 7:09 am

Yokohammer wrote:Radiation levels exceeding the "stay indoors" level. Higher than Iidate-mura, even.


Oh dear. Well that is a rather key fact that was omitted from the news article. Where did you get that info, by the way?

Contaminated soil that will make the town's produce unsellable (whether the danger is real or imagined by the consumer doesn't really matter). Basically the same as everyone else in the contaminated areas.


We already know that TEPCO and/or the government is going to have to pay sellers for produce that was actually banned for sale. That's clearly separate from this "meiwaku" compensation from TEPCO, will be much larger than 1000 yen, and only applies to farmers.

Is TEPCO going to be on the hook for indirect damages, like losses caused by consumer choices based on a perception of danger that the government does not deem legitimate? If people stop buying milk that has absolutely nothing wrong with it, is TEPCO going to have to compensate the sellers?

Are they on the hook for psychological damage? If so, is the damage measured by how upset people are (e.g. does somebody freaking out in Tokyo get more money than a professor 35km from Fukushima who realizes there is no immediate danger?) Or is the damage measured by how far they are from Fukushima (e.g. the professor gets a lot of money for going about his daily life, while the person who had to check into a mental hospital in Tokyo gets nothing?)

This is going to be a very hot topic, I think.

All this "there's no scientifically proven danger" talk is fine, but the fact is the poor people are terrified. They are terrified on a daily basis, with no end in sight. They aren't scientists, they're basic townsfolk fearing for their lives and futures, and those of their children. Their viewpoint is valid too: if there's a need to evacuate or stay indoors, there must be a danger. And that's just the psychological impact. The economic impact is very real too. Tepco's response is just unacceptable. "Here's 1,000 yen to allay your mortal fear, now go away and leave us alone." I don't think so.

EDIT: In this morning's news, apparently the government has ordered TEPCO to pay each evacuee household an initial sum of around 1,000,000 yen to tide them over until full compensation can be decided upon.

Holy cow, if there's a need to evacuate or stay indoors there is indeed a very economic impact. Being removed from your home or prevented from going about your daily life is COMPLETELY different than being nervous because of what you read on 2ch, misunderstood on the news, mistrusted the government recommendations, or even had a legitimate, scientifically grounded fear. 1,000,000 yen for evacuees sounds like a reasonable start for compensation..


But going back to the news article I was referring to, did you hear this town (Namie) needed to be evacuated or people were ordered to stay indoors? The article says it is outside of the 20km evacuation zone and outside of the 30km "stay indoors" zone. So I am trying to understand their claim for more than 1000 yen.
User avatar
omae mona
 
Posts: 3184
Joined: Mon Aug 18, 2003 12:08 pm
Top

PreviousNext

Post a reply
4454 posts • Page 58 of 149 • 1 ... 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61 ... 149

Return to Earthquakes, Tsunamis, Nukes, and other Catastrophes

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

  • Board index
  • The team • Delete all board cookies • All times are UTC + 9 hours
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group