Home | Forums | Mark forums read | Search | FAQ | Login

Advanced search
Hot Topics
Buraku hot topic Swapping Tokyo For Greenland
Buraku hot topic Japan Not Included in Analyst's List Of Top US Allies
Buraku hot topic Dutch wives for sale
Buraku hot topic Tokyo cab reaches NY from Argentina, meter running
Buraku hot topic Iran, DPRK, Nuke em, Like Japan
Buraku hot topic Stupid Youtube cunts cashing in on Logan Paul fiasco
Buraku hot topic Japanese Can't Handle Being Fucked In Paris
Buraku hot topic Multiculturalism on the rise?
Buraku hot topic Whats with all the Iranians?
Buraku hot topic MARS...Let's Go!
Change font size
  • fuckedgaijin ‹ General ‹ Gaijin Ghetto

What is the Japanese word for "esquivalience"?

Groovin' in the Gaijin Gulag
Post a reply
16 posts • Page 1 of 1

What is the Japanese word for "esquivalience"?

Postby Taro Toporific » Tue Oct 25, 2005 11:58 pm

:?: :?: :?: :?: :?: :?: :?: :?: :?: :?:
The New Yorker: The Talk of the Town 2005-08-22

...the recently published second edition of the New Oxford American Dictionary contains a made-up word that starts with the letter "e" an independent investigator set himself the task of sifting through NOAD's thirty-one hundred and twenty-eight "e" entries in search of the phony.....
_________
FUCK THE 2020 OLYMPICS!
User avatar
Taro Toporific
 
Posts: 10021532
Images: 0
Joined: Tue Sep 10, 2002 2:02 pm
Top

Postby Cubed » Wed Oct 26, 2005 2:43 am

I heard that fake words in dictionaries was a copyright thing, if that's what this articles about ... yes it s, that not really news.

The New Yorker is not really rapier-wit, up-to-the-minute journalism or comment. :wink:
"The man who trades freedom for security does not deserve nor will he ever receive either." Benjamin Franklin
Cubed
Maezumo
 
Posts: 310
Joined: Fri Sep 26, 2003 6:04 am
Location: On Odaiba's artificial beach, sunbathing in the dying twilight
Top

Postby Charles » Wed Oct 26, 2005 4:46 am

Cubed wrote:The New Yorker is not really rapier-wit, up-to-the-minute journalism or comment. :wink:


You don't actually read The New Yorker, obviously.

Just to give one recent example, Sy Hersh broke the Abu Graib torture scandal in The New Yorker.
User avatar
Charles
Maezumo
 
Posts: 4050
Joined: Tue Oct 14, 2003 6:14 am
Top

Postby Cubed » Wed Oct 26, 2005 7:52 am

Charles wrote:
Cubed wrote:The New Yorker is not really rapier-wit, up-to-the-minute journalism or comment. :wink:


You don't actually read The New Yorker, obviously.

You're quite right, I don't. OTOH, I made a point about the subject matter not the medium - the article recently published in the New Yorker was news last year in it's rival publications.

I see the New Yorker is published by that highbrow emporium called Conde Nast, whose other titles include Glamour Magazine, Vogue, Teen Vogue, Self, Modern Bride, Bride and Lucky. I don't read them either as they're hardly relevant.

But if you're interested in horoscopes, makeup, wedding dresses, celebrity gossip, boys ... :lol:
"The man who trades freedom for security does not deserve nor will he ever receive either." Benjamin Franklin
Cubed
Maezumo
 
Posts: 310
Joined: Fri Sep 26, 2003 6:04 am
Location: On Odaiba's artificial beach, sunbathing in the dying twilight
Top

Postby Charles » Wed Oct 26, 2005 9:54 am

Cubed wrote:
Charles wrote:
Cubed wrote:The New Yorker is not really rapier-wit, up-to-the-minute journalism or comment. :wink:


You don't actually read The New Yorker, obviously.

You're quite right, I don't. OTOH, I made a point about the subject matter not the medium - the article recently published in the New Yorker was news last year in it's rival publications.


I guess there's no point in arguing the merits of a literary magazine with someone so illiterate they dosn't know how to use the possessive "its" correctly.

Cubed wrote:I see the New Yorker is published by that highbrow emporium called Conde Nast, whose other titles include Glamour Magazine, Vogue, Teen Vogue, Self, Modern Bride, Bride and Lucky. I don't read them either as they're hardly relevant.

But if you're interested in horoscopes, makeup, wedding dresses, celebrity gossip, boys ... :lol:

You omitted Vanity Fair, which is also widely known for its journalism.
User avatar
Charles
Maezumo
 
Posts: 4050
Joined: Tue Oct 14, 2003 6:14 am
Top

Postby james » Wed Oct 26, 2005 10:12 am

Charles wrote:I guess there's no point in arguing the merits of a literary magazine with someone so illiterate they dosn't know how to use the possessive "its" correctly.


shouldn't that be "they doesn't know"? :P
User avatar
james
 
Posts: 1829
Images: 1
Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2004 9:21 am
Location: off the deep end
Top

Postby Greji » Wed Oct 26, 2005 10:40 am

james wrote:
Charles wrote:I guess there's no point in arguing the merits of a literary magazine with someone so illiterate they dosn't know how to use the possessive "its" correctly.


shouldn't that be "they doesn't know"? :P


James, dosn't you no nuttin? "Dosn't" is a very important contraction of "Dos" and "Nut-toggle". It is critical for describing typographical errors in text by use of typographical errors. A very common word in New York publications!

:lol: :rofl: :lol:
"There are those that learn by reading. Then a few who learn by observation. The rest have to piss on an electric fence and find out for themselves!"- Will Rogers
:kanpai:
User avatar
Greji
 
Posts: 14357
Joined: Fri Jun 25, 2004 3:00 pm
Location: Yoshiwara
Top

Postby Taro Toporific » Wed Oct 26, 2005 10:48 am

_________
FUCK THE 2020 OLYMPICS!
User avatar
Taro Toporific
 
Posts: 10021532
Images: 0
Joined: Tue Sep 10, 2002 2:02 pm
Top

Postby Charles » Wed Oct 26, 2005 11:01 am

It is probably better to make an edit error changing "doesn't" to "don't" than to be illiterate and not know the difference between "its" and "it's."

But the point being, "everyone else" wrote trivial stories about how there are fake words in the dictionary. The New Yorker actually researched the story, consulted lexicologists and editors, and passed the final story through their world-famous fact checking department.
User avatar
Charles
Maezumo
 
Posts: 4050
Joined: Tue Oct 14, 2003 6:14 am
Top

Postby Cubed » Wed Oct 26, 2005 9:50 pm

Charles wrote:I guess there's no point in arguing the merits of a literary magazine with someone so illiterate they dosn't know how to use the possessive "its" correctly.


:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

I love it when someone criticizes other peoples' grammar but can't get it right themselves.

You just pissed on your own bonfire. Vanity Fair? Yes, that's an incisive publication.

Next to Teen Vogue. :roll:

Charles wrote:their world-famous fact checking department.

I can see their World Famous Fact Checking Department in action right now:

Editor: "Who is Tom Cruise dating right now?"
World Renowned Journalist: "I'll get straight on it ... "
"The man who trades freedom for security does not deserve nor will he ever receive either." Benjamin Franklin
Cubed
Maezumo
 
Posts: 310
Joined: Fri Sep 26, 2003 6:04 am
Location: On Odaiba's artificial beach, sunbathing in the dying twilight
Top

Postby Charles » Wed Oct 26, 2005 10:21 pm

Cubed wrote:You just pissed on your own bonfire. Vanity Fair? Yes, that's an incisive publication.

It is obvious you don't actually read Vanity Fair. Gore Vidal has been publishing some of the most incisive essays about the Iraq war in Vanity Fair.

It could be argued that the only two writers in the US that have consistently got it right about Iraq were The New Yorker's Sy Hersh and Vanity Fair's Gore Vidal.
User avatar
Charles
Maezumo
 
Posts: 4050
Joined: Tue Oct 14, 2003 6:14 am
Top

Postby Greji » Wed Oct 26, 2005 11:27 pm

Charles wrote:
Cubed wrote:You just pissed on your own bonfire. Vanity Fair? Yes, that's an incisive publication.

It is obvious you don't actually read Vanity Fair. Gore Vidal has been publishing some of the most incisive essays about the Iraq war in Vanity Fair.

It could be argued that the only two writers in the US that have consistently got it right about Iraq were The New Yorker's Sy Hersh and Vanity Fair's Gore Vidal.


I think your paraphrasing that statement with "It could be argued", saves me from interjecting a post here!

:wall:
"There are those that learn by reading. Then a few who learn by observation. The rest have to piss on an electric fence and find out for themselves!"- Will Rogers
:kanpai:
User avatar
Greji
 
Posts: 14357
Joined: Fri Jun 25, 2004 3:00 pm
Location: Yoshiwara
Top

Postby Cubed » Thu Oct 27, 2005 1:59 am

Charles wrote:
Cubed wrote:You just pissed on your own bonfire. Vanity Fair? Yes, that's an incisive publication.

It is obvious you don't actually read Vanity Fair. Gore Vidal has been publishing some of the most incisive essays about the Iraq war in Vanity Fair.

It could be argued that the only two writers in the US that have consistently got it right about Iraq were The New Yorker's Sy Hersh and Vanity Fair's Gore Vidal.


Britney Spears got it right too, by saying "I think we should all just trust our president and do whatever he says".

She probably said that in one of their other magazines - Teen Vogue perhaps.
"The man who trades freedom for security does not deserve nor will he ever receive either." Benjamin Franklin
Cubed
Maezumo
 
Posts: 310
Joined: Fri Sep 26, 2003 6:04 am
Location: On Odaiba's artificial beach, sunbathing in the dying twilight
Top

Postby Charles » Thu Oct 27, 2005 5:38 am

Cubed wrote:Britney Spears got it right too, by saying "I think we should all just trust our president and do whatever he says".
User avatar
Charles
Maezumo
 
Posts: 4050
Joined: Tue Oct 14, 2003 6:14 am
Top

Mmmm

Postby kurohinge1 » Thu Oct 27, 2005 9:25 am

Taro Toporific wrote:... The point of this post is about whether any of you can remember fake words you have found in Japanese dictionaries ...


Reminds me of the uni student (very cheap!) game where you make up the meaning for a word no one knows from the dictionary, selected each round by the next person.

The entries are all read out, including the real one, and then everyone votes on which they think is the real one. You win a point for everyone who votes for your fake entry and a point if you pick the real one.

Good for trips to places without electricity. :wink:
  • "This is the verdict: . . . " (John 3:19-21)
  • "It could be that the purpose of your life is only to serve as a warning to others" (Anon)
User avatar
kurohinge1
Maezumo
 
Posts: 2745
Joined: Fri Apr 11, 2003 12:52 pm
Location: Sydney, Australia
Top

Re: Mmmm

Postby Taro Toporific » Thu Oct 27, 2005 11:39 am

kurohinge1 wrote:... game where you make up the meaning for a word no one knows from the dictionary, ....You win a point for everyone who votes for your fake entry and a point if you pick the real one.


Back when I other gaijin with me at work, we used to do that game with words from the JIS dictionary: 500yen per wrong vote.

I cleaned up on the bets in this game with a bonehead document from Mitsubishi Materials was full of the term "star-pipy" --- a plastic 'star extrusion" was the intended.
The JIS Dictionary J-to-E was wrong once again <sigh> with "pipy" listed as a proper English term. Our further investigations found that KENKYUSHA's listing for English "extrusion" had engrish "pipy" in katakana.

=======
"The stem was all pipy and slimy".
-- Keats.
[1913 Webster] pipy Like a pipe; hollow-stemmed.
_________
FUCK THE 2020 OLYMPICS!
User avatar
Taro Toporific
 
Posts: 10021532
Images: 0
Joined: Tue Sep 10, 2002 2:02 pm
Top


Post a reply
16 posts • Page 1 of 1

Return to Gaijin Ghetto

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests

  • Board index
  • The team • Delete all board cookies • All times are UTC + 9 hours
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group