
Hot Topics | |
---|---|
Yokohammer wrote:Jobs is only just finding out that "think different" isn't an option here?
Not even "think slightly outside the box," or "adapt to the situation," (or even "think") I'm afraid.
It probably says "no bladed weapons allowed" in the manual. The average Japanese employee simply doesn't have the authority (or imagination) to make exceptions that aren't specifically noted in the manual.
On the other hand, the guys at immigration somehow manage to be imaginative as hell.
IparryU wrote:just a while ago the Jpolice arrested a President of a machinery company (citation) who made some kunai throwing knifes and sold them to ninja fanatics (legally). when the new weapons law came out after the akiba rampage, he still held on to a number of them.
complete BS, i hope jobs voice gets out to more than just a tabloid.
Coligny wrote:SIDE NOTE threadjack...
Japan the land of the unworkable laws...
Since the modification of the road and traffic laws putting bicycle in the category of vehicule that HAVE to travel on the road and are not allowed on the sidewalk, absolutely nobody knows where to sleep... and here they had to paint EVERYWHERE special bicycle reservation lanes on the sidewalks to bypass the law...
Time for a good book burning session... maybe...
This time we can hang the last banker with the guts of the last priest while drowning the last lawmaker in their blood...
YEAAAA.... ANARCHY!!!!!.....
wuchan wrote:kinda funny you brought this up. I got gaijin carded a few months ago by a cop on a bike.
cop: can please see your ID card?
me: why?
cop: there was a crime committed in this area
me: ya, you're riding a bike on the sidewalk
cop: ...
I wandered off while the cop was trying to figure out what just happened.
BigInJapan wrote:I don't know if Steve-o is up on the California penal code, but he can't own shuriken in California anyway.
Probably better he had them taken away here, he could have ended up sharing a cell with a guy named Bubba stateside.
eddie wrote:the rich can't carry weapons on their private jets!? AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAH
eddie wrote:the rich can't carry weapons on their private jets!? AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAH
As part of a new growth strategy for the national economy to be finalized in June, the government plans to improve Narita Airport's ability to accept business jets, The Yomiuri Shimbun learned Wednesday. The measures will include a relaxation of regulations and an expansion of facilities that accommodate private jets, a government official said. The government hopes this will increase Japan's attractiveness as a destination for executive conferences for large global companies and help them expand their business throughout Asia. The plan also looks to attract wealthy foreigners, who may want to fly their private jets to Japan to receive medical care.
In concrete terms, the plans call for an expansion of immigration facilities for business jet passengers by fiscal 2012 to shorten the time it takes to deplane after landing. Currently, it takes about 20 minutes, compared with only a few minutes at many foreign airports. An extension or abolition of the current business jet parking limit of seven days is also being considered. The number of business jet landings at six New York airports totals 255,000 a year, compared with 2,100 at Narita and 500 at Haneda.
The Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism Ministry estimates the number of business jet flights to Japanese airports has decreased by about 4,000 in recent years. This drop is because large corporations have decided to cancel conferences in Japan to hold them in other countries due to the lack of facilities for private planes. Haneda Airport also accepts business jet flights, but landing permission must be obtained seven days in advance and the parking limit is only five days.
A business jet is a small aircraft with a seating capacity of 10-plus passengers. The number of these jets has been increasing since the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks on the United States so top business leaders can travel safely. The U.S. airline industry anticipates the number of private jets will increase from 12,000 in 2006 to 20,000 in 2016.
Jack wrote:Occasionally I fly on private aircraft in North America and the same rules apply to them as they do to commercial flights.
Jack wrote:Occasionally I fly on private aircraft in North America and the same rules apply to them as they do to commercial flights. Private aircraft FBOs often bend the rules for parties of under 10 persons but in big cities that does not apply. If a knife in banned in your carryon on a commercial flight it is also banned on a private jet. If smoking is banned on a commercial flight it is also banned on a private jet. I guess Steve Jobs ego got shaken as he thought he is above the Law.
Jack wrote:Occasionally I fly on private aircraft in North America and the same rules apply to them as they do to commercial flights. Private aircraft FBOs often bend the rules for parties of under 10 persons but in big cities that does not apply. If a knife in banned in your carryon on a commercial flight it is also banned on a private jet. If smoking is banned on a commercial flight it is also banned on a private jet. I guess Steve Jobs ego got shaken as he thought he is above the Law.
Osakadave wrote:And Apple calls BS on the whole shebang, surprise, surprise...
http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/10/09/14/steve_jobs_prevented_from_bringing_throwing_stars_on_private_jet_report.html
Osakadave wrote:And Apple calls BS on the whole shebang, surprise, surprise...
http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/10/09/14/steve_jobs_prevented_from_bringing_throwing_stars_on_private_jet_report.html
Kagetsu wrote:On a side note, as it was touched on already.
(I say this as a PPL holder), most of the world follows very similar laws when it comes to air safety, particularly when it comes to the carriage of dangerous goods of any description.
I can't say from personal experience on the Japanese laws, but from what I've read from people who've flown there and all over the world, there is very little in the laws that differ from Japan to the US to Australia and so on.
If you're entering a secured air space area, the carriage of ANY weapon, or items that could be used as a weapon, outside of the scope of approved maintenance of an aircraft (ie, if you're not qualified to use that spanner on the plane, you are not qualified to have that spanner in the area).
Guns are not permitted under any circumstance (except for air marshalling service, or military service, or in rural (uncontrolled) regions for purposes of mustering).
In effect, even if the items were packed in their respective containers (bags) even then the bags may ONLY be handled by approved security personel once 'checked'... and private airports as said, and from what I hear, do not have these people on hand, and would require prior arrangement.
Being Japan, arranging something of this sort would be a pain in the butt at last minute, and probably seen as rude if the foreigner demanded it.
In addition to that, Jobs strikes me as the kind of guy who'd be a dick about it all.
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 5 guests