Home | Forums | Mark forums read | Search | FAQ | Login

Advanced search
Hot Topics
Buraku hot topic Iran, DPRK, Nuke em, Like Japan
Buraku hot topic Multiculturalism on the rise?
Buraku hot topic Whats with all the Iranians?
Buraku hot topic MARS...Let's Go!
Buraku hot topic Japan Not Included in Analyst's List Of Top US Allies
Buraku hot topic Japanese Can't Handle Being Fucked In Paris
Buraku hot topic Tokyo cab reaches NY from Argentina, meter running
Buraku hot topic 'Oh my gods! They killed ASIMO!'
Buraku hot topic Stupid Youtube cunts cashing in on Logan Paul fiasco
Buraku hot topic Re: Adam and Joe
Change font size
  • fuckedgaijin ‹ General ‹ F*cked News

Concrete rivers make Japan's water No. 5 ????

Odd news from Japan and all things Japanese around the world.
Post a reply
4 posts • Page 1 of 1

Concrete rivers make Japan's water No. 5 ????

Postby Taro Toporific » Thu Mar 06, 2003 12:26 am

Water Crisis to Deepen as Supplies Dry Out - U.N. PARIS (Reuters) - World water reserves are drying up fast and booming populations, pollution and global warming will combine to cut the average person's water supply by a third in the next 20 years, a United Nations report said on Wednesday. The report, published ahead of the Third World Water Forum due to take place in Kyoto, Japan, from March 16 to 23...
Billed as the most comprehensive survey of the state of the resource, the report compared 122 countries for the quality of their water and their ability and willingness to improve it.
The report said Belgium's low quantity and quality of groundwater was combined with heavy industrial pollution and poor treatment of wastewater. Top of the quality ranking was Finland, followed by Canada, New Zealand, Britain and Japan.
Belgium got the lowest score, below less developed countries including India, Sudan and Rwanda, which also ranked among the world's 10 worst water providers. [[USA ranked No. 12]]
_________
FUCK THE 2020 OLYMPICS!
User avatar
Taro Toporific
 
Posts: 10021532
Images: 0
Joined: Tue Sep 10, 2002 2:02 pm
Top

Postby Maciamo » Thu Mar 06, 2003 10:33 am

The article also says that, in 2050, 7 out of the then 9 billion people on earth could suffer from thirst if nothing is done. Quite worrying, as it's in less than 50 years. We'll be old, but justly that will that more difficult to fight for water, especially if youngers criticise us for not acting when we could in the early 2000's ! :cry:

That reminds me that the US haven't ratified the Kyoto treaty, because it's actually related and coherent with their war in Iraq. The US don't want to reduce carbon dioxide emission, but justly to increase them and that's why they are fighting for oil. It wouldn't be difficult for the States to comply with new ecological rules. They have the scientific capacity and wealth necessary to adapt and even lead the market. They are the only modern nation to have refused their responsibility towards future genereration. Because that gives a clear advantage to the American industry, other nations feel ressentment against the arrogant American who don't need to care about the world eventhough they are the worst polluters, and only care about their economic benefits. Let's see what the US will decide about water this time.
Visit my site on Japan, My Homepage and the site of my travels to India
Maciamo
Maezumo
 
Posts: 115
Joined: Tue Aug 20, 2002 3:43 pm
Location: Tokyo
  • Website
  • ICQ
Top

Postby GuyJean » Thu Mar 06, 2003 11:18 am

Maciamo wrote:That reminds me that the US haven't ratified the Kyoto treaty, because it's actually related and coherent with their war in Iraq.

I'm not sure if it's related, but not ratifying the Kyoto treaty is a real pisser! The man who actually got more votes in 2000, Gore, would have.. He flew to Japan in his jumbo jet to sign it..

I think the US's beef isn't that they WANT to spew MORE CO2. It's that the economy would actually have to constrict, while other developing nations wouldn't be bound to the same restrictions..

Also, the Kyoto treaty, in my opinion, was more an ideal, not reality. There's no way, realistically, to reduce CO2 within the treaty's specified time frame.. The US, along with most other countries, would always be breaking the treaty.

But I REALLY think Bush has no vision and is going down the wrong path. Gore, at least, had vision. He's very concerned about the environment.

Buuuuut... recently Bush alotted something like 4 billion dollars to promote Hydrogen powered transportation.. Do you know what the exhaust is on a Hydro-mobile? WATER!

Just imagine driving around in the future and pulling over to drink your exhaust! That's like killing 5 birds with 1 stone!..

GJ
[SIZE="1"]Worthy Linkage: SomaFM Net Radio - Slate Explainer - MercyCorp Donations - FG Donations - TDV DailyMotion Vids - OnionTV[/SIZE]
User avatar
GuyJean
 
Posts: 5720
Joined: Sun Apr 14, 2002 2:44 pm
Location: Taro's Old Butt Plug
  • Website
Top


Post a reply
4 posts • Page 1 of 1

Return to F*cked News

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

  • Board index
  • The team • Delete all board cookies • All times are UTC + 9 hours
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group