Home | Forums | Mark forums read | Search | FAQ | Login

Advanced search
Hot Topics
Buraku hot topic Swapping Tokyo For Greenland
Buraku hot topic Japan Not Included in Analyst's List Of Top US Allies
Buraku hot topic Dutch wives for sale
Buraku hot topic Tokyo cab reaches NY from Argentina, meter running
Buraku hot topic Iran, DPRK, Nuke em, Like Japan
Buraku hot topic Stupid Youtube cunts cashing in on Logan Paul fiasco
Buraku hot topic Japanese Can't Handle Being Fucked In Paris
Buraku hot topic Multiculturalism on the rise?
Buraku hot topic Whats with all the Iranians?
Buraku hot topic MARS...Let's Go!
Change font size
  • fuckedgaijin ‹ General ‹ Gaijin Ghetto

Cheney: Cha-Ching!

Groovin' in the Gaijin Gulag
Post a reply
44 posts • Page 2 of 2 • 1, 2

Re: suggested attire cont'd

Postby GomiGirl » Wed Mar 26, 2003 4:54 pm

bikkle wrote:
GomiGirl wrote:Have you been into my personal photo collection again Ultra-san???


Image Image Image


Ah yes the early years... corsets are my thing now..
GomiGirl
The Keitai Goddess!!!
User avatar
GomiGirl
 
Posts: 9129
Joined: Fri Jul 05, 2002 3:56 pm
Location: Roamin' with my fave 12"!!
  • Website
Top

Postby GomiGirl » Wed Mar 26, 2003 5:12 pm

Gaisaradatsuraku! wrote:You're just a dumb **** shacking up with a Jap musician and you think that makes you special. You are nothing and your husband is a loser. You know nothing about Japan except your daily life.


*GG sticking up for gomichild*

Completely untrue but more importantly completely unneccessary!!!
GomiGirl
The Keitai Goddess!!!
User avatar
GomiGirl
 
Posts: 9129
Joined: Fri Jul 05, 2002 3:56 pm
Location: Roamin' with my fave 12"!!
  • Website
Top

Postby American Oyaji » Wed Mar 26, 2003 8:43 pm

Gai,

You were doing great until you started name calling.

Here's some water.

Now get back in there.


*DING* ROUND 2 :twisted:
I will not abide ignorant intolerance just for the sake of getting along.
User avatar
American Oyaji
 
Posts: 6540
Images: 0
Joined: Sun Oct 20, 2002 9:20 pm
Location: The Evidence of Things Unseen
  • ICQ
  • YIM
  • Personal album
Top

Postby Resolute Optimist » Sat Apr 05, 2003 4:01 am

When Chiraq said he would vote against a 2nd resolution no matter what, I changed my mind... what a wonderful example of diplomacy :roll:

I don't understand what the major issue is for the anti-war party anymore. Are you against war by principle? I think there aren't many people who LIKE war by principle. However, it is also very convenient to prone non-intervention when we are sitting in the comfort of our democratic, liberal economy homelands. I can't see that being for the removal of tyrants (and in Hussein's case, he might not be dangerous NOW to US - because that is why you don't want us to go in isn't it?- but can you guarantee that Iraq wouldn't have become NK2 in the next 5 years?) is an any less valid cause. In both cases lives will be lost, but so far Hussein has killed approx.
700 000, so what is for worse?
The economy aspects... undeniable I suppose. But please don't be fooled by France's stance, they own one of the biggest oil companies in Iraq (Total Elf) and were doing quite nicely. At least maybe the oil will become a benefit to the Iraquis at last, creating jobs and a better redistribution of wealth.
There was a time when it was easier for people to stand up and take over when denied their rights. I don't think it's as easy as picking up your garden fork and walking on the Bastille in Iraq, considering the effort and dedication that SH's regime has put into keeping people terrorized. How can you use the "un enthusiastic" reception of the coalition troops as an alibi? Have you all forgotten the betrayl of the First Gulf War when under pressure from the UN, American troops left Iraq and abandoned the Iraquis who had uprisen? How would you behave the next time round when your father, uncle, brother and son had been shot for being enthusiastic? And yes, in the end, I think it is down to these sort of things, branded by anti war protesters as being too easy... so what DOES it take for a non-interventionist attitude to become non-assistance to persons in danger? Because not helping people because of the economical side of this war is also putting oil before people.

However, I'm not so convinced as to the coalition gaining the general arabo-muslim opinion. And this is where the trouble starts. Talk about Palestine, they'd be all for it because it holds a great symbolic value, religion against religion. (By the way, confided by my Syrian friend, apparently the Palestinian people were always considered as "flea-bitten savages" by arabic nations!!!). Arabic muslims (I insist on associating the two because it does concern more specifically those of muslim confession) feel a cohesion between themselves as a cultural community, but the incoherencies within that general feeling pinpoints in my mind the crisis that the Middle East is going through on a social level. Saddam, a muslim tortures his own people. But that holds no symbolic value to them. Tyrants are symbolic when they represent the oppressor of a religion, someone for a religious community to uprise against. Had Saddam been a christian I don't think they would covet the same position.

And I do hope that it will take away the sense of impunity to other tyrants... Mugabe is currently calling himself "Hitler" and has now precipitated the region to the brink of famine... I just think that although an honorable stance, being antiwar BY PRINCIPLE, is doing more to cut the West off from the rest of the world by almost suggesting that we are the cause of most wars and secondly by pretending that there won't be some other totalitarian nation willing to do it for us and in terms less fair than attacking countries oppressed by tyrants, etc...

And here I say no more ( I hear sighs of relief!). :)
Resolute Optimist
Maezumo
 
Posts: 73
Joined: Fri Feb 28, 2003 9:57 pm
Top

Postby This is a pen » Wed Sep 28, 2005 12:08 pm

The Chairman of the Louisiana Democratic Party gets a $100,000,000
No-Bid "Halliburton type" Contract to help rebuild New Orleans.



Where is all the Outrage?


1. The Story
2. About the CEO
User avatar
This is a pen
 
Posts: 545
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 8:54 pm
Top

Postby FG Lurker » Wed Sep 28, 2005 12:17 pm

As a non-Jesuslander I would love to form a company to get onto this gravy train... Give me all your tax dollars! :lol:

It's interesting (in a macabre sort of way) to watch the US destroy itself... The only question is how long it will take and how badly it will affect the rest of the world.
And you run and you run to catch up with the sun but it's sinking
Racing around to come up behind you again
The sun is the same in a relative way, but you're older
Shorter of breath and one day closer to death
User avatar
FG Lurker
 
Posts: 7854
Joined: Mon Nov 29, 2004 6:16 pm
Location: On the run
Top

Postby GuyJean » Wed Sep 28, 2005 7:27 pm

This is a pen wrote:Where is all the Outrage?
Again, if you actually read the whole article, the 'outrage' is coming from the Democrats:
Several Democrats and outside experts have raised additional questions about how the government spends the money allocated for Katrina relief. - http://www.corpwatch.org/article.php?id=12620
No bid contracts are BS, in my opinion, no matter what party.. But Katrina happened in Shaw's own back yard:
Mr. Bernhard is a native of Baton Rouge, Louisiana where he currently lives with his wife Dana and their children. He graduated from Louisiana State University in 1976 with a degree in Construction Management. - http://www.lademo.org/index.php?display=ShowPage&id=329508
GJ
[SIZE="1"]Worthy Linkage: SomaFM Net Radio - Slate Explainer - MercyCorp Donations - FG Donations - TDV DailyMotion Vids - OnionTV[/SIZE]
User avatar
GuyJean
 
Posts: 5720
Joined: Sun Apr 14, 2002 2:44 pm
Location: Taro's Old Butt Plug
  • Website
Top

Postby This is a pen » Wed Sep 28, 2005 8:29 pm

GuyJean wrote:
This is a pen wrote:Where is all the Outrage?
Again, if you actually read the whole article, the 'outrage' is coming from the Democrats:
Several Democrats and outside experts have raised additional questions about how the government spends the money allocated for Katrina relief. - http://www.corpwatch.org/article.php?id=12620


Do you think the Reaction would have been the same if it was the Chairman of the Republican Party of Louisiana whose company was getting No-Bid Contracts?

GuyJean wrote:No bid contracts are BS, in my opinion, no matter what party


We agree

GuyJean wrote:.. But Katrina happened in Shaw's own back yard:
Mr. Bernhard is a native of Baton Rouge, Louisiana where he currently lives with his wife Dana and their children. He graduated from Louisiana State University in 1976 with a degree in Construction Management. - http://www.lademo.org/index.php?display=ShowPage&id=329508
GJ


Let me make sure I understand you on this,
This guy has ties to the Area, so it's OK if he profits from the bad things that happen there?

If that's the case, ......I think Cheney has some ties to Iraq....... :-)
User avatar
This is a pen
 
Posts: 545
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 8:54 pm
Top

Postby GuyJean » Wed Sep 28, 2005 9:18 pm

This is a pen wrote:Do you think the Reaction would have been the same if it was the Chairman of the Republican Party of Louisiana whose company was getting No-Bid Contracts?
What do you mean? Democrats and outsiders asking questions (including questions about fellow Democrats), CNN featuring a story on 'questionable' no-bid contracts, and the Government Accountability Office conducting audits isn't a big enough 'reaction' for you?:
The inspectors general from half a dozen agencies, as well as officials from the Government Accountability Office, on Wednesday were addressing a House subcommittee on the Katrina cleanup and announcing several new audits to combat waste and fraud.

They are pledging strong oversight that includes a review of no-bid contracts and close scrutiny of federal employees who now enjoy a $250,000 -- rather than a $2,500 -- purchase limit for Katrina-related expenses on their government-issued credit cards. - http://edition.cnn.com/2005/POLITICS/09/28/congress.katrina.ap/index.html

This is a pen wrote:If that's the case, ......I think Cheney has some ties to Iraq....... :-)
He was born, graduated, and raised his family in Iraq? Wow.. I didn't know that. Wouldn't that make him 'the enemy'?

GJ
[SIZE="1"]Worthy Linkage: SomaFM Net Radio - Slate Explainer - MercyCorp Donations - FG Donations - TDV DailyMotion Vids - OnionTV[/SIZE]
User avatar
GuyJean
 
Posts: 5720
Joined: Sun Apr 14, 2002 2:44 pm
Location: Taro's Old Butt Plug
  • Website
Top

Postby This is a pen » Wed Sep 28, 2005 9:48 pm

GuyJean wrote:
This is a pen wrote:Do you think the Reaction would have been the same if it was the Chairman of the Republican Party of Louisiana whose company was getting No-Bid Contracts?
What do you mean? Democrats and outsiders asking questions (including questions about fellow Democrats), CNN featuring a story on 'questionable' no-bid contracts, and the Government Accountability Office conducting audits isn't a big enough 'reaction' for you?:



Well......I was hoping for a press release critizising the wrong doers from Jesse Jackson, Moveon.org, Huffington Report, Barbra Streisand or Air America.


Hey!! It could happen!! :-)
User avatar
This is a pen
 
Posts: 545
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 8:54 pm
Top

bids

Postby Greji » Wed Sep 28, 2005 10:46 pm

This is a pen wrote:The Chairman of the Louisiana Democratic Party gets a $100,000,000
No-Bid "Halliburton type" Contract to help rebuild New Orleans.



[b]Where is all the Outrage?


There is one thing that has not be discussed in this to date, and that is expediency. Sure Halliburton and the Shaw Group have high profiles for both sides of the aisle. But the problem here is the government bidding process. These initial "we need now" public works are of such size that they require hugh organizations that can do the work and do it now, not wait for a year while we search for sub-contractors.

Since they need it now, how are you going to set up a government bidding system to get work done. It will take at least six months to a year to choose and verify a bidder. There is no time and if you have ever worked in government contracting, you would realize that sole source is the only way they could let this work with any hope of getting a fast, professional response.

Isn't fast action and response what the MSM and Dems have been saying is missing and screaming about? Now that it is finally begining, why does it need to be slowed down?

Granted this is not the best way to let bids, but these are not normal times, so I don't think there should be so much bickering, if we are getting the job we want accomplished, shoganai in this instance!

:shroom: :shroom: :shroom: :shroom: :shroom:
"There are those that learn by reading. Then a few who learn by observation. The rest have to piss on an electric fence and find out for themselves!"- Will Rogers
:kanpai:
User avatar
Greji
 
Posts: 14357
Joined: Fri Jun 25, 2004 3:00 pm
Location: Yoshiwara
Top

Re: Can Jason Pongi Save Us Now?

Postby FG Lurker » Wed Sep 28, 2005 11:31 pm

Rob Pongi wrote:Image

What makes you think Canada would want Smogifornia? Or any other Jesusland escapees for that matter...
And you run and you run to catch up with the sun but it's sinking
Racing around to come up behind you again
The sun is the same in a relative way, but you're older
Shorter of breath and one day closer to death
User avatar
FG Lurker
 
Posts: 7854
Joined: Mon Nov 29, 2004 6:16 pm
Location: On the run
Top

Re: Can Jason Pongi Save Us Now?

Postby cstaylor » Thu Sep 29, 2005 1:59 am

FG Lurker wrote:What makes you think Canada would want Smogifornia?
You'd be lucky to have us. Certainly more interesting than talking about hockey again. :wink:
User avatar
cstaylor
 
Posts: 6383
Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2002 2:07 am
Location: Yokohama, Japan
  • Website
Top

Re: bids

Postby GuyJean » Thu Sep 29, 2005 4:59 am

gboothe wrote:Granted this is not the best way to let bids, but these are not normal times, so I don't think there should be so much bickering, if we are getting the job we want accomplished, shoganai in this instance!
I agree; The no-bid contracts for a natural disaster shouldn't be compared to one's in a pre-planned, (or what I would've hoped to be 'pre-planned'), war..

But couldn't companies bid on contracts before a natural disaster strikes? The government goes to tender with a few expereinced companies, giving them the same worst-case scenario disaster, asking them to give quotes on clean up, management, etc... The one with the best cost and benefit wins the contract..

GJ
[SIZE="1"]Worthy Linkage: SomaFM Net Radio - Slate Explainer - MercyCorp Donations - FG Donations - TDV DailyMotion Vids - OnionTV[/SIZE]
User avatar
GuyJean
 
Posts: 5720
Joined: Sun Apr 14, 2002 2:44 pm
Location: Taro's Old Butt Plug
  • Website
Top

Previous

Post a reply
44 posts • Page 2 of 2 • 1, 2

Return to Gaijin Ghetto

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests

  • Board index
  • The team • Delete all board cookies • All times are UTC + 9 hours
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group