Hot Topics | |
---|---|
AML wrote:Just got a magnitude 6 in shizuoka
AML wrote:Just got a magnitude 6 in shizuoka
;)"Yeah, I've been always awkward toward women and have spent pathetic life so far but I could graduate from being a cherry boy by using geisha's pussy at last! Yeah!! And off course I have an account in Fuckedgaijin.com. Yeah!!!"
Yokohammer wrote:I'm back ... just in time for a 6+ in Shizuoka!
WTF is going on?
;)"Yeah, I've been always awkward toward women and have spent pathetic life so far but I could graduate from being a cherry boy by using geisha's pussy at last! Yeah!! And off course I have an account in Fuckedgaijin.com. Yeah!!!"
Yokohammer wrote:I'm back ... just in time for a 6+ in Shizuoka!
WTF is going on?
bigbambooba wrote:Was the epicenter Fuji-san?
bigbambooba wrote:Was the epicenter Fuji-san?
Coligny wrote:Accident rating upgraded to 6 on INES Scale
vitellus wrote:Encouraging information from experts talk by conference call at British embassy in Tokyo
http://www.facebook.com/notes/paul-atkinson/japan-nuclear-update-british-embassy/10150111611771235
I have just returned from a conference call held at the British Embassy in Tokyo. The call was concerning the nuclear issue in Japan. The chief spokesman was Sir. John Beddington, Chief Scientific Adviser to the UK Government, and he was joined by a number of qualified nuclear experts based in the UK. Their assessment of the current situation in Japan is as follows:
* In case of a 'reasonable worst case scenario' (defined as total meltdown of one reactor with subsequent radioactive explosion) an exclusion zone of 30 miles (50km) would be the maximum required to avoid affecting peoples' health. Even in a worse situation (loss of two or more reactors) it is unlikely that the damage would be significantly more than that caused by the loss of a single reactor.
* The current 20km exclusion zone is appropriate for the levels of radiation/risk currently experienced, and if the pouring of sea water can be maintained to cool the reactors, the likelihood of a major incident should be avoided. A further large quake with tsunami could lead to the suspension of the current cooling operations, leading to the above scenario.
* The bottom line is that these experts do not see there being a possibility of a health problem for residents in Tokyo. The radiation levels would need to be hundreds of times higher than current to cause the possibility for health issues, and that, in their opinion, is not going to happen (they were talking minimum levels affecting pregnant women and children - for normal adults the levels would need to be much higher still).
* The experts do not consider the wind direction to be material. They say Tokyo is too far away to be materially affected.
* If the pouring of water can be maintained the situation should be much improved after ten days, as the reactors' cores cool down.
* Information being provided by Japanese authorities is being independently monitored by a number of organizations and is deemed to be accurate, as far as measures of radioactivity levels are concerned.
* This is a very different situation from Chernobyl, where the reactor went into meltdown and the encasement, which exploded, was left to burn for weeks without any control. Even with Chernobyl, an exclusion zone of 30 miles would have been adequate to protect human health. The problem was that most people became sick from eating contaminated food, crops, milk and water in the region for years afterward, as no attempt was made to measure radioactivity levels in the food supply at that time or warn people of the dangers. The secrecy over the Chernobyl explosion is in contrast to the very public coverage of the Fukushima crisis.
* The Head of the British School asked if the school should remain closed. The answer was there is no need to close the school due to fears of radiation. There may well be other reasons - structural damage or possible new quakes - but the radiation fear is not supported by scientific measures, even for children.
* Regarding Iodine supplementation, the experts said this was only necessary for those who had inhaled quantities of radiation (those in the exclusion zone or workers on the site) or through consumption of contaminated food/water supplies. Long term consumption of iodine is, in any case, not healthy.
The discussion was surprisingly frank and to the point. The conclusion of the experts is that the damage caused by the earthquake and tsunami, as well as the subsequent aftershocks, was much more of an issue than the fear of radiation sickness from the nuclear plants.
Let's hope the experts are right!
Doctor Stop wrote:It's only been rated INES 6 by a French surrender monkey (not you Coligny!) and a bunch of overzealous Wikipedia contributors who keep having their contributions reverted.
Great Thing wrote:Now is a good time to buy a bottle of iodine pills if you can find them?
Samurai_Jerk wrote:Good to hear from you! Let us know WTF has been going on.
Yokohammer wrote:Only a kilometer or two from where I am they're still raking up bodies. Bodies left in cars, hanging in trees, all over the damn place. The waves just swept the coastal area clean. Horrifying.
Samurai_Jerk wrote:Fujinomiya-shi. Let's hope you know what (I don't even want to say it) doesn't happen.
CNN blog wrote:The previous record was an 8.6 magnitude earthquake that struck near the Chubu region near southwestern Honshu on October 28, 1707, that may have killed 5,000 people, said CNN meteorologist Sean Morris.
That quake generated a 33-foot (10-meter) tsunami, and some scientists believe the quake may have triggered the eruption of Mount Fuji 49 days later, Morris said.
Yokohammer wrote:Lots of shaking.
I hope they can get good bagettes in Vichy Minami Azabu or wherever they've retreated to. I wouldn't be surprised if the ambassador is caught collaborating with the partially melted down reactor cores.Coligny wrote:They closed the ambassy at the first turd hitting the fan...
Doctor Stop wrote:I hope they can get good bagettes in Vichy Minami Azabu or wherever they've retreated to. I wouldn't be surprised if the ambassador is caught collaborating with the partially melted down reactor cores.
Samurai_Jerk wrote:You haven't actually seen any of that kind of horror first hand have you? That can't be good for the psyche.
Greji wrote:Glad to see ya back Hammer even if ya have to stay down wind!
Ketou wrote:Glad to hear everything's ok there Hammer...
Time to start a daily Konbu intake...
Return to Earthquakes, Tsunamis, Nukes, and other Catastrophes
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests