Hot Topics | |
---|---|
puargs wrote:I'm doing a short research project on the differences between Japanese and American women... anyone seen any (legitimate, not Mainichi WaiWai) surveys of interest that compare the two (or just from one country, that I could easily find the other country's counterpart)? I know you all have to have seen some good ones.
puargs wrote:I'm doing a short research project on the differences between Japanese and American women...
kurohinge1 wrote:That's very brave of you to admit that you're only qualified for short research into such ladies.
]http://www.fuckedgaijin.com/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=879&stc=1&d=1143719051[/IMG]
puargs wrote:Well, I just finished my draft write-up anyway, and it's not as stupid as it seems, GG. There were a few interesting tidbits in there, like how 56.2% of men in Japan are "happy", while 62.9% of women are. By contrast, in America, both men and women rated at an almost exact amount- 84% in each category said they were "happy".
cstaylor wrote:Can anybody clue me in to where this idea came from? I've heard it in conversation before, usually from people with very little exposure to asians.
puargs wrote:Charles- Thanks for the site and the moral support dude, lord knows I need it sometimes here, hahahaha. Actually yeah, most of the surveys I did look at do support exactly what you saw before- Japanese women do claim to be happier the more traditional a lifestyle they lead. Who knows how loaded the surveys are, or how loaded the women who take them are, but that seems to be the trend. Really weird.
puargs wrote:Charles- Thanks for the site and the moral support dude, lord knows I need it sometimes here, hahahaha. Actually yeah, most of the surveys I did look at do support exactly what you saw before- Japanese women do claim to be happier the more traditional a lifestyle they lead. Who knows how loaded the surveys are, or how loaded the women who take them are, but that seems to be the trend. Really weird.
Charles wrote:Consider that these surveys tend to be post-bubble. Female employment went way up during the bubble, but then it went back down to "normal" when the bubble popped. So the women who dared to try for a career (the non-traditional lifestyle) tended to suffer from the downturn more than the traditionalist housewives.
You can probably tell I had far too much of this stuff hammered into me during my classroom years.
GomiGirl wrote:This post was even more stupid than the survey topic...
Why do I think it is stupid? People tend to use these stats to think they "KNOW" what another person is like before they meet them.. eg, a STEREOTYPE and that is ignorant to prejudge anybody based on age, gender, religion, nationality etc.. and we all know what idiots who think in stereotypes are like.. don't we Charles???
Charles wrote:Why do you think I fight stereotypes with stereotypes? You yourself have criticized your fellow countrymen for their bigotry. Didn't it ever occur to you that my little ozzie bashing is just a way to show them what it's like to be on the RECEIVING end for once? Don't like it? GOOD. That's the point.
kamome wrote:Your indignance against Charles's bizarre anti-Australian rants is well-placed, but don't make the mistake of thinking he speaks for all Americans.
kamome wrote:Your indignance against Charles's bizarre anti-Australian rants is well-placed, but don't make the mistake of thinking he speaks for all Americans.
cstaylor wrote:When I read posts like amdg's, all I get is "seppo.... blah blah blah". When it comes to racial tolerance, Australia is not the first country that pops into my head.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests