Home | Forums | Mark forums read | Search | FAQ | Login

Advanced search
Hot Topics
Buraku hot topic Massive earthquake hits Indonesia, Tsunami kills thousands.
Buraku hot topic Japanese jazz pianist beaten up on NYC subway
Buraku hot topic Japan finally heading back to 3rd World Status? LOL
Buraku hot topic Fleeing from the dungeon
Buraku hot topic Why Has This File Been Locked for 92 Years?
Buraku hot topic 'Paris Syndrome' strikes Japanese
Buraku hot topic There'll be fewer cows getting off that Qantas flight
Buraku hot topic Japan will fingerprint and photograph all foreigners!
Buraku hot topic This is the bomb!
Buraku hot topic Debito reinvents himself as a Uyoku movie star!
Change font size
  • fuckedgaijin ‹ General ‹ F*cked News

Court Denies Link Between Chanel And Hostess Bar

Odd news from Japan and all things Japanese around the world.
Post a reply
3 posts • Page 1 of 1

Court Denies Link Between Chanel And Hostess Bar

Postby Mulboyne » Fri Mar 14, 2008 3:10 pm

[floatr]Image[/floatr]Yomiuri: Bar told to stop using Chanel name
The Tokyo District Court on Wednesday ordered a bar in Yokosuka, Kanagawa Prefecture, to stop calling itself Snack Chanel and pay 2.5 million yen in compensation to the Swiss corporation that administers use of the brand name. The Swiss corporation filed the suit, demanding the bar not use the designer brand's name and pay 13 million yen in compensation. Presiding Judge Masami Ichikawa said, "[The bar] has damaged the high-class image of Chanel and harmed the company's profitability." According to the ruling, the manager began operating the bar in September 2005. The ruling said that using the name Chanel for the nightspot violates the Unfair Competition Prevention Law, which prohibits activities violating business ethics. The court estimated the amount of damage at 2.5 million yen based on the length of time the bar used the Chanel name and including the plaintiff's legal fees. The manager of the bar failed to appear at the oral proceedings, and did not submit a written refutation to the court.

Chanel brought an almost identical case against a [I]snakku over 10 years ago and won in the Supreme Court so these guys didn't really stand a chance.[/I]
User avatar
Mulboyne
 
Posts: 18608
Joined: Thu May 06, 2004 1:39 pm
Location: London
Top

Postby Gilligan » Fri Mar 14, 2008 9:17 pm

I understand why Chanel brought the suit, and I understand why the judge ruled the way he did. But I think this comment is a little gratuitous:

Mulboyne wrote:Presiding Judge Masami Ichikawa said, "[The bar] has damaged the high-class image of Chanel and harmed the company's profitability."
User avatar
Gilligan
Maezumo
 
Posts: 1029
Joined: Fri May 19, 2006 10:09 pm
Location: The Big Nag
Top

Postby kamome » Sat Mar 15, 2008 5:09 am

Maybe they should just add an "n" and call themselves "Snack Channel". That would be kind of a cool name.
YBF is as ageless as time itself.--Cranky Bastard, 7/23/08

FG is my WaiWai--baka tono 6/26/08

There is no such category as "low" when classifying your basic Asian Beaver. There is only excellent and magnifico!--Greji, 1/7/06
User avatar
kamome
 
Posts: 5558
Joined: Tue Apr 02, 2002 11:50 am
Location: "Riding the hardhat into tuna town"
Top


Post a reply
3 posts • Page 1 of 1

Return to F*cked News

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests

  • Board index
  • The team • Delete all board cookies • All times are UTC + 9 hours
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group