There's a baffling article in the Japan Times today regarding changes Keidanren is pushing in abolishing overtime pay:
http://search.japantimes.co.jp/cgi-bin/fs20060718a3.html
EXCERPT:
Keidanren insists that changes to labor practices that would eliminate overtime, modeled after the "white-collar exemption rule" in the U.S., are needed in order for Japan to "maintain international competitiveness."
Keidanren says workers in Japan should be rewarded for ideas, not hours. Hiroyuki Matsui, director of the organization's Labor Policy Bureau II, says that in white-collar jobs, "working hours and wages should be separated."
"We can't compete with China and South Korea by just working long hours," he said. "For the Japanese economy, which has caught up with that of Europe, to keep its competitive edge (over the rest of Asia), we can't maintain the current labor management system."
END EXCERPT
I'm having trouble penetrating the layers of BS, tatemae, and doublespeak here. "Sabisu zangyo" is the norm in Japan, is it not? Whatever laws that exist mandating overtime pay are observed in the breach. So what does Keidanren want? A simple elimination of existing tatemae laws? They imply that pay should be based on productivity, but what they really seem to be aiming for is even more "sabisu zangyo". When you divide the average salaryman's time spent at his desk by his salary, the hourly rate already works out to be somewhere near that of a Nike sweatshop worker in Vietnam. I guess Keidanren feels like that's too high, and are shooting for Cambodia-level hourly wages.