Home | Forums | Mark forums read | Search | FAQ | Login

Advanced search
Hot Topics
Buraku hot topic Iran, DPRK, Nuke em, Like Japan
Buraku hot topic Stupid Youtube cunts cashing in on Logan Paul fiasco
Buraku hot topic Japanese Can't Handle Being Fucked In Paris
Buraku hot topic Multiculturalism on the rise?
Buraku hot topic Whats with all the Iranians?
Buraku hot topic MARS...Let's Go!
Buraku hot topic Japan Not Included in Analyst's List Of Top US Allies
Buraku hot topic 'Oh my gods! They killed ASIMO!'
Buraku hot topic Tokyo cab reaches NY from Argentina, meter running
Buraku hot topic Re: Adam and Joe
Change font size
  • fuckedgaijin ‹ General ‹ F*cked News

Online Registration Required for U.S. from 2009

Odd news from Japan and all things Japanese around the world.
Post a reply
17 posts • Page 1 of 1

Online Registration Required for U.S. from 2009

Postby kurohinge1 » Tue Jun 03, 2008 12:28 pm

[SIZE="4"]Now online visa registration required for US[/SIZE]


SMH wrote:
. . . travellers who do not need visas to enter the United States will be required to register online with the US government at least three days before they visit, a security regulation set to begin next year.

Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff will announce the rule tomorrow, according to a government official who asked not to be identified because the announcement had not yet been made.

The rule was first reported by the Financial Times today.

Required online registration will begin in January and will be valid for a two-year period.

Those needing to register will be travellers from the 27 countries whose citizens are not required to obtain visas for US entry. The counties include those in most of western Europe as well as Andorra, Australia, Brunei, Japan, New Zealand and Singapore. Eight other countries - the Czech Republic, Hungary and South Korea among them - are expected to be admitted to the visa waiver program . . . more


:smashpc:
  • "This is the verdict: . . . " (John 3:19-21)
  • "It could be that the purpose of your life is only to serve as a warning to others" (Anon)
User avatar
kurohinge1
Maezumo
 
Posts: 2745
Joined: Fri Apr 11, 2003 12:52 pm
Location: Sydney, Australia
Top

Postby SgtBeavis » Tue Jun 03, 2008 10:24 pm

I've been wondering exactly how many "terrorist" the US has captured with the current fingerprinting and alien registration program. I haven't really heard anything in the news about it.

It should be noted that several of the 9/11 hijackers entered the US legally. Only 7 of the 19 hijackers had fraudulent passports. The 9/11 commission's report showed that many of the hijackers would have never gotten into the US if immigration had simply followed the laws and regulations that were already on the books BEFORE 9/11. Mohamed Atta should have never been let into the US to begin with because he had already violated his visa in the past. The 9/11 report pretty much stated that if EXISTING immigration laws and regulations had been followed, the 9/11 attacks would most likely have never occurred.

I'm not a fan of US or Japanese immigration policies. Both border on the stupid.
SgtBeavis
Maezumo
 
Posts: 20
Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2007 12:06 pm
Top

Postby Visitor K » Tue Jun 03, 2008 10:37 pm

SgtBeavis wrote:I've been wondering exactly how many "terrorist" the US has captured with the current fingerprinting and alien registration program. I haven't really heard anything in the news about it.


well, there is a simple explanation for that.. if the news reported on it, then it would only serve to embolden the terrorists and would give them inside information on the very intricate workings of the war on terror.
"When robbery is done in open daylight by sanction of the law, as it is done today, then any act of honor or restitution has to be hidden underground." -Ayn Rand 'Atlas Shrugged'
User avatar
Visitor K
Maezumo
 
Posts: 428
Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2005 10:51 am
Location: bucharest, romania
  • Website
Top

Postby Big Booger » Tue Jun 03, 2008 10:47 pm

Visitor K wrote:well, there is a simple explanation for that.. if the news reported on it, then it would only serve to embolden the terrorists and would give them inside information on the very intricate workings of the war on terror.


How Orwellian....:clap:
My Blog
User avatar
Big Booger
 
Posts: 4150
Joined: Sat Jan 11, 2003 8:56 am
Location: A giant bugger hole
  • Website
Top

Postby Kuang_Grade » Wed Jun 04, 2008 2:55 am

Hmmmm...it only puts off the lazy and identified terrorists who absolutely have to fly into the US....otherwise, they can just fly to mexico and they can line up with all the other illegals at one of the unguarded stretches of the US boarder and just walk in when it gets dark. Actually, if they are not on some watch list already, the US system does not pose any hindrance to a potential terrorist.

And given the high profile nature of this program, they would want to hype it up its successes since serves as a deterrent...This is a program that is used by millions of folks on annual basis not some signal intercept tech that only 15 people at the NSA know about...Saying they would want to keep it quiet on this is like saying the police don't talk about red light cameras...they may not talk up the exact tech specs, but they do talk up what they do and how many people they have busted with them, if only to let everyone know that they are out there and they work and they will bust you if you run a red light.

DHS may want to keep quiet about how somebody ended up on a watch list but they have ZERO reason to keep quiet about those they do catch via a very public and expensive border entry system.
The Enrichment Center reminds you that the weighted companion cube will never threaten to stab you and, in fact, cannot speak.
User avatar
Kuang_Grade
Maezumo
 
Posts: 1364
Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2004 2:19 pm
Location: The United States of Whatever
Top

Postby Charles » Wed Jun 04, 2008 3:00 am

Well this is totally irrational. What do they need, 72 hours to run you through DHS databases? This essentially prohibits anyone from traveling on short notice.

I oppose these visa restrictions, except in the case of Australians.
User avatar
Charles
Maezumo
 
Posts: 4050
Joined: Tue Oct 14, 2003 6:14 am
Top

Mmmm

Postby kurohinge1 » Wed Jun 04, 2008 8:22 am

Charles wrote:
Well this is totally irrational. What do they need, 72 hours to run you through DHS databases? This essentially prohibits anyone from traveling on short notice . . .


. . . Required online registration . . . will be valid for a two-year period . . .


You're lucky there's no comprehension test to leave the U.S.

;)
  • "This is the verdict: . . . " (John 3:19-21)
  • "It could be that the purpose of your life is only to serve as a warning to others" (Anon)
User avatar
kurohinge1
Maezumo
 
Posts: 2745
Joined: Fri Apr 11, 2003 12:52 pm
Location: Sydney, Australia
Top

Postby Greji » Wed Jun 04, 2008 9:08 am

[quote="kurohinge1"]You're lucky there's no comprehension test to leave the U.S.

]

Ahh, what does comprehension mean?
:confused:
"There are those that learn by reading. Then a few who learn by observation. The rest have to piss on an electric fence and find out for themselves!"- Will Rogers
:kanpai:
User avatar
Greji
 
Posts: 14357
Joined: Fri Jun 25, 2004 3:00 pm
Location: Yoshiwara
Top

Postby Charles » Wed Jun 04, 2008 10:49 am

kurohinge1 wrote:You're lucky there's no comprehension test to leave the U.S.

Do you think that everyone's going to register in the database, just in case they have to travel to the US on short notice?
User avatar
Charles
Maezumo
 
Posts: 4050
Joined: Tue Oct 14, 2003 6:14 am
Top

Mmmm

Postby kurohinge1 » Wed Jun 04, 2008 11:37 am

Charles wrote:Do you think that everyone's going to register in the database, just in case they have to travel to the US on short notice?


It's not rocket science, Charles. If someone plans to visit the U.S. (or there's a possibility of needing to go there "on short notice"), they just register. They can then go in and out (on short notice or not) for the next 2 years, after which they just register again.
  • "This is the verdict: . . . " (John 3:19-21)
  • "It could be that the purpose of your life is only to serve as a warning to others" (Anon)
User avatar
kurohinge1
Maezumo
 
Posts: 2745
Joined: Fri Apr 11, 2003 12:52 pm
Location: Sydney, Australia
Top

Postby Iraira » Wed Jun 04, 2008 12:32 pm

Greji wrote:Ahh, what does comprehension mean?
:confused:


I think it has something to do with a person feeling apprehension before using a computer.
Takechanpoo:
"Yeah, I've been always awkward toward women and have spent pathetic life so far but I could graduate from being a cherry boy by using geisha's pussy at last! Yeah!! And off course I have an account in Fuckedgaijin.com. Yeah!!!"
;)
User avatar
Iraira
Maezumo
 
Posts: 3978
Joined: Tue Jun 06, 2006 11:22 am
Location: Sitting across from an obaasan who suffers from gastric reflux.
Top

Postby Charles » Wed Jun 04, 2008 1:15 pm

kurohinge1 wrote:It's not rocket science, Charles. If someone plans to visit the U.S. (or there's a possibility of needing to go there "on short notice"), they just register. They can then go in and out (on short notice or not) for the next 2 years, after which they just register again.

You don't get it. People with no plans to travel may suddenly have to go to the US. People will not sit around wondering if they might have any reason to go to the US within the next 2 years and if they should sign up for a foreign government's antiterrorist database. Frequent travelers may not be affected much, but emergency travelers will be locked out.
User avatar
Charles
Maezumo
 
Posts: 4050
Joined: Tue Oct 14, 2003 6:14 am
Top

Mmmm

Postby kurohinge1 » Wed Jun 04, 2008 1:40 pm

Charles wrote:You don't get it. . .


Au contraire, Charles. You've now changed what you said.

Charles previously wrote: . . . This essentially prohibits anyone from traveling on short notice . . .


Clearly, that's wrong.

The group you're now talking about (in your latest post) would be very small - only those who hadn't already registered AND for whatever reason need to travel to the U.S. with less than 3 days' notice.

:rolleyes:
  • "This is the verdict: . . . " (John 3:19-21)
  • "It could be that the purpose of your life is only to serve as a warning to others" (Anon)
User avatar
kurohinge1
Maezumo
 
Posts: 2745
Joined: Fri Apr 11, 2003 12:52 pm
Location: Sydney, Australia
Top

Postby Charles » Wed Jun 04, 2008 6:14 pm

kurohinge1 wrote:The group you're now talking about (in your latest post) would be very small - only those who hadn't already registered AND for whatever reason need to travel to the U.S. with less than 3 days' notice.

Someone who is already registered has already given advance notice. I said it would prohibit people from traveling on short notice.
User avatar
Charles
Maezumo
 
Posts: 4050
Joined: Tue Oct 14, 2003 6:14 am
Top

Que es ESTA?

Postby omae mona » Fri Aug 29, 2008 8:40 pm

All - quite a bit more information about this new program (ESTA, or "Electronic System for Travel Authorization") has become available. Courtesy of the US Embassy's September newsletter, here is a link to an FAQ with lots of information, and also the online application system:

http://www.cbp.gov/xp/cgov/travel/id_visa/esta/esta_faq.xml

I think there are a few key items to address the questions I saw in this thread:
  • Enforcement goes into effect January 2009
  • Anybody can apply, regardless of whether they actually have travel plans. The registration is valid for two years.
  • They started accepting applications early, on August 1, so you can apply now if you like.
  • As far as emergency travelers who did not forsee the need to apply ahead of time, the site states "ESTA applications may be submitted at any time prior to traveling to the United States under the VWP, and in most cases, ESTA will provide an almost immediate determination of eligibility for travel under the VWP. However, DHS recommends that ESTA applications be submitted no less than 72 hours prior to travel." It appears that you can check your status online. So it's possible that even in emergency circumstances, you may have a shot at getting approved before you need to get on the airplane.
So for those American FGs with non-American family members, it might make sense to sign them up for this program prior to January, in case any sudden travel needs arise.
User avatar
omae mona
 
Posts: 3184
Joined: Mon Aug 18, 2003 12:08 pm
Top

Postby omae mona » Thu Dec 18, 2008 8:44 pm

Friendly reminder for those contemplating travel to the U.S.: The new system is just one month away. The online application is quite easy and will last two years until you have to renew it. You risk being denied boarding to your flight if you haven't registered 72 hours before your travel.

Mrs. Omae Mona has no U.S. travel plans, but I registered her just in case some kind of emergency comes up and we need to travel on short notice.

I know many people have valid privacy concerns, but the mandatory fields on the application only contain information the U.S. government possesses anyway, if you've ever traveled to the U.S. It's basically passport information and questions about prior criminal activity.
User avatar
omae mona
 
Posts: 3184
Joined: Mon Aug 18, 2003 12:08 pm
Top

Postby Samurai_Jerk » Thu Dec 18, 2008 11:23 pm

I'm really starting to hate my country.

Time to rebel!
Image
Faith is believing what you know ain't so. -- Mark Twain
User avatar
Samurai_Jerk
Maezumo
 
Posts: 14387
Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2004 7:11 am
Location: Tokyo
Top


Post a reply
17 posts • Page 1 of 1

Return to F*cked News

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests

  • Board index
  • The team • Delete all board cookies • All times are UTC + 9 hours
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group