bukkake banned

[Taro Toporific]

House passes bill too gross to talk about
The Oregonian - Tuesday April 07, 2009, 12:51 PM
Count it among the shortest "debates" to ever occur in the Oregon House.
"Good bill. I urge your aye vote," Rep. Chris Garrett, D-Lake Oswego, said Tuesday about House Bill 2478.
Any closing remarks?
"No," Garrett said firmly.
The proposed new law nobody wants to talk about would make it a second degree sex abuse crime to propel "a dangerous substance at another person."...more...

[YT]5PHENQiJFzI[/YT]

[Kanchou]

I'm going to assume this doesn't apply to consenting recipients

[Ketou]

Yea, I would think it is to propel a bodily fluid with intent.

[Kanchou]

wtf, double post

[MeinJapanLongTime]

So...I wonder if this would apply to spitting on someone as well...
Dangerous substance...LOL

[Iraira]

I'm going to assume this doesn't apply to consenting recipients

What if the recipient is initially consenting, but due to the Peter North volume discharge being propelled upon her...fuck I'm getting a stiffy....what if she were to become enraged "You got it in my hair, and I have a date tonight with my boyfriend!", could she sue you for illegal shock and awe?
If the stuff hit her in the eye and caused her to ruin a good contact lens, could she sue you for the damages?

DON'T tell me to see a lawyer about this...I need help from those who are not afraid to wear their degeneracy on their sleeves.