Hot Topics | |
---|---|
james wrote:...i am sure the *only* thing that saved this poor child's life is the fact that it was mid september instead of mid-august. that and the fact i happened to walk by when i did. the car was in direct sunlight and it was quite hot out. lots of people had walked both ways by the car and not a single one of them noticed (or cared).
Mike Oxlong wrote:How does the child protection system work in Japan? If it was in Canada, the doctor/authorities would very likely have social services check the home and parenting situation, ask around...maybe act if necessary. Does Japan have anything remotely like that?
Typhoon wrote:Only in Canada, eh?
And people accuse Japan of being an intrusive Nanny State.
In Canada, child welfare laws require that all cases of suspected child abuse must be investigated to determine if a child is in need of protection. If a child is determined to be in need of protection, the child welfare authorities may respond by, for example, providing counseling and support for the family, removing the child (temporarily or permanently) from the home, or removing the abuser(s) from the home. Criminal sanctions may also apply in cases of sexual or physical abuse.
Mike Oxlong wrote:If there were witnesses and/or suspicions of willful negligence, then yes, a social worker may be called.
http://www.justice.gc.ca/en/ps/fm/childafs.html
How do you define child abuse? Does the case FL mention constitute child abuse? How about the one James mentioned? Any of them? None of them? Why?
Mike Oxlong wrote:Do you think there would have been any repercussions had you broken a window (as a last resort) to save the infant?
Typhoon wrote:Leaving the kid in an overheated care is irresponsble - the kid's life could be endangered by dehydration and heatstroke.
The rest is whiny Nanny State nonsense.
Since you're fond of quoting dead statesmen.
"Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety and will lose both."
~ Benjamin Franklin
tinateoh wrote:When there is something unfortunate happen, most of the people will just point finger at the mother, even though sometimes it is plain accident just like the automatic door case in Roppongi few years back.
Typhoon wrote:Leaving the kid in an overheated care is irresponsble - the kid's life could be endangered by dehydration and heatstroke.
The rest is whiny Nanny State nonsense.
halfnip wrote:(she should be popping out in late December)
halfnip wrote:And controlling your kids is one thing, but what's up with these parents that have their kids on those leashes?
halfnip wrote:Like freakin' dogs or something....
FG Lurker wrote:There is very little difference between an untrained dog and a small child. Both need training, teaching, love, compassion, and yes, discipline. Too many people try to treat their kids as adults or friends. They are neither.
james wrote:don't forget food and water.. they need those too. it is parental instincts like these that have made me the exceptional father that i am today.
FG Lurker wrote:Congratulations!
I see nothing wrong with keeping small children on a leash. Some kids are placid and not prone to suddenly bolting into the street etc. Other kids are far worse than any untrained dog. Glance away for a fraction of a second and the kid is GONE. My sister was this way, and when she was small my mother regularly had her in a harness with a leash.
There is very little difference between an untrained dog and a small child. Both need training, teaching, love, compassion, and yes, discipline. Too many people try to treat their kids as adults or friends. They are neither.
Mike Oxlong wrote:So many of the Japanese I know say they spoil their kids because they want their kids to like them, and take care of them in their old age.
What a crock! Kids naturally love their parents, it's nature. But, these days most kids don't respect their parents, because their parents try to be cool and friends and cave in at the slightest pressure. Parents rasion d'etre is not to be liked, but to guide and teach and prepare kids for their adulthood. Discipline can be lessened as responsibilities and age increase. Yet I see very little of this nowadays.
FG Lurker wrote:This is a bad example. I'd give very good odds that this happened because the mother in question was letting her kids run rampant around the area, quite likely while she was yakking to a friend or on her phone. This drives me insane! Stores and shopping centers are NOT PLAYGROUNDS! Parents who let their kids run around screaming in such places should be beat over the head with large sticks. It's dangerous for the kids (see Roppongi door incident) and annoying as fuck for everyone else who is in the area.
That said, I agree 100% that the vast majority of people in Japanese cities won't lift a finger to help someone obviously in need. It's pathetic.
tinateoh wrote:Running around the mall... I said really depends on the place and time/ which mall (there are malls like Lalaport Toyosu that is more family friendly type is ok)
tinateoh wrote:But like you said too, kids are not adult, you don't expect them to behave like one even after you have constanly tell them not to do certain thing.
tinateoh wrote:Kids run and most of the time-noisy The people that feel annoyed by kids running and screaming sometimes should be more understanding, ...and not try to beat the parents head with a large stick:) .
FG Lurker wrote:Kids running is pretty normal. Kids running, screaming, dodging around other people, etc is playground activity and is NEVER acceptable in a shopping centre or other public space. This is basic manners and should be common sense. Sadly it is not.
No matter how you slice it, Roppongi Hills is not a place kids should be running around at all!
Kids who are taken out in public should be taught how to BEHAVE in public. Kids should be taught what is acceptable for a shopping centre or other "general use" public space and what is NOT. I don't expect kids to be perfect, but I sure as hell do not accept them running around a shopping centre as though it was the local park.
Why is understanding of bad manners necessary? The kids should be taught proper manners!
;)"Yeah, I've been always awkward toward women and have spent pathetic life so far but I could graduate from being a cherry boy by using geisha's pussy at last! Yeah!! And off course I have an account in Fuckedgaijin.com. Yeah!!!"
tinateoh wrote:Running around the mall... I said really depends on the place and time/ which mall (there are malls like Lalaport Toyosu that is more family friendly type is ok) and importantly, the parents attitude, like whether the kids are being watched all the time and being warned not to do certain things. But I think restaurant is a no-no for running around as there are hot foods and drinks around. But like you said too, kids are not adult, you don't expect them to behave like one even after you have constanly tell them not to do certain thing. Kids run and most of the time-noisy The people that feel annoyed by kids running and screaming sometimes should be more understanding, ...and not try to beat the parents head with a large stick:) .
...
tinateoh wrote:I have a 3 years old, I do teach and keep repeating the rules to him, but while he is learning all this, he tends to makes some mistakes on the way,especially in this terrible 2-3 years old rebellious period, and I do hope the people around are more understanding.
tinateoh wrote:I agree Roppongi Hills is not a suitable place for kids.
tinateoh wrote:But before your second last post on this, I thought the accident happenned while the mother and child was just trying to get in or get out of the building.
tinateoh wrote:but for example if a 3 years old scream and cries in a restaurant, are you annoyed by the noise? I guess for you, yes, and for many other customers too, so normally I would do is to bring him out until he calms down.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests