Japan Asks: They Are?

by **Catoneinutica** » Tue Jun 23, 2009 4:02 pm

"Regimes that repress the civil and human rights of half their population are inherently unstable."

http://www.slate.com/id/2221033/

by **Taro Toporific** » Tue Jun 23, 2009 6:55 pm

Catoneinutica wrote:"Regimes that repress the civil and human rights of half their population are inherently unstable."
http://www.slate.com/id/2221033/

That's why repressing the civil and human rights of the entire population is better.

by **Catoneinutica** » Tue Jun 23, 2009 10:46 pm

Taro Toporific wrote:That's why repressing the civil and human rights of the entire population is better.

Gotta hand it to the J-powers-that-be: they unabashedly repress the civil and human rights of the entire population and still manage to repress women's rights even more.

by **Doctor Stop** » Tue Jun 23, 2009 11:27 pm

Catoneinutica wrote:"Regimes that repress the civil and human rights of half their population are inherently unstable."

What if half their population is already inherently unstable?

by **Catoneinutica** » Tue Jun 23, 2009 11:40 pm

Doctor Stop wrote:What if half their population is already inherently unstable?

You mean like, on a monthly basis?

Hot Topics
Buraku Dead Gaijins	Buraku Confronting the Japanese
Buraku Gas prices	Buraku 1000s in Tokyo rally to CELEBRATE 9.11 terror attacks
Buraku Those Koreans got a lot of nerve	Buraku Japan's Negative Attitude Towards Islam & Muslims
Buraku 'Paris Syndrome' strikes Japanese	Buraku Japan 'very concerned' over Iran tension
Buraku beware of propaganda	Buraku Iran, DPRK, Nuke em, Like Japan

Japan Asks: They Are?

Japan Asks: They Are?

Who is online