Home | Forums | Mark forums read | Search | FAQ | Login

Advanced search
Hot Topics
Buraku hot topic Japanese jazz pianist beaten up on NYC subway
Buraku hot topic Massive earthquake hits Indonesia, Tsunami kills thousands.
Buraku hot topic 'Paris Syndrome' strikes Japanese
Buraku hot topic Japan finally heading back to 3rd World Status? LOL
Buraku hot topic Russian Shenanigans
Buraku hot topic Why Has This File Been Locked for 92 Years?
Buraku hot topic Debito reinvents himself as a Uyoku movie star!
Buraku hot topic There'll be fewer cows getting off that Qantas flight
Buraku hot topic Iran, DPRK, Nuke em, Like Japan
Buraku hot topic This is the bomb!
Change font size
  • fuckedgaijin ‹ General ‹ F*cked News

Labour Ministry Tries To Get Family-Friendly

Odd news from Japan and all things Japanese around the world.
Post a reply
4 posts • Page 1 of 1

Labour Ministry Tries To Get Family-Friendly

Postby Mulboyne » Thu Apr 16, 2009 9:03 am

User avatar
Mulboyne
 
Posts: 18608
Joined: Thu May 06, 2004 1:39 pm
Location: London
Top

Postby Doctor Stop » Thu Apr 16, 2009 9:57 am

User avatar
Doctor Stop
Maezumo
 
Posts: 1837
Joined: Tue Jan 16, 2007 10:12 pm
Location: Up Shit Creek Somewhere
Top

Postby Greji » Thu Apr 16, 2009 10:51 am

Doctor Stop wrote:That's been going on for years, even before the "economic downturn". Pregnant women have always been expected to quit even though there are laws for maternity leave. Even women who marry someone the the same company are expected to quit because they might get pregnant. The changes won't change anything and may just force husband and wife to quit, upon marriage.


I don't know Doc, when I began working for the J-government, that was standard. A woman got married she was expected to quit and I heard ones who stayed on for a while after marriage, be told that this was not acceptable attitude for a proper Japanese woman. The very few who braved the harassment and stayed aboard were basically shunned. But at that time, if they got pregnant, they were done. There was no policy, or exception for maternity leave.

However, this has all changed. Few to any of the women quit on marriage and they now have up to one year authorized abscence, or a straight two month maternity leave.

I think you are only going to find the old thinking in play at small companies. However, having said that, I just heard that the government is looking at increasing complaints at labor offices around the nation about women not be supported for maternity related office problems.

The slant is that these are supposedly small companies, who claim that they cannot afford to pay an employee that isn't there.
:cool:
"There are those that learn by reading. Then a few who learn by observation. The rest have to piss on an electric fence and find out for themselves!"- Will Rogers
:kanpai:
User avatar
Greji
 
Posts: 14357
Joined: Fri Jun 25, 2004 3:00 pm
Location: Yoshiwara
Top

Postby Doctor Stop » Thu Apr 16, 2009 11:04 am

There may be less of it now, but it's still going on in local government and big, internationally known companies. If Japan was more litigation-friendly, you'd see companies comply because the costs of maternity leave are far lower than losing a multi-million dollar lawsuit for each instance. The long term costs to society and the Ponzi scheme, I mean pension system, will be even higher but we all know that.
User avatar
Doctor Stop
Maezumo
 
Posts: 1837
Joined: Tue Jan 16, 2007 10:12 pm
Location: Up Shit Creek Somewhere
Top


Post a reply
4 posts • Page 1 of 1

Return to F*cked News

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests

  • Board index
  • The team • Delete all board cookies • All times are UTC + 9 hours
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group